Bibliographie sélective OHADA

Although Zimbabwe has established several institutions to combat money laundering and related crimes, there is a perception that inadequate measures are taken to apprehend offenders responsible for financial crimes. Institutions such as the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), the Zimbabwe Anti-Corruption Commission (ZACC), the Zimbabwe Republic Police (ZRP), the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) and the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe (RBZ) have done little to prove that the government of Zimbabwe is resolute in combatting money laundering. On the contrary, it increasingly appears that these institutions are poorly equipped and lack the necessary capacity to enforce and uphold anti-money laundering (AML) measures in Zimbabwe. Further, there appears to be a selective application of the law, with one set of rules for individuals or institutions that are perceived as political adversaries of the incumbent establishment and a different set of rules for the political elite. Consequently, the selective application of the law projects Zimbabwe as a jurisdiction that is somehow tolerant to money laundering, corruption and related financial crimes, thereby lowering and tarnishing the standing of the country in the global economic community of nations. This paper provides a regulatory analysis of the AML role-players in Zimbabwe in order to assess their functions in combatting financial crimes. It also analyses whether these role-players are effective and substantively executing their responsibilities therein. The authors argue that while Zimbabwe is well able to effectively combat money laundering through the even application of the law to all persons regardless of their political or economic standing, it is imperative that its AML institutions operate without fear, favour or prejudice. This is crucial in combatting money laundering and instilling confidence in the general public's perception of AML institutions in Zimbabwe.

Zimbabwean financial sector has experienced significant periods of financial distress as depicted by numerous bank failures since 1980. Bank failure occurs when a financial institution experiences significant financial distress, rendering it incapable of fulfilling its obligations to depositors, shareholders and other stakeholders. In other words, bank failure is when a financial institution undergoes substantial financial distress rendering it unable to meet its obligations as they become due. In this thesis, the researcher adopted the definition of bank failure which refers to a situation where a bank is in financial distress and is recapitalised either by the central bank or a strategic investor, acquired by another institution, surrenders its license or the license is suspended, or it closes its operations altogether. This thesis reveals that in Zimbabwe bank failures can be attributed to various factors including the failure of regulatory and supervisory systems to detect irregularities in the operations of banking institutions. In addition, poor corporate governance practices such as inadequate oversight, inexperienced management, undue influence by dominant shareholders, nonperforming loans, excessive risk-taking, abusive related party transactions and noncompliance with laws are commonly cited as causes of bank failures in Zimbabwe. Bank failures often pose negative implications to the banking sector and banking stakeholders such as depositors and investors. This owes to the fact that banks serve as intermediaries that facilitate the avenues for deposits and extend credit services to individuals and the production sector of the economy. It is submitted that the proper functioning of banks requires effective and adequate regulatory supervision. Failure to provide robust and effective regulation of banks could lead to bank failures. This thesis presents a comparative analysis of the banking statutory framework of Zimbabwe and those of the UK and South Africa to determine if the banking laws in Zimbabwe are robust enough to prevent bank failures. The thesis reveals that the banking statutory framework in Zimbabwe is not robust enough to curb bank failures in times of stress because it lacks effective regulatory oversight. This thesis further reveals that poor banking regulation, inconsistent enforcement, weak regulatory insolvency procedures, and inadequate supervision framework are some of the weaknesses in the current banking statutory framework which needs to be rectified in order to combat bank failures effectively in Zimbabwe. The Banking Act does not fully incorporate the international best standards on bank supervision to prevent bank failures. Consequently, the banking statutory framework in Zimbabwe does not comprehensively and effectively provide for the prevention of bank failures like those of the UK and South Africa. The robustness of the banking statutory framework is in providing adequate and effective regulatory provisions and enforcement mechanisms that curb bank failures in Zimbabwe. The researcher proposes the adoption of a new model, the Zimbabwean twin peaks model, comprising the Zimbabwean Prudential Regulatory Authority and the Zimbabwean Financial Sector Conduct Authority. It is argued that if the adoption of the twin peaks model is considered and robustly implemented, it can prevent the causes of bank failures in Zimbabwe.

Although Zimbabwe has established several institutions to combat money laundering and related crimes, there is a perception that inadequate measures are taken to apprehend offenders responsible for financial crimes. Institutions such as the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), the Zimbabwe Anti-Corruption Commission (ZACC), the Zimbabwe Republic Police (ZRP), the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) and the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe (RBZ) have done little to prove that the government of Zimbabwe is resolute in combatting money laundering. On the contrary, it increasingly appears that these institutions are poorly equipped and lack the necessary capacity to enforce and uphold anti-money laundering (AML) measures in Zimbabwe. Further, there appears to be a selective application of the law, with one set of rules for individuals or institutions that are perceived as political adversaries of the incumbent establishment and a different set of rules for the political elite. Consequently, the selective application of the law projects Zimbabwe as a jurisdiction that is somehow tolerant to money laundering, corruption and related financial crimes, thereby lowering and tarnishing the standing of the country in the global economic community of nations. This paper provides a regulatory analysis of the AML role-players in Zimbabwe in order to assess their functions in combatting financial crimes. It also analyses whether these role-players are effective and substantively executing their responsibilities therein. The authors argue that while Zimbabwe is well able to effectively combat money laundering through the even application of the law to all persons regardless of their political or economic standing, it is imperative that its AML institutions operate without fear, favour or prejudice. This is crucial in combatting money laundering and instilling confidence in the general public's perception of AML institutions in Zimbabwe.