Bibliographie sélective OHADA

Le consentement étatique à la compétence des juridictions internationales est un élément incontournable du droit international public. Il régit le le fonctionnement de la justice internationale. Cependant, malgré son ubiquité, la notion est mal comprise. Ce travail, à travers la jurisprudence de la CIJ, d'ITLOS, de l'OMC et du CIRDI, redéfinit ce consentement, à la lumière de son histoire, son rôle et ses enjeux. Cette re-contextualisation est accompagnée d'une présentation et d'une analyse des enjeux contemporains entourant la notion.

This chapter identifies major categories of situations, events and institutions in which or through which questions of international investment law have been dealt with before African courts. The chapter is selective in nature and aims at showing tendencies instead of exhaustivity. A noteworthy tendency that becomes apparent through the chapter’s analysis is that the prevailing narrative of bypassing African courts and tribunals seems declining in importance as an increasing number of national investment law instruments foresee African judicial and arbitral institutions for the settlement of investment disputes.