Bibliographie sélective OHADA

在当前司法实践中，重新仲裁制度可以有效减轻当事人的诉讼负担，缓解司法压力，但是我国的重新仲裁制度还有很大不足，重新仲裁制度主要适用于实体问题，对于程序性问题关注较少，并且重新仲裁与仲裁裁决的终局性和既判力相矛盾，重新仲裁的启动主体与审理主体过于单一。重新仲裁制度应当适用于程序瑕疵，而非实体争议，要发挥撤销仲裁的积极作用，化解重新仲裁与仲裁裁决的终局性和既判力的矛盾，通过规范重新仲裁的启动主体和审理主体，明确重新仲裁的主体，来完善重新仲裁程序，为法院提供合理、具体、可操作的适用思路。 In the current judicial practice, the re-arbitration system can effectively reduce the litigation burden of the parties and alleviate the judicial pressure, but there are still great deficiencies in China’s re-arbitration system, which is mainly applicable to substantive issues, and pays less attention to procedural issues, and the re-arbitration contradicts the finality and res judicata of the arbitral award, and the initiation of re-arbitration and the subject of the trial are too single. The re-arbitration system should be applied to procedural defects rather than substantive disputes, and should play a positive role in revoking arbitration, resolve the contradiction between the finality and res judicata between re-arbitration and arbitral awards, and improve the re-arbitration procedure by standardizing the initiation and hearing subjects of re-arbitration, and clarifying the subject of re-arbitration, so as to provide the courts with reasonable, specific and actionable application ideas.