Bibliographie sélective OHADA

A dissenting opinion with reference to International Commercial Arbitrations elementarily denotes the expression of disagreement by an Arbitrator in relation to both the reasoning and the result of the award granted by the majority of the Tribunal. Though still at a nascent stage, the practice of delivering dissenting opinions is one which needs to be duly noted and taken into due consideration because of the incidental and collateral questions that it nurtures. Fundamentally, a dissenting opinion raises concerns related to the effect, the nature and the rectitude of such opinions. One such collateral question is the enforceability of such dissenting opinions and the repercussions that follow in the context of an arbitral award delivered by the majority. In addition to the above raised question, through this thesis the author will also address other questions such as whether the act of delivering a dissenting opinion is an indicator of the increased sense of maturity of arbitrators in international commercial arbitration? Whether the dissenting opinion possesses any precedential value to the arbitration cases arriving prospectively? and How do such opinions contribute to the development of arbitration jurisprudence. Moreover, through this thesis the author will also attempt from a comparative perspective to examine and make an incisive analysis of the governing rules of arbitration across various arbitration regimes such as ICSID, LCIA which already have a wellestablished arbitration jurisprudence.