Bibliographie sélective OHADA

This thesis intends to justify the necessity to propose an alternative remedy mechanism to current air carriers' obligations in offering complimentary services to passengers in force majeure delays. This mechanism mitigates disputes arising from passengers' dissatisfaction with air carriers' services. The proposal is the result of extensive research arising from a fundamental question: Who should be responsible for damages and/or inconvenience resulting from flight delays caused by force majeure? The source of information for this thesis stems from a combination of the analysis of case law and statutes on one hand, and experience drawn from professional practice and cultural context on the other. This thesis discusses the intersection of international conventions, national legislation, and the practice and expectations of air carriers and their passengers. The thesis specifically examines and highlights the inadequacies of relying on existing international conventions to provide a harmonized solution for flight delay claims. In terms of national remedy mechanisms, research and analysis have been focused on the advanced aviation markets in the West, such as the US and the EU, and on the emerging markets in the East, such as Mainland China and Taiwan. The research and analyses reveal how national laws, which are deeply influenced by socio-economic, political and cultural factors, trigger distinct conflicts of interest between air carriers and passengers. During the course of reviewing the legal jigsaw and uncertainties in current legal practice, the findings revealed more issues. In brief, making more laws cannot guarantee an effective solution for flight delay claims, especially in different jurisdictions. Accordingly, the findings support that a novel solution, free from the uncertainties and complexities in the current legal framework, is needed to resolve passengers' claims or expectations resulting from force majeure delays. Essentially, this novel solution is to form an alternative remedy mechanism that includes a fund and codes of conduct. The fund will implement a risk-sharing function among stakeholders that will include passengers, air carriers and airport managing entities. To mitigate disputes, the proposed codes of conduct will include guidelines to operate the fund with the aim of mutual respect between passengers and air carriers. In so doing, the remedy mechanism will provide equitable answers to the question: "Who should be responsible for damages and/or inconvenience resulting from flight delays caused by force majeure?"