Bibliographie sélective OHADA

仲裁协议是仲裁的起点与基石，但在我国的仲裁实践中仲裁协议内容不规范，出现各类瑕疵的情况比比皆是。我国的仲裁法对于瑕疵仲裁协议并没有规定针对性的解释原则或系统性的方法，只规定了当事人可以就纠纷达成补充协议，若无法达成补充协议，则该瑕疵仲裁协议无效。因此相较于国际上诸多尽可能将仲裁协议效力尽可能作有效认定的国家与国际组织而言，我国法院在裁定瑕疵仲裁协议的效力时往往会过于严苛，将协议效力裁定无效。本文目的在于借鉴外国法对于瑕疵仲裁协议效力的认定标准以及解释原则，为我国法院实践中针对瑕疵仲裁协议效力的处理提出行之有效的认定与解释原则。 The arbitration agreement is the starting point and cornerstone of arbitra-tion, but in China's arbitration practice, the content of the arbitration agreement is not standard-ized, and various defects are common. China’s arbitration law does not stipulate the principle of targeted interpretation or systematic method for defective arbitration agreements, but only stipu-lates that the parties may reach a supplementary agreement on the dispute, and if a supplementary agreement cannot be reached, the defective arbitration agreement is invalid. Therefore, compared with many international countries and international organizations that try to make as effective a determination as possible about the validity of an arbitration agreement, Chinese courts tend to be too strict in ruling on the validity of a defective arbitration agreement and rule that the validity of the agreement is invalid. The purpose of this paper is to refer to the determination standards and interpretation principles of foreign laws on the validity of defective arbitration agreements, and to propose effective principles for the determination and interpretation of the validity of defective ar-bitration agreements in the practice of Chinese courts.