Bibliographie sélective OHADA

The main rationale of prudential bank regulation and supervision of banks has traditionally been to ensure the safety and soundness of banks and protection of depositors. However, best practice standards in bank supervision acknowledge that it is impossible to completely prevent bank failures. Therefore, it is crucial to have regulatory measures in place to deal with banks that fail. Banks are core players in the financial system as the intermediaries between savers and users of capital. In addition, banks provide critical services to consumers, small and medium-sized businesses, large corporate entities and governments who rely on them to conduct their daily business, both at domestic and international level. Banks also fulfil a sui generis role that sets them apart from other financial institutions that are role players in the financial system because, inter alia, they hold “highly” liquid liabilities in the form of deposits that are repayable on demand; they extend long-term loans that may be difficult to sell or borrow against on short notice; they are the back-up source of liquidity to all other institutions (financial and non-financial); and, are also the transmission belt for monetary policy. Unlike other players in the financial system, banks are vulnerable to loss of public confidence and to liquidity risk. Liquidity risk being the risk that a bank will not have sufficient cash to meet short term obligations and the fact that a "run on the bank" by depositors can result in devastating liquidity drainage. Because banks play a special role in the economy and their failure may have a significant impact on financial stability, they need a special approach when they become insolvent or are likely to become insolvent. The 2008 Global Financial Crisis (“GFC”) demonstrated the importance of special resolution regimes for banks; and the need to balance the interests of shareholders, creditors and depositors, while promoting financial stability objectives. Given the critical role of banks in the economy the need is clear for a special resolution regime for banks that provides a legal framework for regulators that avails to them a suite of resolution tools which they can apply to resolve the bank in an orderly manner; to rescue those parts of the bank that may still be viable and to liquidate those parts that are not whilst avoiding a drain on public funds. In order to deal with bank failures in Zimbabwe, the Banking Act [Chapter 24:20] has provided for the mechanism of curatorship since 2000, as a rescue measure aimed at restoring failing banks to economic viability. Curatorship has over the years been applied with mixed success; consequently, Zimbabwe has undertaken a number of reforms which include the enactment of the Troubled Financial Institutions (Resolution) Act in 2005; and the introduction of the problem bank regime via the Banking Amendment Act of 2015. Throughout these reforms, Zimbabwe has elected to retain curatorship, which was once a standalone process in banking legislation to enable bank rescue; and assimilated it into a broader bank resolution framework. This study seeks to determine whether Zimbabwe’s resolution regime requires to be strengthened and if so, to recommend reforms that will align the resolution regime in Zimbabwe with international best practice. For such purpose it will draw upon the Financial Stability Board’s Key Attributes of Effective Resolution Regime as international best practice benchmark. It will further also consider guidance yielded by a comparative study of the resolution regimes in the United Kingdom and South Africa.

Money laundering, the financing of terrorism and proliferation financing continue to be serious threats to the stability of the international financial system. The international community therefore has prioritised the fight against these activities. For example, international bodies such as the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and others have developed standards and recommendations against which countries and organisations are measured in this regard. Against this background, this thesis investigates to what extent Botswana’s legislative framework regarding money laundering, terrorism financing and other illicit financial flows complies with international standards, especially the FATF Recommendations. The study sets the scene by defining and describing money laundering, financing of terrorism and proliferation financing, after which the current statutory framework in Botswana is discussed in detail. After subsequently setting out the various global and regional (specifically African) initiatives in the fight against money laundering and other financial crimes, the current state of affairs in Botswana is benchmarked against both the South African framework as well as the FATF Recommendations. The investigation is limited to a technical assessment (doctrinal analysis) of Botswana law to determine the current compliance (or lack thereof) of the country’s statutory provisions and to make recommendations regarding how the framework can be improved. It is difficult for some countries, especially African countries like Botswana, to comply fully with the FATF Recommendations, since compliance can be expensive and dependent on high levels of expertise on the part of the relevant authorities. Therefore, such more vulnerable countries tend to face a higher risk of being used as conduits for money laundering and related activities. Despite these and other challenges, Botswana has gone to great lengths to re-assess and improve its anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) legislation with a view to move towards full compliance with the FATF Recommendations. Nevertheless, the evaluation indicates that there are some remaining shortcomings in Botswana’s legislation. Consequently, the thesis concludes by proffering certain recommendations towards ensuring that Botswana’s AML/CFT legislation is rendered fully compliant with the FATF Recommendations.