Bibliographie sélective OHADA

This study primarily aims to identify the social responsibility of Libyan and Palestinian telecommunications companies and their contributions to addressing the negative effects resulting from COVID-19. The study focuses on the companies’ efforts to alleviate the burden on the state and citizens, exploring the most significant social contributions made by these companies in response to the pandemic. To answer the research questions and test the hypotheses, the researchers employed a descriptive and analytical approach. After obtaining the necessary data, a validated and evaluated questionnaire was distributed to a sample of 53 individuals, including financial managers, internal auditors, financial analysts, and accountants working in Libyan and Palestinian telecommunications companies. The results of the study indicated that Libyan telecom companies did not contribute significantly to mitigating the negative effects of COVID-19 by activating their social responsibility roles. This conclusion is supported by the respondents' answers, which reflected a moderate degree of contribution, with a mean value of 3.08 and a relative weight of 61.69%, along with a standard deviation of 0.85 and a significance level (Sig) of 0.686. Similarly, Palestinian telecom companies also did not significantly contribute to mitigating the negative effects of the COVID-19 pandemic through their social responsibility roles. Respondents’ answers indicated a moderate level of contribution, with a mean value of 3.24, a relative weight of 64.85%, a standard deviation of 0.849, and a significance level (Sig) of 0.256. The study recommends that Libyan and Palestinian telecommunications companies should enhance their social roles in mitigating the negative effects of the COVID-19 pandemic by actively implementing social responsibility initiatives.

The interpretation of treaties is particularly important in the field of treaty law, as in most cases it is not possible to apply treaties without their interpretation. In addition to the text and context of the treaty, the relevant rules of international law, including the general principles of law, can play an important role in the interpretation of treaties. A treaty is a creation of the international legal system, and its interpretation and implementation should be carried out within the context of the legal system that governs it. The main question to which this research intends to answer is: What is the position of general principles of law in the interpretation of treaties? It seems that the use of general principles of law in the interpretation of treaties can reduce the potential fragmentation of international law and promote its coherence. In this research, by using library sources, international documents and international judicial decisions and arbitration awards and using a descriptive-analytical method, the position of general principles of law in the interpretation of treaties will be examined.

The Court of Appeals was presented with a dispute concerning the recovery of shares sold. The shareholder of a simplified joint-stock company had invoked the right of preemption, which is established by the Civil Code. The Court decided (on 1/10/2017, Appeals Nos. 1704, 1783/2017, Commercial, Civil, Governmental, Unpublished) that the shareholder could return the sold shares in accordance with his right of preemption. It considered that Company Law did not regulate the restitution of shares in the joint-stock company and that it was, therefore, necessary to refer to the provisions of the Civil Code. We think the decision of the Court of Appeals is subject to criticism. Firstly, even though the legislator does not regulate the restitution of the shares of the holding company, he refers to the regime applicable to the company from which the holding company takes its form. In this case, the holding company took the form of a joint-stock company, whose legislator had organized the shareholder's right to recover the shares offered for sale. Secondly, the Court did not follow the order of the official sources of the legal rule governing companies, namely company law, commercial law and commercial customs. Thirdly, the subject matter of the right of preemption is a real and undivided right, which is not the case for the share, since it is a personal right.

The Contractual Obligation is proven to be owed by its owner as soon as the contract is concluded or the deadline for its implementation is due, Following this that the contractual violation should be before it not after, and if that kind of violation is the ordinary kind of contractual fault so the happening of contractual violation before the execution is a case been put by rules and Judicial Pronouncements as putting it in certain ordered law firm has its special private rules and obligations that distinguishes it from any similar cases of the expiry of contract. And for that the advanced breaching by any behavior came out of the debtor in a clear or hidden way makes it Impossible or in-vain to execute a future commitment, because of that there will be a serious average on the creditor that that allows him to revoke the contract or ending it or asking for the compensation of any average might be caused by the debtor. The Arabic laws haven’t exclusive a special law for that hidden violation regardless how important it is, and amongst the warnings of going to the ordinary law of handling the wrongs of contractual violations specially with the hidden contractual commitments regarding the typical dissonance with the normal known violation.

control and measure it. By proposing a list of criteria used in assessing their existence, consideration or elimination, and to test the criteria, the researcher applied them to a commercial insurance. In order to achieve the goal of the research; the researcher used the inductive analytical method, by following the rules suggested by the Fuqaha’, which required an analysis of some Fuqaha’ sayings, to build standards. The research concluded that the «Need» that some Fuqaha’ considered in the permissibility of commercial insurance does not meet these criteria in a way that supports their opinion. Accordingly; Commercial insurance in its current form is not permissible, which is the opinion of the majority of contemporary Fuqaha’. The research recommends calibration what accepts calibration from the fundamentalist tools, which enable the mujtahid and the researcher to stand on the Shari’a ruling in a disciplined manner, and reduce the difference between the mujtahidin’s considerations of the tools and methods of ruling making.

There is a growing stream of critics who see investment arbitration in favor of foreign investors and as a negative force as opposed to sustainable development. The phenomenon of third-party funding and its use in investment arbitration has increased such concerns. Third-party funding is basically the payment of all or a part of the arbitration costs of one of the parties of dispute by a third party funder which in return, the funder receives a percentage of the output of the award if successful. The purpose of this article is to explain and analyze the theoretical differences between pros and cons of third-party funding regarding the access to justice, screening mechanism for the claims, and the financial consequences on the host state. In this article, the advocates see third-party funding as a means of access to justice for aggrieved investors in investment claims, while the adversaries refering on the profitability of third-party funding, see this method in arbitration a form of wealth transfer from public sector to private corporations and also refer to the asymmetric structure of the investment arbitration regime as well as the risks arising from the transfer of management and control of arbitration process to the third party funders. یک جریان رو به رشدی از منتقدان وجود دارد که داوری سرمایه‌گذاری را به نفع سرمایه‌گذاران خارجی و بعنوان یک نیروی منفی در تضاد با توسعه پایدار می‌داند. پدیده تأمین مالی ثالث و بکارگیری آن در داوری سرمایه‌گذاری به این نگرانی‌ها افزوده است. تأمین مالی ثالث اساساً پرداخت تمام یا بخشی از هزینه‌های داوری یکی از طرفین دعوی توسط تأمین کننده شخص ثالث است که در ازای آن، تأمین کننده مالی درصدی از رأی صادره را در صورت پیروزی دریافت می‌نماید. هدف مقاله، تشریح و تحلیل اختلافات نظری موافقان و مخالفان تأمین مالی ثالث در خصوص دستیابی به عدالت، غربالگری دعاوی و تبعات مالی آن بر دولت است. در این مقاله موافقان، تأمین مالی ثالث را ابزاری جهت دستیابی به عدالت برای سرمایه‌گذاران زیان‌دیده در دعاوی سرمایه‌گذاری در نظر می‌گیرند در حالی که مخالفان با اتکا به اهداف سودآوری تأمین مالی ثالث، این روش را در داوری نوعی انتقال ثروت از بخش عمومی به بخش خصوصی می‌دانند و به ساختار نامتقارن رژیم داوری سرمایه‌گذاری و خطرات ناشی از انتقال مدیریت و کنترل فرایند داوری به تأمین کنندگان شخص ثالث نیز اشاره می‌نمایند.

Researching the judicial applications of Arab countries to one of the issues that have occupied legal thoughts in the Western world for decades and still in one form or another, the so-called Unilateral Arbitration Clauses, we did not find a discussion of the applicability of this clause within the laws. Even though this condition takes a reasonable space of the legal arguments as previously mentioned, it has even become widely used in contracts, such as tenancy, contracting, and financial investments. The study showed that the above-mentioned clause has recently increased its use in financing contracts, especially with the increasing globalization of banking services and bank transfers. Although banks usually prefer to resort to traditional litigation, lack of similarity in the legal rules and judicial applications related to banking transactions and their difference from one country to another was a reason for the banks preference of resorting to arbitration. There is no examination of the legitimacy of an unequal or optional arbitration clause in Bahrain. Also, the Bahraini and Egyptian courts, to the best of our knowledge, did not decide whether it should be considered null or valid. The same case is applied to the French courts which have no cases that examined this type of clauses except for a case in 2006 and the other is a judgment close to the same issue on October 7, 2015, from the French Court of Cassation. The English and American courts were different; they examined this clause and had several judicial implementations due to the fact that most of the arbitration terms are either related to multinational companies operating within the framework of the Wall Street Stock Exchange in New York or those that stipulate the enforcement of British and Wales law on the provisions of the contract . However, many Arab countries, in general, as well as Bahrain and some Gulf countries, in particular, are seeking in their economic model to attract foreign investments and capital, especially those related to financial and banking industries, to diversify sources of income. The decision of investing or not investing the capital in a country is made by the judicial authority in terms of independence as well as the judicial application of legal texts as these factors are directly reflected in the desire to invest and show the possibility of protecting investors.

The need Settlement of disputes arising from bank credit between national and international rules, protecting the interests of the bank and ensuring its financial rights before the debtor. As the Bank faces different technical and legal difficulties, as well as the multiplicity of legal adaptation, we deal with the rules governing banking accreditation from the point of pleadings law, and the methods of amicable settlement of these disputes and following, and compulsory execution. International efforts are taking the lead in establishing the technical regulation of bank accreditation and setting rules "DOCDEX" in 1997, and the 2015 amendments, which still need more as they do not provide a legal way to implement them. It is necessary to find out legal regulation at the domestic and international levels, which calls for the legislator to intervene to organize its rules and procedures. We have sought in this study to weave the legal entity to seize bank credit within the legally acceptable limits based on a system of seizure of the debtor with third parties against the background of the legal system of documentary credit and the relationships arising from it, and its financial and economic effects that go beyond the parties to the beneficiaries of companies, bodies, and economic institutions, As the matter still requires the existence of special legislation regulating the seizure of bank credit, to ensure the effectiveness of the guarantees surrounding the appropriations by the national legislator and at the international level. This would expand the insurance of bank credit so that the creditors recover their full right directly or by seizing the value of the credit, which calls for organizing this seizure with rules that consider the privacy of this seizure and its rules and are consistent with the required speed in such transactions in a way that protects the creditor from abuse, in a manner that ensures the observance of confidentiality, due process, and the spirit of banking work, anticipate the possible future that will witness the decline of documentary credit and replace it with electronic transactions, the establishment of specialized banking courts that save time and effort.

This research deals with the principle of in kind execution of contractual obligations and the exceptions thereto under the 2016 UNIDROIT Principles and the provisions of the French Civil Code created by decree of 10 February 2016, which amends the Law on Contracts and General Provisions and Proof of Obligations. Both the UNIDROIT Principles and the French civil law establish the principle of in kind execution; it applies to all types of contractual obligations. Nevertheless, the UNIDROIT Principles state five exceptions to this principle, namely: when performance is impossible in law or in fact; when performance is unreasonably burdensome or expensive; when the party entitled to performance may reasonably obtain performance from another source; when performance is of an exclusively personal character; or when the party entitled to performance does not require performance within a reasonable time. Also, the French Civil Code includes similar exceptions to the obligation to perform in kind, namely, if the in kind execution is impossible, and if there is an apparent in proportionality between the cost the good faith debtor would endure and the benefit the creditor would achieve from the in kind execution. This research aims to analyze and compare the provisions on in kind execution under the UNIDROIT Principles and French Civil Law, in order to identify the extent to which they are harmonious or different. Accordingly, the principle of in kind execution of contractual obligations, including the conditions of its application is analyzed in the first chapter. The second chapter tackles the exceptions to this principle, in terms of concept, conditions of application, the judge's authority and the parties’ freedom to exclude them

The right to water in investment arbitration has been one of the most contentious issues before investment arbitration tribunals in recent decades. The privatization of public services, including water and sanitation, and assigning them to foreign investors has caused the right to water as a vital benefit being repeatedly raised in investment arbitrations. However, due to tribunals’ narrow interpretation of jurisdiction and applicable law, this fundamental human right has been considered irrelevant and ignored, and this has fueled the legitimacy crises in investment arbitration. This research seeks to indicate the potentiality of more protection of the right to water through balancing the states international obligations in the two areas of investment law and human rights law. Proposed methods for integrating human rights with investment law include the correct interpretation of jurisdictional clauses and the applicable law based on the treaties interpretation principles, systematic integration and the inclusion of new clauses in investment agreements. طرح حق بر آب در داوری سرمایه‌گذاری یکی از مناقشه‌انگیزترین مباحث پیش روی دیوان‌های داوری در چند دهه اخیر بوده است. خصوصی‌سازی خدمات عمومی از جمله آب و فاضلاب و سپردن آنها به سرمایه‌گذاران خارجی موجب شده تا حق بر آب بعنوان یک منفعت عمومی و حیاتی بارها در داوری‌های سرمایه‌گذاری مطرح شود. با تفسیر مضیق محاکم از شروط صلاحیتی و قانون حاکم، این حق بنیادین بشری در برخی موارد نامربوط و نادیده تلقی شده و این امر به بحران مشروعیت در داوری سرمایه‌گذاری دامن زده است. این جستار می‌کوشد تا امکان حمایت بیشتر از حق بر آب را از طریق برقراری تعادل بین تعهدات بین‌المللی دولت‌ها در دو عرصه حقوق سرمایه‌گذاری و حقوق بشر نشان دهد و در پایان روش‌هایی را برای ادغام این دو از جمله تفسیر درست شروط صلاحیتی و قانون حاکم با تکیه بر اصول تفسیر معاهدات، تلفیق سیستمیک و گنجاندن بندهای جدید در موافقتنامه‌های سرمایه‌گذاری پیشنهاد کند.

إن الإعلام بالأسعار والتعريفات التزام قانوني يقع على عاتق البائع من أجل تبصرة المستهلك حتى يكون على علم بما سيقدم له من تعاملات بشكل علني وواضح بهدف إضفاء الشفافية على الممارسات التجارية ، ويتحقق الإعلام بمجموعة من الوسائل العامة وأخرى خاصة نص عليها المشرع الجزائري في القانون 04/02 الذي يحدّد القواعد المطبقة على الممارسة التجارية،كما أن الإخلال بتنفيذ الالتزام بالإعلام يؤدي إلى ترتيب المسؤولية المدنية تتمثل في إمكانية إبطال عقد البيع الاستهلاكي على أساس نظرية عيوب الإرادة أو على أساس عدم العلم الكافي بالمبيع ، وأيضا إقرار المسؤولية الجزائية على كل مخالفي هذا الالتزام بعد إجراء المعاينة وضبط المخالفات من طرف الأشخاص المختصة بالمراقبة وبالتالي توقيع عقوبات جزائية فضلا عن الجزاء الإداري ، هذا من أجل المحافظة على التوازن في العلاقة التعاقدية بين المستهلك باعتباره الطرف الضعيف في العلاقة وبين المتعاملين الاقتصاديين من أجل إرساء أسس النظام العام الاقتصادي. Informing about prices and tariffs is a legal obligation that the seller has in order to inform the consumer so that he is aware of what will be dealt with in a public and clear manner with the aim of imparting transparency to commercial practices The media is verified by a set of public and private means that the Algerian legislator stipulated in law 04-02 witche spicifies the rules aplicable to commercial practice, also the failure to implement the obligation to the media leads to the arrangement of civil liability represented in the possibility of nullifying the consumy sale contract on the basis of theoty of defects of the will or on of the basis of insufficient knowledge of the sale, and also the recognition of criminal liability for all violators of this obligation after conducting the inspection and controlling the violation by the persons concerned whith control consequenlty, penal sanctions are imposed in addition to the administrative penality, in order to maitain balance in the contratctual relationship and the economic dealers in order to lay the foundations of the general economic order.

يتضمن هذا البحث الحديث عن موضوع مهم جدا في مسألة حوكمة الشركات التجارية وهو إظهار مواطن التأثير من قبل محافظ الحسابات و إبراز مبادئ الحوكمة وتحقيقها في الشركة التجارية وما يتبعها من وعي لدى أصحاب المصالح وما ينتج عنه من زيادة الثقة في تعاملات الشركة وربحيتها ،لذلك تم الاهتمام بفحص النصوص المنظمة لتعيين محافظي الحسابات وبيان مهامهم ومسؤولياتهم وتقدير كفاية الحماية المدنية التي تحتوي عليها هذه النصوص ومدى ملاءمتها وخدمتها لقواعد الحوكمة. ومن ناحية أخرى حوكمة المسؤولية في حد ذاتها من خلال توقيعها على محافظي الحسابات الذين يستحقون حقا المساءلة وإعفاء من قاموا بواجباتهم التي فرضها القانون على أتم وجه من خلال تكريس القواعد التي تعفي من المسؤولية والأخرى التي تأمنهم منها. This research includes talking about a very important topic in the issue of business governance, which is to show the influence of the portfolios of accounts and to highlight the principles of governance and its realization in the commercial company and the subsequent awareness of stakeholders and the resulting increased confidence in the company's dealings and profitability, so attention was paid to examining the texts governing the appointment of account governors and showing their functions and responsibilities and assessing the adequacy of civil protection contained in these texts and their suitability and service to governance rules. On the other hand, governance of responsibility per se by signing it to the auditors who truly deserve accountability and exempting those who have fully carried out their duties imposed by law by enshrining the rules that exempt them from liability and those from which they are safe.

Sometimes foreign investors after the dispute have arisen or when it is predictable and with the intention of bringing the dispute to arbitration, change their nationality or acquire new nationality. The phenomenon called Nationality Planning eases foreign investors’ access to a desirable treaty and increases the chance of bringing disputes against host states.So host states try to avoid these disputes by raising objections to Ratione Temporis or claiming abuse of rights. Arbitration tribunals’ approach towards their Ratione Temporis and abuse of rights is material in host states’ success in limiting Nationality Planning. So the question to be answered is that what requirements are considered by arbitrations in determining Ratione Temporis and abuse of rights and how these two are different. Arbitral precedent shows that these tribunals make distinction between cases of nationality planning contrary to their Ratione Temporis and cases that are considered as abuse of rights. However, in practice their strict approach results in limited acceptation of objections to Ratione Temporis or abuse of rights claims. گاه سرمایه‌گذار خارجی پس از بروز اختلاف یا زمانی که اختلاف قابل پیش‌بینی است و به قصد طرح دعوی در مرجع داوری، اقدام به تغییر تابعیت یا کسب تابعیت جدید می‌نماید. این اقدام که برنامه‌ریزی تابعیت نام دارد، دسترسی سرمایه‌گذار خارجی به یک معاهده سرمایه‌گذاری مطلوب را تسهیل کرده و احتمال طرح دعوی علیه دولت میزبان را افزایش می‌دهد. از این‌رو دولت‌های میزبان تلاش می‌کنند با طرح ایراد به صلاحیت زمانی یا سوء استفاده از حق، مانع پذیرش چنین دعوایی شوند. رویکرد مراجع داوری در احراز صلاحیت زمانی خود و تشخیص موارد سوء استفاده از حق، در موفقیت یا عدم موفقیت دولت میزبان در مقابله با برنامه‌ریزی تابعیت تعیین‌کننده است. بنابراین باید به این پرسش پرداخته شود که مراجع داوری چه شرایطی را برای احراز صلاحیت زمانی و سوء استفاده از حق در نظر می‌گیرند و چگونه میان این دو تمایز قائل می‌شوند. رویه مراجع داوری حاکی از آن است که این مراجع میان مواردی از برنامه‌ریزی تابعیت که مانع صلاحیت زمانی آن‌هاست و مواردی که سوء استفاده از حق تلقی می‌گردد، تمایز قائل می‌شوند. هرچند رویکرد سخت‌گیرانه آنها در عمل موجب می‌شود تنها در موارد محدودی ایراد به صلاحیت زمانی یا ادعای سوء استفاده از حق مورد پذیرش واقع شود.

Measures taken by governments during armed conflict to safeguard their essential interests sometimes cause damages to foreign investors. The investors thus affected seek remedies in the arbitration tribunals invoking breach of host government obligations to protect investments. The host government also usually attempts to assert as defense non-precluded measures to prove its irresponsibility, or if it proves responsible, justify it by resorting to circumstances precluding wrongfulness in the customary international law. But since different courts do not consider the same requirements to invoke these rules, there is no certainty that the parties to the lawsuit will be able to invoke them and, as a result, the scope of government's obligations to protect the foreign investor during the armed conflict is obscure. To clarify the scope of the host government's obligations to protect the foreign investor during armed conflicts and balance the interests of the investor and the host government during the investment disputes arising from the armed conflict, this article explores the possibility and requirements of invoking circumstances precluding wrongfulness and non-precluded measures and the relationship between them. اقداماتی که دولت‌ها در زمان مخاصمات مسلحانه در جهت حفظ منافع اساسی خود انجام می‌دهند گاه موجب ورود خسارت به سرمایه‌گذاران خارجی می‌گردد. سرمایه‌گذاران آسیب‌دیده در محاکم داوری با استناد به نقض تعهدات حمایتی توسط دولت میزبان، خسارات وارده به خود را طلب می‌نمایند. دولت میزبان نیز معمولاً برای اثبات عدم مسئولیت خود به شرط اقدامات منع نشده مندرج در معاهده سرمایه‌گذاری استناد می‌کند و یا در صورت اثبات مسئولیت، به منظور توجیه آن به معاذیر رافع وصف متخلفانه در حقوق بین‌الملل عرفی متوسل می‌شود. اما از آنجا که محاکم مختلف، شرایط یکسانی را جهت استناد کشور میزبان به شرط اقدامات منع نشده و معاذیر رافع وصف متخلفانه در نظر نمی‌گیرند، قطعیتی در امکان استناد به آن‌ها وجود ندارد. در نتیجه، قلمرو تعهد دولت به حمایت از سرمایه‌گذار خارجی در زمان مخاصمات مسلحانه در هاله‌ای از ابهام فرو رفته است. این مقاله با هدف روشن ساختن قلمرو تعهد دولت میزبان به حفاظت از سرمایه‌گذار خارجی در هنگام مخاصمات مسلحانه و به منظور توازن منافع سرمایه‌گذار و دولت میزبان در دعاوی سرمایه‌گذاری ناشی از مخاصمات مسلحانه، امکان و الزامات استناد کشور میزبان به معاذیر عرفی رافع وصف متخلفانه و شرط اقدامات منع نشده و ارتباط میان آنها را مشخص می‌نماید

The importance of studying this contract is to establish the legal nature of the bank’s responsibility when it fails to collect the value of the commercial paper, and to know the role and direction of the judiciary in that respect. The study relied on the element of analysis and education in a brief scientific way. The purpose of the study is to examine the legal basis for the Bank’s responsibility in the collection contract and the general provisions for this responsibility resulting for it, and to cover that responsibility in all its aspects. The study relies on the analytical method in order to achieve the purpose and objectives of the research, where the legal texts will be analyzed and practical results will be reached. In this research legal texts will be analyzed to reach scientific results, the study also reached results, including that there was no regulation from the Jordanian legislator for the collection, in addition to the overlapping of the agency and deposit contracts in the collection contract and that the bank’s responsibility towards its client is a contractual responsibility due to the nature of the relationship between them. The research recommends that the Jordanian Trade law should include special texts dealing with the collection contract, and that the judiciary be more present while evaluating the nature of the relationship and the basis of responsibility between the bank and its client, and it should be clearly stated that the bank may require the disqualification of itself from the liability resulting from collection contract.

International commercial arbitration imposes heavy costs to the parties involved. In this regard, one of the new phenomena in international commercial arbitration is "financing of court costs by a third party investor. There are several reasons for the emergence of a third party investor: 1- involved parties may not have the resources to pay for the costs of arbitration or they may be reluctant to use their funds to finance the litigation: 2. the uncertainty of receiving compensation as a result of paying the arbitration fees might encourage the parties to transfer this risk to a third party; 3. having its own advantages and disadvantages. Since the funder holds the power of the purse, TPF entails the risk of the control of the claim being transferred to the third party funder. We might ask whether international arbitration tribunals should examine the extent of the investor's influence in determining the allocation of costs or not. In addition, is it essential to disclose the third parties contracts confidential? Overall, it is concluded that those mentioned Tribunals should allocate and guarantee the arbitration cost and agree on disclosing of third parties fund contracts under urgent conditions by international arbitration tribunal. مراجعه به داوری تجاری بین­ المللی هزینه­ های کلانی را برای طرفین درگیر در فرآیند داوری به همراه دارد و تأمین این هزینه ­ها در خیلی از موارد به‌صورت مانع در مراجعه به داوری نمود پیدا می‌کند. در همین راستا یکی از پدیده‌های جدید در داوری تجاری بین ­المللی، «تأمین مالی هزینه دادرسی توسط سرمایه ­گذار ثالث» است. ظهور سرمایه­ گذار ثالث دلایل متعددی دارد؛ اولاً طرفین دعوی ممکن است فاقد امکانات مالی کافی برای هزینه ­های داوری باشند، ثانیاً ممکن است طرفین دعوی تمایلی به استفاده از منابع مالی خود برای تأمین مالی دادرسی پرهزینه نداشته باشند، ثالثاً عدم قطعیت ذاتی که در زمینه امکان اخذ خسارت در نتیجه دادرسی وجود دارد می ­تواند باعث تمایل طرف منازعه به انتقال این ریسک به شخص ثالث شود. پرسش این است که آیا محاکم تجاری بین‌المللی تعیین تخصیص هزینه‌ها بپردازد یا خیر؟ و آیا افشاسازی قراردادهای شخص ثالث ضروری می‌باشد؟ در نهایت این نتیجه حاص می‌شود که محاکم مذکور باید به تعیین تخصیص و تضمین هزینه‌های داوری پرداخته و از سویی با افشاسازی قراردادهای تامین مالی شخص ثالث در داوری تجاری بین ­المللی، در شرایط خاص و ضروری موافقت نمایند.

As international trade is expanding, international trade and tax disputes are increasing. Under international tax agreements, there are two mechanisms for the resolution of potential disputes between contracting States. These agreements mostly rely on a form of negotiation known as the “Mutual Agreement Process (MAP)” as the main mechanism for the settlement of disputes. During the last decade, the inclusion of “ad hoc arbitration” as a new dispute resolution mechanism in international tax treaties has become popular to augment the MAP. Iran has long concluded several international tax agreements with several countries for the avoidance of double taxation. Due to Iran’s macroeconomic policy for relying more on tax revenues as an alternative to revenues from the petroleum industry, it is important that the Iranian lawyers seek to focus more on tax law and tax dispute resolution mechanisms. The purpose of this article is to introduce and critically analyse the dispute resolution mechanisms of international tax agreements. In this article, to make some suggestions for the improvement of the dispute resolution system of tax treaties, the strengths and weaknesses of the MAP and ad hoc arbitration, will be scrutinised by adopting a descriptive-analytical approach. همسو با گسترش تجارت فراسرزمینی،‌ میزان دعاوی مرتبط با تجارت و مالیات‌های بین‌المللی نیز افزایش یافته است. در بسیاری از معاهده‌های مالیاتی بین‌المللی برای حل اختلافات، دو ساز و کار با عنوان «فرآیند توافق دوجانبه» و «داوری موردی» وجود دارد. فرآیند توافق دوجانبه که مبتنی بر مذاکره بین طرفین معاهده است بعنوان ساز و کار اصلی و داوری موردی هم که در یک دهه اخیر در این معاهده‌ها رواج یافته، بعنوان ساز و کار مکمل فرآیند توافق دوجانبه برای حل اختلافات استفاده می‌شوند. ایران از دیرباز جهت اجتناب از مالیات مضاعف، معاهده‌های مالیاتی متعددی را با کشورهای مختلف منعقد نموده است. همچنین سیاست کلان اقتصادی کشور در سال‌های اخیر مبتنی بر اتکای بیشتر به درآمدهای مالیاتی بعنوان جایگزینی برای درآمدهای نفتی بوده است. لذا اهمیت شناخت این نوع معاهده‌ها و‌ مکانیسم‌های حل و فصل اختلافات آنها برای حقوقدانان کشور بیش از پیش آشکار می‌شود. هدف این مقاله معرفی،‌ تحلیل و نقد ساز و کارهای موجود در معاهده‌های مالیاتی بین‌المللی برای حل اختلافات می‌باشد. در این مقاله نقاط ضعف و قوت فرآیند توافق دوجانبه و داوری موردی به شیوه توصیفی-تحلیلی بیان و راهکارهایی جهت بهبود این مکانیسم‌ها ارائه می‌شود.

بالإضافة إلى التضامن الخارجي الذي يربط الموقعين على الورقة التجارية بالحامل، أقام المشرع ضربا من التضامن الداخلي بين الموقعين ببعضهم البعض، فأجاز القانون لكل موقع قام بوفاء قيمة هذه الورقة أن يرجع على مختلف الموقعين منفردين أو مجتمعين بكل ماأوفاه دون أن يتحمل نصيبا معينا متمتعا بجميع الحقوق الناشئة عن هاته الورقة التي كان الحامل السابق يتمتع بها، غير أن هذا الرجوع الذي يقوم به الموفي لايكون إلا على الضامنين السابقين عليه في التوقيع دون اللاحقين المضمونين من طرفه In addition to the external solidarity which binds the signatories of the commercial paper with the holder, the legislator has established a form of internal solidarity between the signatories between them, so that the law allows each site having paid the value of this paper to return to the different signatories individually or collectively with all that they have accomplished without incurring a certain share and enjoying all the rights. Coming out of this paper from which the previous holder benefited, however, this return made by the taxpayer only concerns the guarantors who preceded him in the signature without the following guarantees by him.