Bibliographie sélective OHADA

No abstract provided.

Although extreme poverty has decreased in the last decades, we are a long way from eradicating global poverty. Similarly, the world has seen a considerable decrease in global inequality due to recent developments in emerging economies, but overall inequality between nations has risen in the last decades. International tax law may have a relevant role in improving or worsening global inequality. Extensive research has shown that the present international tax system was designed in a way that tends to benefit high-income economies. However, there has been no significant discussion about whether and how international tax law rules should be changed to address global inequality. The main goal of this thesis is to analyze the existing legitimacy and distributive justice issues that limit the ability of lower-income countries to raise tax revenues and consider what can be done to make the current international tax regime more aligned with global justice principles.The thesis builds on the contemporary literature in international political economy and global distributive justice and puts forth a normative framework for allocating the international tax base among states. First, it analyzes some of the legitimacy deficits of the present international tax system. In contrast to prevailing views about improving legitimacy, it demonstrates the shortcomings of focusing solely on making international tax policymaking processes more inclusive and argues for a greater focus on global distributive justice. It then analyzes the main tax theories that have defined international tax relations to date and demonstrates some of their limitations. The final part of the thesis puts forth normative principles that integrate distributive justice and considers the practical implications of the proposed normative framework for some of the most recent issues discussed in international tax policy

The OPA. Notions of takeover bids. Recognising and distinguishing the various forms of control within a company. Type of takeover bid. Subsequent defence techniques. The US control market and details of M&A and tender offers. Bids and acquisitions in China. Comparative European case studies. Shaldeholders' agreements. Regulatory sources and definition of covenants. Concerted action. Takeover obligations arising from concerted action. Cases. The Fondiaria-Sai case. Unipol-BNL. Other case of exemption.

The Uniform Act related cooperative societies (UA-COOP) is the main source of cooperative law in all the seventeen States parties to the OHADA founding Treaty. Ten years after its entry into force (2011-2021), the aim of this study is to assess the level of enforcement of this Act. More concretely, the aim is to compare the state of cooperative law at the time of the entry into force of the UA-COOP (2011) with the current situation (in 2021). Such a comparison should make it possible to assess the contribution of the UA-COOP to the development of cooperative law and strengthening of national cooperative movements in the OHADA zone.

In recent years, investment arbitration tribunals are increasingly confronted with allegations of corruption, mostly invoked by host States as a defense to investors’ claims. After an affirmative finding of an alleged corrupt act between the investor and a public official of the host State in the establishment or conduct of the investment, tribunals have adopted a binary approach to the issue – if they uphold allegations of corruption, they completely dismiss the investor’s submissions. This binary approach has resulted in an asymmetry of liability for the two parties to a corrupt act (i.e., investors and host States/host State officials), failing to take into account the inherent bilateralism of corruption and the fact that domestic laws and international norms have outlawed both the act of offering and of accepting bribes. In particular, public officials’ free participation in a corrupt act to advance investments is attributable to the host State and requires State responsibility under international law. Moreover, the increasingly prevalent practice of inserting anti-corruption provisions in investment treaties has reinforced this lop-sided feature, as well as offering only weak effectiveness in terms of deterring corruption. After a careful examination of the treatment of corruption issues in investment arbitration and investment treaties, this thesis proposes a paradigm shift from the current asymmetric approach to a more balanced approach. It calls on investment tribunals to take a dual-track approach that investigates both corruption and investors’ claims, and ensures that each party assumes responsibility for its own misconduct. It also proposes that treaty drafters include anti-corruption provisions that impose strong obligations of anti-corruption on both sides of corruption (i.e., investors and host States) rather than merely on a single party to it

The reform of the Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) mechanism has provoked much debate among legal scholars and practitioners. The critiques of ISDS mainly arise from concerns regarding the legitimacy of the mechanism such as the perceived tolerance for the lack of impartiality and consistency. To allay these concerns, there have been proposals to reform ISDS by establishing investment courts with tenured judges and appellate tribunals. However, international adjudication systems like ISDS cannot be fully analogized to domestic courts in common law countries: ISDS falls into a broader international regime where there are neither hierarchical/centralized decision-making and enforcement authorities nor a multilateral investment treaty, and the rules and principles on foreign investment protection are fragmented in around three thousand Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs). Against this backdrop, this thesis argues that, although there is a general agreement among the international community to further legalize international investment law, the process of legalization via the specific avenue of reforming the adjudication mechanism (i.e. ISDS) is subject to (1) the institutional constraint of international investment law, especially the lack of shared understanding among the international community regarding the treatment of foreign investments, and (2) the internal constraints of adjudication as a mode of social ordering. It further cautions that pursuing predictability while disregarding the low level of shared understandings regarding investment protection may cause more legitimacy problems than it solves

Sovereign rights in Exclusive economic zones and Continental shelves are functionally limited to the economic exploitation of these zones. Moreover, in the case of disputed maritime zones these sovereign rights are neither exclusive nor necessarily constant. Nevertheless, states are still expected to provide the investments established in these zones the same treatment they should provide in their territories where they exercise full and constant sovereignty. If a host state agrees to the establishment of an investment in a maritime zone that become later contested, do the occurrence of the contestation and the hazards arising from such contestation relief the host state from its contractual and treaty obligations toward the investment by virtue of the force majeure concept. This paper argues that a traditional interpretation of the force majeure concept in respect of investment agreements and contracts, hampers states ability to de-escalate their maritime disputes, diminishes its capacity to conclude delimitation agreements and reduces the promotion of the UNCLOS III as well as its mechanisms for disputes settlement. It proposes a contextualist interpretation of the force majeure concept that is adapted to the exploitation of disputed maritime zones and states obligations under the international law of the sea. First, it examines the concept of force majeure as a doc-trinal hypothesis and its applications in international contracts and international in-vestment agreements. Second, it analyzes the legal act of maritime contestation as a force majeure event according to the possible interpretations of the concept of “force majeure”. Finally, it examines the recurrent legal implications susceptible of arising out of a contestation; provisional orders and unfavorable delimitation and their qualifica-tion as a force majeure event in the realm of investment agreements and contract.

In the Australian case of Bywater Investments Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation; Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (the Bywater case) the Australian High Court dealt with the question of whether certain companies were resident in Australia for income tax purposes. The majority answered this question by applying Australian domestic law. In a separate but concurring judgement, Gordon J also discussed the interpretation and application of the relevant double taxation treaty. This contribution analyses Gordon J's judgment to extract guidance from it for the South African courts on their interpretation of double taxation treaties. It is submitted that South African courts should also follow the "first step" proposed by Gordon J when interpreting double taxation treaties. South African courts may find Gordon J's judgment "instructive" when dealing with the interpretation of the "place of effective management" concept in both domestic law and double taxation treaties. In his judgment Gordon J favours the goal of common interpretation and it is argued that South African courts should follow this example and explicitly support this notion in applicable cases. From Gordon J's judgment and the judgement in Krok v Commissioner, South African Revenue Service, it is deduced that the positions in South Africa and Australia are similar in that the courts in both countries will be bound by the principles of Articles 31 and 32 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties when interpreting double taxation treaties. Moreover, Gordon J's judgment indicates that the domestic principles of interpretation should not be used in the interpretation of double taxation treaties. Recent South African cases have suggested that there are no differences between the South African domestic principles of interpretation and those contained in Articles 31 and 32 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. This contribution submits that there are many similarities between the two, but that the rules are not exactly the same. South African courts should be aware of these differences and rather apply the rules of public international law, including those contained in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, when they interpret double taxation treaties. Gordon J specifically identifies the category of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties in which he places the Commentary on the OECD Model Tax Convention, to rely on it for his interpretation of the relevant double taxation treaty. South African courts may well learn from this approach, to create more certainty in the process of interpreting a double taxation treaty.

This thesis consists of two separate, but related studies on the development of accounting in Africa in the era of International Financial Reporting Standards. The first part of this thesis presents the first empirical test of a hypothetical classification of financial reporting in Africa based on de facto or actual practices as opposed to de jure rules. Three multivariate techniques (principal component analysis, cluster analysis, and multidimensional scaling) were used to analyse the accounting policies of large, listed companies in Africa that are required by law to adopt IFRS. It was found that there is a dichotomy between the IFRS policy choices of companies in Francophone and Lusophone countries, on the one hand, and those in common law jurisdictions, on the other, thus confirming the two-group classification schemes proposed by Elad (2015) and Nobes (1983). The results of this study extend previous research by demonstrating that international differences in financial reporting in Africa have survived in the era of IFRS and that pre-IFRS regulations enshrined in national and regional charts of account appear to have influenced IFRS policy choice. Furthermore, companies in common law countries tend to provide more extensive disclosures in their IFRS financial statements than their counterparts in code law countries. These findings have important policy implications, particularly in the context of recent recommendations of the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and the Pan-African Federation of Accountants that large entities in Africa adopt IFRS. The systematic differences in the choice of IFRS options between companies in civil law and common law jurisdictions suggest that it would be difficult to achieve internationalcomparability and consistency in financial reporting. The second part of the study uses semi structured telephone interviews to undertake interpretive accounting research (Baker and Bettner, 1997, p.293) to assess the perception of accounting professionals in relation to IFRS adoption and its use in Ghana. It concludes that despite the problems associated with its adoption and implementation, overall, International Financial Reporting Standards are viewed as necessary for the financial reporting needs of the country.

Amid COVID-19 pandemic lockdown in the year 2020, Economic Community of West African States hereafter called ECOWAS quietly celebrated its forty-five years of establishment. Widely, much was not heard of or written about the community probably due to the challenges of the pandemic. However, the address of the President of ECOWAS Commission to the staff of ECOWAS institutions on the occasion of the commemoration of the community’s forty-fifth anniversary serves as a reminder that attention should also be given to this regional giant against all odds. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to celebrate ECOWAS at forty-five and then examine whether it is a fool at forty that is proverbially referred to as a fool forever. The paper, through thorough examination of the data collected from secondary sources finds that ECOWAS is still far from achieving its main mandate, its achievements as orchestrated by His Excellency, the President notwithstanding. The paper argues that the postponement of the establishment of ECO, a common currency for the region for the sixth time from 2020 to yet to be announced date, lack of realistic free movement of persons and goods among members and selfish interests of its leaders in the guise of national interest are enough reasons to conceive ECOWAS as a fool at forty-five. With the aid of constructivist theory,it concludes that even if ECOWAS at forty-five is still fooling around it has the chances of not being a fool forever if the leaders should turn a new leaf and pursue the attainment of the community’s mandate before its fiftieth anniversary.

Consumer protection laws have not evolved on par with the development of electronic media. As a result, consumer protection laws do not address all major areas of legal concern that affect the electronic commerce (e-commerce) consumer. Furthermore, differing laws in the area of consumer protection make harmonised consumer protection neigh on impossible. Currently, there is a plethora of laws on the protection of consumers but most of these laws are within the sphere of conventional consumer protection legislation which does not adequately address the legal challenges posed by the proliferation of electronic transactions (e-transactions). Specific e-transaction laws are now to be found in certain international and regional documents emanating from organisations including: the United Nations (UN); the Council of Europe; the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD); the African Union (AU); the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS); the Southern African Development Community (SADC); the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA); and the East African Community (ECA). These legal instruments have already been implemented in certain states’ national legislation, while other countries have yet to accede to them. Despite these legal instruments, e-commerce consumers are faced with inadequate or obsolete legislative provisions and are yet to enjoy full protection equivalent to that accorded to the “traditional” consumer. Furthermore, given the trans-national nature of the internet, divergent laws will inevitably prove to provide inadequate protection to e-commerce consumers. In this research, international and regional legislative instruments, as well as the national laws of selected countries such as the United States (US), the United Kingdom (UK), the Republic of South Africa (South Africa), the Federal Republic of Nigeria (Nigeria), and the Commonwealth of Australia (Australia) are examined. The strengths and gaps in each of these instruments and laws are identified with the aim of harmonising the principles they espouse in a single, cogent, and comprehensive body of rules which could take the form of an international convention. An international convention should be based on national and international best practices. The national adoption of the minimum standards espoused in the proposed Convention will ultimately, promote harmonisation.

ENGLISH ABSTRACT: How do members hold their own trade unions accountable in South Africa? What legal mechanisms, if any, are available to assist union members in receiving adequate representation and service from their unions? This study approaches these questions through a comparative and historical examination of the regulation of the union member relationship in the UK, USA and the RSA. The study commences with an examination of what unions do, how they function and what benefits potentially accrue to their members, while the role played by unions in utilising collectivisation to offset the bargaining power of employers is demonstrated. The need for organised labour, by society in general, but South Africa specifically, is brought into sharp relief. This is, however, offset by the examination of 25 constitutions of broadly representative South African trade unions, where the lack of proper regulation of the union-member relationship is brought to the fore. This already means the common law and current judicial approach that is so reliant on the interpretation and implementation of trade union constitutions to address union-member disputes is unsuitable, certainly in those instances where the constitution is either silent or ambiguous, or where the nature of the relationship between the union and its member(s) mimics that of the constantly present imbalance of power and influence between employers and employees. The comparative examination of union accountability is undertaken against the backdrop of the common historical phases of proscription, acknowledgement/assimilation, and readjustment of and towards trade unions. The historical and contemporary regulation of the union-member relationship in South Africa is examined in the same way. The study demonstrates that purely statutory regulation of the union member relationship by means of punitive provisions and inter-union self-regulation measures are not feasible. A series of possible legal mechanisms – that draw from the comparative examination – are suggested, even though they are to be utilised in a collective (rather than individual) way. Even these suggestions, however, are subject to the challenges of cost-effectiveness, accessibility and efficiency of enforcement by (the) average union member(s). Three proposals are made to foster improved union member accountability: Firstly, the use of section 103A of the LRA by the Registrar so as to place unions that meet the appropriate criteria under administration, in order to restore accountable functioning and elevate the interests of the member(s) over that of the officials of the union; secondly, the introduction of a duty of fair representation – to be administered by the CCMA – to hold both union and employer accountable to members, and; thirdly, in conjunction with the first two proposals, the use of a package of further measures (and an associated information campaign), such as bolstering the financial/institutional capacity of the Registrar’s office, compelling the inclusion of accountability clauses within union constitutions, and minor amendments to the LRA with regard to balloting, reporting/transparency (and the enforcement thereof). If implemented, the expected outcomes are improved labour relations, increased accountability and professionalisation of trade union administration, a realignment of the employer-union divide and elevating the awareness of union member rights and concomitant obligations on trade unions – all of which are of critical importance in South Africa’s post-Marikana society.

ENGLISH ABSTRACT: The maxim, that copyright law does not protect ideas, is frequently challenged when the established principles are tested against new forms of expression or exploitation of a work. The evolution of computer programs, its unique characteristics and the increasing value of software as a commodity have resulted in a strained relationship between copyright law and the public interest regarding access to the underlying ideas in a computer program. This work examines the misalliance between copyright principles and the technical nature of computer programming, with a specific focus on the act of decompiling an existing program where it is undertaken in order to understand the underlying ideas and techniques. The impetus for this analysis is the sui generis classification of computer programs in South African copyright law and the potential this offers for development of domestic law in pursuit of national policy goals. This work conducts a normative analysis of the law and the technical reality of decompilation, from the perspective that copyright law must maintain a clear separation between the idea and the expression. The review of national and foreign copyright law is, throughout, conducted with a perspective on the effect of protection and a critical examination of the degree to which the law maintains an adequate balance between the private and public interests in the protection of software. In this respect, the current legal position is evaluated and a different, normative and prodevelopmental perspective regarding decompilation is proposed. It is submitted that are balancing of interests is justified and essential in order to establish an appropriate level of fairness and, at the same time, stimulate progress in this industry. It is argued that the act of using computer code to discover its meaning should not amount to infringement in the form of reproduction or adaptation of the work. It is found that the perception of decompilation, as a form of infringement, relies on an analogy to literary work. This view, it is argued, is ill suited to the nature of computer programs, at odds with the sui generis classification in SA copyright law, causes overbroad protection and violates the idea/expression separation. In light of the technical review of decompilation, it is found that the legal basis for prohibiting decompilation as a form of infringement is narrower than commonly assumed and that copyright law principles should be reinterpreted purposefully to permit decompilation. This work advocates that decompilation must be permissible and that an exemption, in SA copyright law, which is limited to decompilation for interoperability alone, is not appropriate in light of the national developmental agenda. Therefore, an alternative exemption is proposed which accommodates the technical reality of decompilation, the public interest in access to ideas and the commercial interests of copyright owners. This approach is supported by an analysis of international copyright law and is based on the inherent flexibilities of the three-step test. The justification for the findings of this work and the proposed departure from foreign precedent is supported by a close examination of the effect of a limited decompilation exception in foreign law and the impact of legislative measures to restrict circumvention of technological protection measures.

La commercialisation de la microfinance a mis au premier plan la performance financière des I MF, les IMF adoptant désormais une logique commerciale de rentabilité en plus de leur logique sociale établie de lutte contre la pauvreté. Cela pose un défi de gestion crucial pour les IMF pour équilibrer l'aspect social et commercial de leur mission. Cette thèse vise à analyser comment les IMF surmontent leurs défis pour atteindre leur double objectif social et commercial. Elle s'appuie sur le concept de bricolage comme perspective théorique et sur une approche méthodologique abductive, exploratoire et qualitative. La thèse vise également à fournir une meilleure compréhension du secteur de la microfinance camerounaise, en termes de son histoire et évolution, et des défis spécifiques au secteur. L'étude identifie diverses pratiques de bricolage que les IMF utilisent pour faire avancer la réalisation de leur double mission. Les résultats suggèrent l'utilisation de ces pratiques de bricolage par les IMF pour mobiliser des ressources, renforcer la légitimité et accroître leur ou/reach, dans un contexte caractérisé par des contraintes de ressources. Ces trois résultats de bricolage se renforcent mutuellement pour faciliter la réalisation du double objectif des IMF. Cette recherche a également mis en évidence les quatre phases d'évolution du secteur de la microfinance camerounaise et les cinq principaux défis auxquels sont confrontées les IMF du secteur. Cette thèse contribue à la littérature sur la microfinance. Elle propose un nouvel regard sur la gestion de la double mission des IMF en montrant comment les IMF mobilisent les stratégies de bricolage pour faire avancer leurs objectifs sociaux et commerciaux. Elle met en lumière le lien entre la littérature sur la microfinance et le bricolage.

This paper’s foundation is the global character of (harmful) tax competition. While this phenomenon’s global existence is widely recognised alongside the…

This article is devoted to the complex analysis of the English legislation of the international commercial arbitration. The author analyzed the commercial disputes and the bodies that proceed these disputes in England as well as main statutes regulating the international commercial arbitrations of England. The international commercial practices of the London International Court of Arbitration are described. Moreover, the author represents the main conclusions formed on the basis of the provisions of the national legislation on commercial arbitration and the regulations of the most well-known international arbitrations in England.

There is substantial scholarship on the limitations that international investment agreements (IIAs) place on States’ authority to regulate in the public interest. An area of fundamental importance that has not received scholarly attention in connection with IIAs is public procurement regulation. Given that public procurement is about the needs of States and their citizens, States would want to retain their authority within municipal public procurement laws to decide with whom to contract to meet those needs, and to pursue socioeconomic and industrial policies through procurement. However, most States are parties to IIAs, which impose obligations on them with respect to the protection of foreign investment. This article explores this seminal issue of whether IIAs stand to limit the authority of States in the implementation of procurement legislation and policies. Based on textual analysis and arbitral case study, it argues that treaty-based standards of investment protection can limit States’ authority on the implementation of methods of procurement (such as national competitive tendering or restricted tendering) and socioeconomic policies in procurement. A question that needs fuller engagement is the extent of conflict between specific IIAs and public procurement laws and policies, either regionally or globally, and how to reconcile conflicting obligations to promote foreign investment and sustainable development. This article provides the foundation for such future research.

This paper examines the ongoing transition to the revised Organisation for the Harmonisation of Business Law in Africa Act on Accounting and Financial Reporting for companies in general and to the International Financial Reporting Standards for listed and group companies with a particular focus on recent institutional developments and corporate concerns. The study used 80 professional accountants, most of whom were members of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Cameroon and academics. Using the descriptive statistics, the study shows that the transition to the revised OHADA brings about a high level of comparability and transparency of the financial statements, that the International Financial Reporting Standards can be implemented in Cameroon (but not fully), and that the benefit of the transition exceeds the cost.