Bibliographie sélective OHADA

No abstract provided.

In recent years, investor-State tribunals have often permitted shareholders' claims for reflective loss despite the well-established principle of no reflective loss applied consistently in domestic regimes and in other fields of international law. Investment tribunals have justified their decisions by relying on definitions of "investment" in investment agreements that often include "shares", while the no-reflective-loss principle is generally justified on the basis of policy considerations pertaining to the preservation of the efficiency of the adjudicatory process and to the protection of other stakeholders, such as creditors. Although these policy considerations militating for the prohibition of shareholders' claims for reflective loss also apply in investor-State arbitration, they are curable in that context and must be balanced with policy considerations specific to the field of international investment law that weigh in favor of such claims: the protection of foreign investors in order to promote trade and investment liberalization.

Upon the recognition that the implementation of the judicial management process would not be the success that it was anticipated it would be, it became apparent that there was need for a system of corporate rescue appropriate to the needs of a modern South African economy. The legislature then introduced a new business rescue regime when the Companies Act 71 of 20082 (the Act) came into effect in the South African law. This new Act remarkably changed corporate law. One of the central features of the Act is the introduction of business rescue- a procedure which provides for the rehabilitation of financially distressed companies in a manner that seeks to balance the rights of all stakeholders. These provisions are said to be the appropriate method for modern South African economy and they differently affect the stakeholders of a company. This thesis will be discussing the different rights given to affected persons in the new Companies Act and examine how the provisions of business rescue affect different stakeholders of the company and compare such effects with those experienced under judicial management, specifically in light of the improvements of the positions of the stakeholders. Although the new business rescue is a remarkable improvement from the old judicial management system, there is still room for improvement.

Arbitration is a way to resolve disputes outside the courts as a form of an alternative dispute resolution. The submitted dispute will be decided by one or more arbitrators, who will then render an arbitral award. One of the most fundamental principles of arbitration that must be adhered to by all arbitrators worldwide is the impartiality and independence of arbitrators, which have been regulated in various International laws. Arbitrators are not allowed to communicate with any party related to the case they are hearing. Further, arbitrators should not be influenced by others in making their decision and drafting the arbitral award to ensure objectivity and prevent any bias. An arbitrator's failure to act impartial and independent can lead to the invalidity or annulment of an arbitral award.

In a globalized world, arbitration plays an increasing role in settling international disputes. Almost all areas of Law are or might be concerned. Until very recently, [international] taxation was - as a rule - seen as a not ‘arbitrable-friendly’ matter. As the ‘classical’ method of settling international tax disputes - i.e., based on the so-called ‘Mutual Agreement Procedure’ (shortly, ‘M.A.P.’) - has shown its limits (mainly: lack of efficiency and involvement from the taxpayers themselves), arbitration became a subject of study for well-known and established academics and even an appropriate method of settling such international tax issues. As a result, both on international (O.E.C.D.) and European levels, legal initiatives have been taken, in order to promote arbitration as an additional tool of settling disputes in the field of international taxation. The purpose of the present article is, therefore, to describe and scrutinize these [very] recent legal initiatives and raise some potential issues that, at least in the author’s view, need to be addressed. One of these issues concerns the enforcement of such arbitral decisions.

No abstract available.

La relation entre les traites internationaux d’investissement et les contrats sous-jacents reste un sujet très contentieux dans le domaine du droit international de l’investissement. Cette thèse explore l’interaction entre le contrat et le traité en utilisant la renégociation des contrats règlementaires dans le secteur de l’infrastructure énergétique comme un exemple d’ « expérience naturelle », en se focalisant en particulier sur les litiges arbitraux découlant de la crise économique en Argentine. A cette fin, un cadre analytique original, s’inspirant de l’économie des coûts de transaction et la théorie du contrat relationnel. Le résultat de la combinaison originelle de ces deux cadres analytiques est la construction d’une méthodologie interprétative proposant une approche d’intégration entre les deux instruments – le contrat et le traité – d’une manière apportant plus d’équilibre entre les intérêts publics et privés souvent opposés. La thèse est fondée en particulier sur trois arguments : le premier est la nature des standards dynamiques des traités comme contrats relationnels exigeant la coopération des parties à long terme. Le deuxième est le statut de ces standards vagues comme règles par défaut, complémentés par les provisions des contrats sous-jacents, qui sont aussi relationnels et fonctionnent comme « gap fillers ». Le dernier argument, normatif, est que la relation entre ces règles (par défaut) des traites et les provisions contractuels doit être déterminée par l’économie des coûts de transaction, et en particulier le but d’économiser les coûts de transaction découlant de la rationalité limitée et l’opportunisme durant l’interprétation des standards relationnels des traités.

This thematic report appraises legal provisions currently governing e-commerce transactions in Cameroon, in particular the matter of online contracts for sales of goods and services. There are uncertainties for Cameroonian consumers in the legal provisions at both regional level – via the Organisation pour l’Harmonisation en Afrique du Droit des Affaires (OHADA, the Organisation for the Harmonisation of Business Law in Africa) – and at Cameroonian national level. The report recommends steps to be taken to remedy the uncertainties.

This article is aimed to study the legal framework of directors’ duties in Ohada law. The Organization for the Harmonization of Business Laws (OHADA),is a supranational system of business laws that, as implemented in Senegal is trying to regulate all the core businesses.Ohada displays two level of mixing.Firstly,Ohada Law is supranational, it becomes part of the internal law of each state member but still remains supranational characteristics.Secondly,Ohada being at least partially French-inspired, we can  understand that the most of the countries which adopted Ohada Laws are French-speaking. The duties of Directors in Senegal are regulated mainly by the uniform companies’ act which is part of the Ohada law. It should be noted that before the adoption of Ohada, company law was governed by the code of civil obligations and in its fourth part. For companies listed on the RSE, they must comply both with the general regulations of the BRVM and with the provisions of the Uniform Companies Act concerning publicly traded companies. This article aims to illuminate the lanterns on the question of the duties of directors in Ohada law, during my research I have observed that subjects such as corporate governance in general and the duties of directors in Ohada are left stranded by most researchers. This is why this topic has an interest in reabsorbing this gap insofar as the legal framework of the duties of directors often mentions many questions because of the lack of loyalty and diligence of certain directors.

Cette thèse examine trois questions importantes dans le secteur bancaire, à savoir le risque, les fonds propres et le crédit. Elle comprend trois essais empiriques. Le premier chapitre analyse l'impact du «printemps arabe» et de la crise financière mondiale de 2007-2008 sur la stabilité du secteur bancaire dans la région MENA. Les résultats montrent que le «printemps arabe» n'a pas eu d'effet négatif sur la stabilité des banques, alors que la crise financière mondiale a considérablement réduit leur stabilité. Le deuxième chapitre étudie le rôle joué par l'environnement institutionnel dans la mise en place de coussin de fonds propres par les régulateurs ou par les banques en interne. D’après les résultats, pour que les ratios de capital réglementaire soient efficaces, l'environnement institutionnel ne doit pas être négligé lors de la mise en place de ces ratios. Le troisième chapitre étudie les différents effets des droits des consommateurs et des créanciers sur le coût des prêts. Les résultats révèlent que le coût des prêts augmente en présence de lois strictes sur la protection des consommateurs, tandis que l'augmentation des droits des créanciers réduit ce coût.

L’analisi svolta in questo lavoro ha ad oggetto le procedure adottabili in caso di fallimento, quando esse coinvolgono società costituite in gruppi di impresa. È una questione non recente che ha tuttavia avuto la sua consacrazione nel panorama internazionale solo negli ultimi anni. La grande crisi finanziaria del 2008 ha fatto sorgere la necessità di emanare nuove specifiche regole. Pertanto, l’obiettivo che questo lavoro si propone, è di analizzare tali regole, sia iure condito che iure condendo, per consentire al lettore di avere una panoramica chiara su come l’insolvenza di gruppo possa essere trattata.

This thesis addresses risks of multiple recovery, prejudice to legitimate interests of third parties, and inadequate consideration of the applicable law in shareholder claims in investment treaty arbitration. It challenges the application by investment tribunals of two basic premises: i) that shareholders are entitled to claim for damages vis-à-vis measures against the company in which they hold shares and ii) that ‘contract claims’ are to be distinguished from ‘treaty claims’. The central argument is that the failure to recognize substantive overlaps between shareholder treaty claims and contract claims risks more than one recovery, potentially prejudices third parties, and can lead to an incomplete application of the applicable law. The foundations of standing and the cause of action in shareholder treaty claims involve two complementary ideas of independence, i.e., independence of shareholder treaty rights vis-à-vis the local company’s contractual/national law rights and independence of treaty claims vis-à-vis contract claims. However, the substance of shareholder treaty claims, defined as the state measure and particularly the losses involved, is often identical to or at least overlaps considerably with related contract/national law claims. Prevailing ideas on shareholder standing and the cause of action in international investment law have provided useful conceptual tools for jurisdictional determinations. Yet they have not allowed tribunals and the literature to fully consider the implications of shareholder indirect claims. The thesis argues, first, that investment tribunals should acknowledge substantive overlaps between contract and treaty claims. Second, shareholder claims may be inadmissible when such overlap exists and there is a risk of double recovery or prejudice to third parties. Third, the substantive coincidence of treaty and contract claims calls for an integrated approach to the applicable law, where proper weight is given not only to IIA provisions but also to general international law and the national law governing the investment.

Historically, entrepreneurs have always played a central role in the development of nation states. Aside from rentier states, which depend extensively on the availability of mineral resource rents, most economically prosperous nations in the world have strong, innovative and competitive business enterprises and entrepreneurs as the bedrock of their economic development and prosperity. It was arguably because of the above historical fact that the World Bank in 1989 declared that entrepreneurs will play a central role in transforming African economies. Chapters in this book contribute to our understanding of the theory, structure and practice of entrepreneurship in diverse African countries. Case studies examined include: African multinational banks and businesses, female entrepreneurs, culture and entrepreneurship, finance and entrepreneurship and SMEs.

In principle, contracts are enforceable mutually beneficial agreements. In the event of a breach of contract, many national, supranational, and international legal systems—as well as recent European harmonization projects on private law—turn to cure regimes for the furtherance of such (assumed) contractually generated welfare. Namely, a mandatory Nachfrist-mechanism, a hierarchy of remedies, and debtor’s (in sales law: seller’s) rights to cure—before and after performance date—are normative devices intended to perform and preserve contracts, employing purportedly better, more cost-effective remedies for breach. Discussion of the utility of these legal institutions undisputedly belongs to the debate on modern contract law. In this thesis, one of these cure-oriented devices is exhaustively analyzed: the seller’s right to cure after performance date under Article 48 CISG1. Whereas according to paragraph (1) the seller—provided that certain preconditions are met—can impose subsequent performance on the aggrieved buyer, under paragraphs (2-4) they can merely offer cure within a period of time, irrespective of any preconditions. Article 48 CISG’s systematic setting, comparative law framework, origin, forerunners, preconditions for existence—general and specific—performance in practice, legal consequences—with regards to both the breach-of-contract regime and the availability of other remedies under the CISG—, and economic-behavioural implications are exegetically analysed. A particular focus is given to the allocation of contractual risk (see epigraph 3.2.9). Finally, conclusions are drawn at two levels: one concerning the CISG’s regime and another related to general Contract law. En principio, los contratos son acuerdos ejecutables mutuamente beneficiosos. En caso de incumplimiento del contrato, muchos sistemas jurídicos nacionales, supranacionales e internacionales—así como los recientes proyectos europeos de armonización en derecho privado—recurren a regímenes de subsanación para promover el bienestar que presumiblemente se ha generado con el contrato. A saber, un mecanismo de un Nachfrist obligatorio, una jerarquía de remedios y derechos del deudor (en compraventa: del vendedor) de subsanar—antes y después de la fecha de cumplimiento—son instrumentos normativos destinados a dar cumplimiento a los contratos y a preservarlos por medio de remedios, a priori, económicamente más eficientes. La discusión sobre la bondad y utilidad de estas instituciones indudablemente pertenece al planteamiento de un derecho de contratos moderno. En esta tesis se analiza exhaustivamente uno de estos instrumentos de subsanación: el derecho del vendedor a subsanar después de la fecha de entrega en virtud del artículo 48 CISG2. Mientras que de acuerdo con su párrafo (1) el vendedor –reuniendo ciertas condiciones previas– puede imponer una ulterior ejecución al comprador perjudicado; en virtud de los párrafos (2-4), éste solamente puede ofrecer una subsanación dentro de un plazo, pero independientemente de cualquier condición previa. Del citado artículo 48 se analizan exegéticamente el entorno sistemático, el marco en derecho comparado, el origen, los precursores, las condiciones previas para la existencia—generales y específicas—, su ejecución en la práctica, las consecuencias jurídicas—en el régimen del incumplimiento del contrato y en la disponibilidad de otros remedios bajo la Convención—así como las implicaciones económicas y conductuales. Se hace una contribución en relación con la asignación del riesgo contractual (véase infra 3.2.9). Finalmente, se extraen conclusiones a dos niveles: uno enfocado al régimen de la Convención y otro relativo al Derecho de contratos en general.

The study analyses the process through which investment arbitral tribunals identify and resolve conflicts between investment standards of protection and norms from other international regimes relevant for the merits of the dispute. It questions the validity behind the current approach that tribunals adopt, under which arguments based on extraneous norms are overwhelmingly unsuccessful and proposes its' transformation in three respects. First, rather than being a mere means of interpretation, as in current practice, a broader pool of international norms must be applied to the substance of investment disputes. Second, the concept of normative conflict must be broadened if one is to address the actual challenges that inter-regime conflicts pose for international law. Third, fleshing out the modalities under which one could use private international law as a source of inspiration in public international law context, the study offers best practices for approaching the types of conflict commonly found in investment disputes.

The Oil and Gas Industry Resolution originally recognised negotiation and concede to the alternative dispute resolution rather, their litigation. The paper analysed appraised the different alternative dispute resolution, formulae including mediation the doctrinal method of research which analyses all legal in others as applied. All methods relating to the dispute resolution were analysed from the library and it has formed that mediation which involves the process of resolution dispute weather the involvement of litigating is prefer for being use costly and time consuming. Litigation been so expensive and time wasting is not recommence for oil and Gas Industry.

Mercantile Law

The practice of spamming (sending unsolicited electronic communications) has been dubbed “the scourge of the 21st century” affecting different stakeholders. This practice is also credited for not only disrupting electronic communications but also, it overloads electronic systems and creates unnecessary costs for those affected than the ones responsible for sending such communications. In trying to address this issue nations have implemented anti-spam laws to combat the scourge. South Africa not lagging behind, has put in place anti-spam provisions to deal with the scourge. The anti-spam provisions are scattered in pieces of legislation dealing with diverse issues including: consumer protection; direct marketing; credit laws; and electronic transactions and communications. In addition to these provisions, an Amendment Bill to one of these laws and two Bills covering cybercrimes and cyber-security issues have been published. In this thesis, a question is asked on whether the current fragmented anti-spam provisions are adequate in protecting consumers. Whether the overlaps between these pieces of legislation are competent to deal with the ever increasing threats on electronic communications at large. Finally, the question as to whether a multi-faceted approach, which includes a Model Law on spam would be a suitable starting point setting out requirements for the sending of unsolicited electronic communications can be sufficient in protecting consumers. And as spam is not only a national but also a global problem, South Africa needs to look at the option of entering into mutual agreements with other countries and organisations in order to combat spam at a global level.

International trade can support economic development and social upliftment. However, people are often discouraged from contracting internationally due to differences in legal systems which act as a non-tariff barrier to trade. This article focuses on the private law framework regulating international contracts of sale. During the twentieth century, the problem of diverse laws was primarily addressed by global uniform law such as the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG). However, uniform law is rarely complete and has to be supplemented by national law, trade usage or party agreement. Because of gaps that exist in the CISG the Swiss government made a proposal for a new global contract law. But is this a feasible solution to the fragmentary state of international trade law? In Europe, signs of reluctance are setting in towards further harmonisation efforts. The Proposal for a Common European Sales Law (CESL) was recently withdrawn, and now Britain has voted to leave the European Union; rumour having it that more countries might follow. The current private law framework for international sales contracts consists of a hybrid system where international, national, state and non-state law function side by side. This article submits that universalism is not per se the most efficient approach to the regulation of international sales law and that economic forces require a more varied approach for business-to-business transactions. The biggest challenge, however, would be to manage global legal pluralism. It is concluded that contractual parties, the courts and arbitral tribunals can effectively manage pluralism on a case-by-case basis.            

Africa unlike other developing regions of the world has experienced declining flows of foreign direct investment (FDI).The flow of FDI is expected to result into gradual reduction in reliance on external borrowed capital and acceleration of economic development. The study examined the declining flow of FDI to the African regions as well as the impact that it has had on economic development of the region, using the proxies of Income per capita, Life expectancy and Education indices. The study made use of pooled data from thirty nine African countries within the period 1993 and 2012.The method of analysis utilized for the study was the fixed effect least-square dummy variable model, employed to estimate the impact of foreign direct investment on economic development for the selected host African countries. The study finds that foreign direct investment is statistically significant in relation to economic development for host African countries. It is therefore recommended that the governments of host countries should consider closely the sectors that FDI flows into, encourage investment domestically in such sectors such that dependence on external financial flows could be reduced, resulting in sustained increases in income, literacy level and hence improved life expectancy which are expected to result into sustained economic development.