Bibliographie sélective OHADA

6102 sayılı Türk Ticaret Kanunu (TTK) ile Türk Ticaret Hukuku'nda özellikle anonim şirketler hukukunda yapılan değişiklikler arasında imtiyazlı paylarla ilgili düzenlemeler de bulunmaktadır. Mülga 6762 sayılı Türk Ticaret Kanunundaki (eTK) hükümlere benzerlik gösteren yönleri olsa da imtiyazlı paylarla ilgili daha ayrıntılı, yenilikler getiren ve önceki Kanun döneminde karşılaşılan sorunları gidermeye çalışan düzenlemelerin yapıldığı görülmektedir. TTK'daki imtiyazlı paylarla ilgili düzenlemelerin eTK döneminde ortaya çıkan sorunları giderip gidermediğinin ya da yeni sorunlara, belirsizliklere ve tartışmalara yol açıp açmadığının tespit edilerek değerlendirilmesi amacı bu tezin yazılmasına sebep oluşturmaktadır. Birinci bölümde önce genel olarak pay kavramı, imtiyazlı payın tanınması koşulları, imtiyaz kavramının terminolojik yönü ve mevzuatımızda konuyla ilgili düzenlemelerle hukuk sistemimize esin kaynağı olan yabancı hukuk sistemlerindeki düzenlemeler incelenmiştir. Ardından, imtiyaz tanınan hakların, eşitlik ilkesi, müktesep hak ve vazgeçilmez hak ile olan ilişkilerine değinilmiş ve imtiyazlı pay kavramının nasıl tanımlanması gerektiği üzerinde durulmuştur. Tezin asıl omurgasını oluşturan ikinci bölümde, imtiyaza konu haklar, malvarlığı hakları ve yönetim hakları olarak iki asıl eksen üzerinde incelenmiştir. İkinci bölüm için en fazla tartışılmış bulunan konu, yönetim haklarında imtiyaza ilişkindir. Yönetim haklarında imtiyazı oluşturan iki alt başlık, oy hakkında imtiyaz ve yönetim kurulunda temsilde imtiyaz ayrıntılı bir şekilde incelenmeye çalışılmış, imtiyazın kanundan kaynaklanan nedenlerle engellenmesinden bahsedilmiş ve diğer haklarda imtiyaza değinilmiştir. Tezin üçüncü bölümü imtiyazların korunması konusuna ayrılmıştır. Bu bölümde imtiyazlı pay sahipleri özel kurulunun (İPSÖK) yapısı, niteliği ve toplanması ile özel kurulun onayına bağlı kararlar halka açık olan ve olmayan şirketler dikkate alınarak açıklanmıştır. Üçüncü bölümde ayrıca İPSÖK kararlarına karşı açılacak iptal davalarıyla ilgili değerlendirmeler yapılmıştır. It is observed that although there are some similarities with the previous one, the new Turkish Commercial Code, Law No: 6102, introduces more detailed and innovative arrangements which is intended to provide an answer to the problems experienced during the abrogated code was in force in relation to preference shares. It is easily can be said that, by and large, the topic "preference shares" is the one of the most radically altered topic in the new code. The main purpose of this thesis is to shed light whether these innovative arrangements in the new code actually solving the problems that is intended to solve or, rather opposite, causing new problems and ambiguities. For this purpose, the first section of this thesis is allocated to analyse the concept of "share" in general and under which conditions the preference shares are granted first and then the meaning of the concept of "preference" is investigated. It is followed by subsections devised to identify the current domestic law, and comprative law that inspried the law makers in this area. In the following subsections it is attempted to explain where preference shares stand with respect to principle of equality, vested interests and inalienable rights, and how the concept of preference shares should be defined. In the second section, which constitutes the backbone of this thesis, the rights that are being subject of the preference shares are examined on the axis of the assest rights and the administrative rights. The topic of the administrative rights attached to preference shares is the most debated topic in this section. In this context under the head of the administrative rights, the issues related to priveleges in votes and the representation on the executive board are examined seperately in two separate subsections. Also in this subsection the issues of statutory basis of the prevention of preferences and the preferences in relation to other rights are grappled. The third section of the thesis is completely devised to the issues related to the protection of the preference shares. In this section the structure, qualifications, gathering of the board of preference shares owners and the decisions subject to approval of this board are explained in the context of private and public companies. In this section the suits that could be brought for the annulment of this board decision is evaluated briefly.

Ticarî işletme, kendisine özgülenen malvarlığı unsurlarının tamamı ile kapsamlı bir organizasyon niteliğini haiz olup, ticarî ve ekonomik bir bütünlük arz etmektedir. Ticarî işletme, ticarî bir amaca özgülenen ve bütünlük arz eden yapısı gereği, tacire ait malvarlığı unsurlarından belki de en değerlisidir. Bu yapısı gereği ticarî işletme, cebri icra hukukunda alacaklıların ilk müracaat edeceği malvarlığı unsurudur. Alacaklıların borçluya ait mal veya hakların paraya çevrilmesi sonucu tatmin edilmesi, cebri icra hukukuna hâkim olan genel bir ilkedir. Ticarî işletmenin cebri icra hukukunda paraya çevrilmesi, kapsamında bulunan mal veya hakların niteliği ve çeşitliliği gözetildiğinde ayrı bir önem taşımaktadır. Ticarî işletmeye özgülenen mal veya hakların ayrı ayrı paraya çevrilmesi, bu mal veya hakların parçalanmasına sebep olacağından, işletme faaliyetinin sona ermesine yol açar. Ticarî işletme faaliyetinin devamlılığının zedelenmesi, alacaklı ve borçlu menfaatlerini doğrudan etkilediği gibi ekonomik, sosyal ve toplumsal bir kısım olumsuz etkileri de beraberinde getirir. Bu nedenle, cebri icra prosedürleri içerisinde ticarî işletme bütünlüğünün bozulmaması büyük önem arz eder. Ticarî işletmenin cebri icra yoluyla bir bütün hâlinde paraya çevrilmesi, işletmeye özgülenen mal veya hakların bütünlüğünün bozulmasının önüne geçerek, faaliyetin devamlılığını sağlayan bir paraya çevirme şekli olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Bunun yanında, ticarî işletmenin bir bütün hâlinde paraya çevrilmesi ile ayrı ayrı paraya çevirmeye nazaran daha yüksek gelir elde edilir. Çalışmamızda, öncelikle, ticarî işletmenin bir bütün hâlinde paraya çevrilmesi açısından karşılaştırmalı hukuk sistemlerinde yer alan bazı düzenlemeler incelenmiştir. Daha sonra, ticarî işletmenin bir bütün hâlinde paraya çevrilmesinin İcra ve İflâs Kanunu'nda yer alan her bir paraya çevirme türü açısından durumu ve ticarî işletmenin bir bütün hâlinde paraya çevrilmesinin yerine getirilme usulü ile paraya çevirmenin etki ve sonuçları ortaya konulmaya çalışılmıştır. A commercial enterprise has the character of a comprehensive organization with all the elements of assets specific to it, and it offers a commercial and economic integrity. A commercial enterprise, due to its structure that is specific to a commercial purpose and offers integrity, is perhaps the most valuable of the elements of the merchant's assets. Due to this structure, a commercial enterprise is the first asset element that creditors will apply for in forced execution law. The satisfaction of creditors as a result of the conversion of the debtor's goods or rights into money is a general principle that dominates the enforcement law. The conversion of a commercial enterprise into money in compulsory enforcement law is of particular importance when the nature and diversity of the goods or rights covered by it are taken into account. The conversion of goods or rights specific to the commercial enterprise into money separately leads to the termination of the business activity, as this will lead to the fragmentation of these goods or rights. Damage to the continuity of commercial business activity directly affects the interests of creditors and debtors, as well as brings with it some negative economic, social and social effects. For this reason, it is of great importance that the integrity of the commercial enterprise is not disrupted within the forced execution procedures. The conversion of a commercial enterprise into money as a whole through forced execution appears as a form of conversion into money that ensures the continuity of activity by preventing the deterioration of the integrity of the goods or rights specific to the enterprise. In addition, a higher income is obtained by converting the commercial enterprise into money as a whole than by converting it into money separately. In our study, first of all, some regulations in comparative legal systems have been examined in terms of the conversion of commercial enterprise into money as a whole. Subsequently, the situation of the conversion of the commercial enterprise into money as a whole in terms of each type of conversion contained in the Execution and Bankruptcy Code, as well as the procedure for performing the conversion of the commercial enterprise into money as a whole, as well as the effects and consequences of the conversion into money have been tried to be revealed.

Arabuluculuk tarafların tarafsız bir üçüncü bir kişinin yardımı ile ihtilaflarını çözmeye yardımcı olması olarak tanımlanabilir. Türkiye'de özel hukuktan doğan ve tarafların üzerinde serbestçe tasarruf edebilecekleri uyuşmazlıkların arabuluculuk ile çözümüne ilişkin 6325 sayılı Hukuk Uyuşmazlıklarında Arabuluculuk Kanunu'nun 2013 yılında kabulü ile arabuluculuk uygulamasına geçilmiştir. 7036 sayılı İş Mahkemeleri Kanunu ile 2018 yılı itibariyle dava şartı arabuluculuk kavramı Türk hukuk literatürüne girmiştir. 7036 sayılı İş Mahkemeleri Kanunu md.3 uyarınca kanuna, bireysel iş sözleşmesine, toplu iş sözleşmesine dayanan alacak, tazminat veya işe iade talebi ile açılan davalarda arabuluculuğa başvurulması dava şartıdır. İtalya, Almanya ve ABD'nin bazı eyaletlerinde iş hukukunda dava şartı arabuluculuk uygulaması yoktur. İngiltere'de iş mahkemelerine başvurmak için önce ACAS isimli kuruma başvurmak gerekir. ABD 'de ise iş ilişkilerindeki ayrımcılık iddiaları öncelikle EEOC'de görülmektedir. Bireysel İş Hukukunda Arabuluculuk başlıklı doktora tezi çalışmamız dört bölümden oluşmaktadır. Çalışmanın birinci bölümünde alternatif uyuşmazlık çözüm yöntemleri kavramı ve belli başlı alternatif uyuşmazlık yöntemleri irdelenerek incelenmiş, ikinci bölümde arabuluculuk kurumu, amacı, prensipleri, türleri, arabulucunun hak ve yükümlülükleri, arabulucu ve arabuluculuk sözleşmelerinin hukuki mahiyeti ve arabuluculuk etiği gibi konular çalışılmıştır. Mukayeseli İş Hukukunda Arabuluculuk başlıklı üçüncü bölümde, arabuluculuğun anavatanı olan Amerika Birleşik Devletleri, Birleşik Krallık gibi Anglo Sakson sistemindeki devletlerde, İtalya, Almanya, Fransa gibi Roma Cermen sistemindeki devletlerde ve Avrupa Birliği müktesabatında arabuluculuğun nasıl düzenlendiği ve son olarak dördüncü bölüm olan Türk İş Hukukunda Arabuluculuk başlığı altında, dava şartı arabuluculuk kavramına ilişkin konular yargı kararları da işlenerek ayrıntılı olarak irdelenmiştir. Mediation can be defined as helping parties resolve their disputes with the help of a third party. With the adoption of the Law No. 6325 on Mediation in Civil Disputes in 2013, mediation has been implemented regarding the resolution of disputes arising from private law and on which the parties can freely dispose of. As of 2018, with the adoption of the Labor Courts Law numbered 7036 the concept of mediation as a cause of action in employment disputes litigation introduced in our legal literature. Pursuant to Article 3 of Labor Courts Law numbered 7036, lawsuits filed with the demand for receivables, compensation or reemployment based on the law, individual employment contract, collective bargaining agreement are subject to mediation as a cause of action. In Italy and Germany mediation in employment disputes does not exist. In England, in order to apply to the labor courts, firstly it must be applied to ACAS. In the United States of America, for discriminatory allegations in the employment relation firstly EEOC must be addressed. The doctoral thesis titled Mediation in Individual Employment Law consists of four parts. In the first part of the study, the concept of the alternative dispute resolution methods is investigated by examining the main alternative dispute methods, in the second part, the mediation institution, its purpose, principles, types, rights and responsibilities of the mediator, the legal nature of the mediator and mediation agreemets and mediation ethics are studied. In the third part titled Mediation in Comparative Employment Law, the Anglo-Saxon countries such as the United States of America and the United Kingdom, which are the homeland of mediation, in the Roman Germanic system states such as Italy, Germany France and in European Union legal system are explained and lastly under the title of Mediation in Turkish Employment Law, which is the fourth part, the issues related to the concept of mediation as a cause of action are also discussed in detail adding judicial decisions.

Anonim şirketlerde yönetim veya temsil yetkisi kural olarak yönetim kurulu tarafından kullanılmakla birlikte, özellikle halka açık veya büyük ölçekli ortaklıklarda söz konusu yetkilerin tamamının yönetim kurulu tarafından bizzat yerine getirilmesi uygulamada sık rastlanan bir durum değildir. Bu nedenle kanunda, yönetim kuruluna, yönetim veya temsil yetkisinin 6102 sayılı Türk Ticaret Kanunu' nun 367/I ve 370/II hükümlerinde yer alan şartlara uygun olarak, mevcut yönetim kurulu üyelerinden bir veya birkaçına yahut üçüncü kişilere devretmek suretiyle, şirketin yönetim teşkilatını belirleme yetkisi tanınmıştır. Şirket yönetimi konusunda uzmanlaşmış ve yeterli mesleki tecrübeye sahip olan kişilere yetkilerin devredilmesi, bir yandan şirkette profesyonelleşmeyi sağlamakta, diğer yandan kural olarak, devredilen yetkilerle birlikte bu kapsamda ortaya çıkabilecek hukuki sorumluluk da devredilmiş sayılacağından, yönetim kurulu üyelerinin hukuki sorumluluğunu sınırlandırmaktadır. Yönetim veya temsil yetkilerinin geçerli bir şekilde devredilmesi halinde, devredilen yetkilerle ilgili olarak yönetim kurulu üyelerinin hukuki sorumluluğu; murahhasların seçiminde, onlara verilecek talimatlarda ve murahhasların üst gözetiminde göstermeleri gereken makul derecede özen yükümlülüğü ile sınırlı olarak devam eder. Çalışmamızda, geçerli ve geçersiz yetki devri hallerinde, yönetim kurulu üyelerinin hukuki sorumluluğunun ne şekilde ortaya çıkacağı meselesi, mehaz İsviçre hukukundaki görüş ve yargı kararlarına yer verilmek suretiyle, detaylı bir şekilde incelenmiştir. Although the management or representation authority in joint stock companies is used by the board of directors as a rule, it is not common in practice that all of the said authorities are personally exercised by the board of directors, especially in publicly held or large-scale partnerships. For this reason, in the law, the board of directors is authorized to determine the management organization of the company by delegating the management or representation authority to one or more of the existing board members or to third parties in accordance with the provisions of the Turkish Commercial Code numbered 6102, 367/I and 370/II has been recognized. Delegation of powers to people who are specialized in company management and have sufficient professional experience, on the one hand, ensures professionalization in the company, and on the other hand, as a rule, legal responsibility that may arise in this context together with the delegated powers will be deemed to have been transferred, thus limiting the legal liability of the members of the board of directors. In case of a valid transfer of management or representation powers, the legal responsibility of the members of the board of directors regarding the delegated powers; limited to the reasonable care obligation that they must show in the selection of the executive directors, in the instructions to be given to them and under the supervision of the executive directors. In our study, the issue of how the legal responsibility of the members of the board of directors will arise in cases of valid and invalid delegation of authority has been examined in detail by including the opinions and judicial decisions in the Swiss law.

It is nowadays generally accepted that international commercial arbitration is the most popular method of resolving international disputes between commercial parties. This popularity is the cumulative result of many advantages that international commercial arbitration offers to the parties. It is suggested in the literature that one of these advantages is the freedom of parties and the resulting procedural flexibility. In virtue of this principle, the parties have the opportunity to establish a specific method of adjudication adapted to the nature of their dispute. This opportunity is provided by the fact that the arbitration regulations do not include detailed rules on the collection of evidence, thus leaving the parties and the arbitrators' range of motion. Therefore, we consider that this procedural flexibility has emerged as a possibility obtained at the expense of certainty in international commercial arbitration proceedings. This uncertainty is to such an extent that it also warrants the question as to whether there is an applicable law to take evidence in international commercial arbitration proceedings. Such procedural flexibility afforded to the parties, however, comes at a price of uncertainty with respect to arbitral procedure. International commercial arbitration developed as a reaction to the failings of proceedings in domestic courts, which were subject to detailed rules of evidence. Thus, the consensus in the arbitration community is that party freedom and the procedural flexibility that comes with it are fundamental attributes of arbitration. Although this presumption is theoretically correct; in other words, the parties are indeed able to craft such a procedure that would perfectly fit for adjudication of their disputes, mostly it does not reflect the practical reality. In practice, when parties are negotiating the terms of an agreement to govern their business relationship, they generally tend to avoid discussions as to what will happen if things go wrong. As a matter of fact, according to our practice experiences, when one of the parties' legal counsel tries to address such hypothetical scenarios, the parties generally prefer to suppress such "negative thoughts" and refuse to make in-depth discussions as to how a possible dispute is to be handled. Hereby, this leaves open the question of the procedure to be followed in arbitration proceedings in case of potential disputes. As a result, the provisions on how to resolve disputes that may arise between the parties, in other words, the "dispute resolution" provisions, are left to the very end of the negotiations and passed over in a few sentences. When the relationship between the parties becomes truly strained and a dispute comes to an unavoidable stage, it becomes even less likely that the parties will agree on how to gather evidence on the dispute in question. In a such situation, any suggestions made by one party regarding the procedure for the taking of evidence will be viewed with suspicion by the other party. In an environment of suspicion and animosity, it is often unrealistic to expect productive negotiations to take place on procedural matters. As a result, although the parties have a wide range of motions to make agreements regarding the method of collecting evidence in arbitration proceedings, they are often unable to exercise this authority in practice. As the parties are not exercising their rule-making powers, this important task, which is decisive for the resolution of the dispute, shifts to the arbitrators. Therefore, in our opinion, it would not be a wrong assessment to say that the freedom of the parties has turned into the freedom of the arbitrator in practice. Once appointed, arbitrators have to decide on many issues with respect to the taking of evidence as rules applicable to arbitration are generally silent as to these matters. Although arbitrators have the opportunity to be guided by some non-binding rules, such as the IBA Rules and the Prague Rules, which are considered to be effective and instructive in the arbitration community, they are ultimately left to make their assessments and reach an award based on their judgment. The above-mentioned non-binding rules can undoubtedly assist arbitral tribunals to a certain extent with regard to the taking of evidence. However, it is not possible to say that these rules are enforceable guidelines that can be blindly followed by arbitral tribunals. A closer look at these rules reveals that they leave many issues to the discretion of the arbitral tribunals. Of course, any decision regarding the taking of evidence in international commercial arbitration is already within the discretion of the arbitral tribunals, even in the absence of these rules. Therefore, these provisions, which have been drafted to allow the arbitral tribunals to decide as they see fit, are no more than general guidance on how to exercise their discretion. For these reasons, even if the parties have agreed on the application of these non-binding rules, the fact remains that the collection and evaluation of evidence are still left to the discretion of the arbitral tribunals. This study takes an inductive approach by analyzing the normative and non-binding rules of law applicable to evidence in international commercial arbitration. Firstly, this study examines whether there is a body of rules that can be characterized as the law of evidence in international commercial arbitration. It is determined that there is a law of evidence in international commercial arbitration; however, its content is rather composed of general principles. After determining that these rules have normative value, it is examined how and to what extent these general principles are concretized in terms of the types of evidence used in international commercial arbitration. Although the degree of concretization of these principles varies according to the types of evidence, as a general characteristic, it is determined that arbitral tribunals are left with a very wide discretionary power. It is concluded that arbitral tribunals have a wide latitude of action with respect to the submission of documents, the presentation of witness testimony, the use of expert testimony, the use of discovery and the extent of the res judicata effect of a prior award. Subsequently, the rules on the admissibility and evaluation of evidence are analyzed and it is concluded that the arbitral tribunals have wide discretion in international commercial arbitration, as in other matters relating to evidence and even the discretion regarding the evaluation of evidence is relatively wider. Since it is difficult to review the discretionary power exercised in these matters, it is observed that the arbitral tribunals' decisions on evidentiary issues fall outside the scope of judicial review. This leads to a further blurring of the already grey evidentiary issues in international commercial arbitration proceedings. This is because it is not possible to determine the extent to which the arbitral tribunal has relied on evidence that ostensibly played a role during the proceedings. In the last instance, although the arbitrators' discretionary powers are limited by general principles such as due process and opportunity to be heard, the limits of such discretionary powers are, generally speaking, somewhat blurred as these are general principles. Another issue is that arbitral tribunals are often subject to pressure from the parties when making their decisions on the taking of evidence during the arbitral proceedings. The parties are more interested in being the winner of the concrete proceedings than in the proper conduct of the proceedings in accordance with the law, procedure and rules. In this sense, a party whose request for evidence is likely to be rejected will often argue that the arbitral tribunal's decision violates the principle of a fair trial, even if this is not the case. It is in these circumstances that arbitral tribunals must strike a balance between a fair trial and an efficient trial and make appropriate decisions on evidentiary issues. If arbitral tribunals emphasize procedural efficiency and defer to the parties' presentation of their claims and defences, this may not in itself constitute an obstacle to legally correct decisions. However, this would violate the fundamental procedural safeguards of the participants in the proceedings and may even lead to arbitration proceedings becoming a mechanism for arbitrary and haphazard decision-making. If the opposite approach is taken, in other words, if the priority is to uncover the material truth at all costs and the procedural economy is put on the back burner, this will result in costly and protracted proceedings that will far exceed the limits of reasonableness. Given the limited scope of the guidelines available to arbitrators on the collection and evaluation of evidence, striking this balance is not an easy task. Therefore, it is quite understandable that arbitral tribunals, when deciding on evidentiary issues, may prefer the safer route and give precedence to claims of breach of the principle of a fair trial, even at the expense of the efficiency of the proceedings. Additionally, the confidential nature of the international commercial arbitral proceedings also amplifies the problem. As a result of this principle, the available knowledge as to the practice of arbitration becomes limited to anecdotal stories as to what has happened in certain individual international commercial arbitration proceedings. The arbitrators do not have sufficient opportunity to know about how their colleagues have dealt with certain issues that may have similarities with the issues that they have been trying to solve. In conclusion, in light of the foregoing, since the arbitral tribunals are the rule-makers of arbitration proceedings, the extent to which arbitration proceedings will function correctly and efficiently depends on the experience of the arbitral tribunals and their knowledge of the law, procedure and rules. Basing a correct and efficient arbitration procedure solely on the initiative of experienced arbitrators reduces the 'certainty' of the arbitral procedure. In the face of this situation, it may be tempting to argue that it is inappropriate for arbitrators to have so much freedom and that the rules applicable to arbitral proceedings should be revised to be more detailed. Indeed, there are those who argue that such a change should take place. In the final analysis, a good system should be able to function well regardless of how qualified (or unqualified) its participants are. It is obvious that an argument that sees detailed procedural rules as a remedy for this would contradict the historical development of arbitration and therefore would not be accepted by the international arbitration community. Likewise, from the other side of the coin, it could be argued that detailed procedural rules that are not appropriate to the nature of the individual dispute would prevent qualified and experienced arbitral tribunals from formulating rules that are appropriate to the resolution of the dispute in question, and that the hands of arbitral tribunals may be tied in this way. Although it may be argued that these counter-arguments are equally justified, they do not negate the fact that certainty should be ensured in international commercial arbitration proceedings. Therefore, this suggests that it may be appropriate to resort to alternative methods to ensure certainty. Indeed, it would be a mistake to assume that the only way to achieve certainty is through a detailed set of rules, as we, as legal practitioners in the Continental European legal system, are accustomed to. In the countries subject to the Common Law system, many branches of law do not have such a detailed set of rules and therefore it is not possible to claim that these legal systems lack certainty. Especially in the common law, certainty is provided by case law. If the same logic were to be applied to international commercial arbitration proceedings, it would mean that making information on arbitration proceedings more accessible could help to achieve the goal of certainty. In recent years, there have been some initiatives recognizing the benefits of this approach. While arbitral tribunals are under no obligation to follow the decisions of other arbitral tribunals, having the opportunity to see that there is a consistent pattern of decisions on a particular issue would undoubtedly provide valuable guidance for arbitral tribunals. As the pool of information available to arbitral tribunals and the parties expands, it is obvious that the grey areas regarding evidence in international commercial arbitration will diminish over time. In this way, it will be possible to achieve greater certainty without undermining the fundamental values of the arbitral procedure. Reducing the uncertainty caused by procedural flexibility on procedural certainty in this way will contribute significantly to the development of international commercial arbitration.

Dünya genelinde, uyuşmazlıkların mahkeme dışında alternatif uyuşmazlık çözüm yolları ile çözülmesi konusunda artan bir eğilim bulunmaktadır. Alternatif uyuşmazlık çözüm yollarından biri de arabuluculuktur. Arabuluculuk gönüllülük esasına dayanan bir uyuşmazlık çözme biçimidir. Arabuluculuk sistemi, AB'ye üye bazı ülkeler başta olmak üzere birçok ülkede özellikle ticari uyuşmazlıklarda uygulanmakta ve sonuçları itibariyle tarafları memnun etmekte, yargının yükünün de ciddi şekilde azaltılmasına destek olmaktadır. Yargının iş yükünün hızla arttığı, yargılamadaki gecikmeler nedeniyle adalete duyulan güvenin azaldığı bir ortamda arabuluculuk uygulamaları birçok ülkeye örnek olmaktadır. Ülkemizde de arabuluculuk uygulanmaya başlanmış; hatta en sık karşılaşılan uyuşmazlıklardan iş uyuşmazlıkları, ticari uyuşmazlıklar ve tüketici uyuşmazlıkları dava şartı arabuluculuk kapsamına alınmıştır. Ticari davaların zorunlu arabuluculuk yoluyla çözülmesi uygulamada bazı sorunlara ve çelişkili yargı kararlarının ortaya çıkmasına neden olmuştur. Arabuluculuk, Ticari Davalar, Ticari Davalarda Arabuluculuk, Avrupa Birliği, Zorunlu Arabuluculuk, Alternatif Uyuşmazlık Çözüm Yolları, Dava Şartı Arabuluculuk, Uzlaşma. There is an increasing trend around the world related with the resolution of disputes through alternative dispute resolution methods out of court. One of the alternative dispute resolution methods' is mediation. Mediation is a form of dispute resolution on a voluntary basis. The mediation system is applied especially in commercial disputes in many countries, also in some member countries of European Union. The mediation not only satisfies the parties in terms of its results but also helps to reduce the burden of the judiciary. In a world where the workload of the judiciary increases rapidly and trust in justice decreases due to delays in the trial, commercial mediation practices in European countries set an example for many other countries. Mediation is not also practised in Turkiye but also mandatory in labor disputes, commercial disputes and consumer disputes. Contradiction and discrepancy between the court decisions and other judicial problems arised arised as a result of mandatory mediation. Mediation, Commercial Disputes, Mediation in Commercial Disputes, European Union, Mandatory Mediation, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Condition of Litigation, Commercial Mediation. Reconciliation, Voluntary Mediation

Multimodal taşıma; multimodal taşıma sözleşmesine binaen multimodal taşıma operatörünün eşyaların bir yerden farklı yerdeki teslimat için belirlenmiş bir noktaya taşınmasını en az iki farklı taşıma türü ile gerçekleştirmeyi taahhüt ettiği bir taşımadır. Konteyner kullanımının yaygınlaşması, günümüzde uluslararası eşya taşımalarının birden fazla taşıma türü kullanılarak kapıdan kapıya şeklinde yapılmasına olanak sağlamıştır. Bu sayede multimodal taşıma tüm dünyada yaygın hale gelmiştir. Taşıma sektöründe sıklıkla kullanılan bu taşıma türünün hukuki açıdan izahı önem arz etmektedir. Bu sebeple, multimodal taşımanın tanımı ve unsurları ele alınmıştır. Bu taşımanın diğer taşıma türleri ile benzerlik ve farklıkları değerlendirilmiştir. Her bir taşıma türüne ilişkin konvansiyonlar, ülkelerin ulusal hukuk düzenlemeleri ve multimodal taşımaya ilişkin yeknesak kurallar oluşturma amacıyla getirilen düzenleme çalışmaları ve düzenlemeler göz önüne alındığında multimodal taşımaya hangi hukuk düzenlemelerinin uygulanacağını öngörmek zordur. Multimodal taşımalarda sorumluluğu yeknesaklaştırmak adına en önemli düzenlemeler 1975 ve 1992 tarihli Milletlerarası Ticaret Odası (ICC) Kuralları ve halen yürürlüğe girmemiş olan 1980 Tarihli Multimodal Taşıma Konvansiyonu (MTC), 2009 tarihinde imzaya açılan Eşyaların Tamamen veya Kısmen Deniz Yoluyla Uluslararası Taşınmasına İlişkin Konvansiyondur (Rotterdam Kuralları-RK). Bu düzenlemelerden esinlenilerek ortaya çıkmış çeşitli bölgesel düzenlemeler söz konusudur. Bunun yanı sıra multimodal taşımanın ülke sınırları içerisinde gerçekleşebilmesi sebebiyle bazı ülkeler bu konuyu düzenleyen kanunlar yapmışlardır. Türk Hukunda ise multimodal taşımaya ilk kez 6102 sayılı Türk Ticaret Kanunu'nda (TTK), 'Değişik Tür Araçlar İle Taşıma' başlığı altında yer verilmiştir. MTO'nun zıya, hasar ve geç teslime dayalı sözleşme kaynaklı sorumluluğu zarar yerinin belirlenebilir olup olmamasına göre farklı kurallara tabidir. Zarar yerinin belirlenmesi ve multimodal taşıma sözleşmesinin taraflarından birinin zararın hangi taşıma türünde oluştuğunu ispatlaması durumunda, multimodal taşıma birden fazla taşıma türünü içerdiğinden denizyolu, havayolu, karayolu, demiryolu ve ülke iç suyolu gibi her bir taşıma türünü ayrı ayrı düzenleyen ve her biri kendi sorumluluk rejimini içeren uluslararası unimodal (tekil) taşıma konvansiyonlarından usulüne göre yürürlüğe girmiş olanları öncelikli olmak üzere, ilgili taşıma türünü özel olarak düzenleyen kurallar uygulanacaktır. Zararın gerçekleştiği taşıma türünün tespit edilememesi durumunda genel hüküm olarak adlandırabileceğimiz TTK hükümleri uygulama alanı bulacaktır. Çalışmada, Türk Hukukunda MTO'nun sorumluluğu ilgili konvansiyonlar ve TTK ışığında ele alınmış, uygulanacak hükümler ortaya konmaya çalışılmıştır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Multimodal Taşıma, Multimodal Taşıma Sözleşmesi, Multimodal Taşıma Operatörü, Multimodal Taşıma Operatörünün Sorumluluğu. Multimodal transport is a carriage in which multimodal transport operator, who assumes the responsibility of performing the carriage under the multimodal transport contract, undertakes to perform the carriage of goods by at least two modes of transport from one place to another place designated for delivery. Widespread use of containers today allows international transport of goods to be in the form of door-to-door transport using more than one mode of transport. Thus, multimodal transport becomes more widespread all over the world. Explaining this mode of transport, which is frequently used in the transport industry, from the legal perspective is of high importance. Hence, in this study, the definition and elements of multimodal transport are studied. The similarities and differences of this mode of transport with other modes of transport are evaluated. Considering different conventions regulating each mode of transport, national transport legislations and regulations aimed at setting forth uniform provisions, it is clearly difficult to determine rules that are applicable for the multimodal transport contract. Major regulations to uniform the liability in multimodal carriages are the 1975 and 1992 International Chamber of Commerce Rules, the 1980 Multimodal Transport Convention (MTC) and the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea (Rotterdam Rules-RT), which was open for signature in 2009. There are also regional regulations inspired by these instruments. In addition, a number of countries enact laws regulating multimodal transport, as multimodal transport may be performed within national boundaries, and there are no uniform rules regulating it. In Turkish law, certain rules on multimodal transport in the Turkish Commercial Law (TTK) No.6102 under the heading of 'Carriage by Various Modes of Transport (Multimodal Transport)' were introduced. The MTO's contractual liability for loss of or damage to goods or delay in delivery is subject to different rules depending on whether the place of loss can be located. If the place of loss is located, and the leg of transport in which the loss occurs is proved by any party of the multimodal transport contract, as the transport involves more than one mode of transport, rules specifically regulating that mode of transport, in particular unimodal conventions, which duly entered into effect, individually governing each mode of transport such as sea, air, road, rail and inland waterway transports and having its own liability regime, will be applicable. If the mode of transport in which the loss occurs cannot be ascertained, TTK provisions, which we may call general rules, will be applicable. In the present study, we analyse the liability of MTO within the framework of relevant conventions and TTK and seek to reveal applicable provisions. Keywords: Multimodal Transport, Multimodal Transport Contract Multimodal Transport Operator, Liability of Multimodal Transport Operator

Bu tez, anlaşmazlıkları çözmede arabuluculuk konusunu ele almaktadır. Arabuluculuk konusu ticari mali muamelelerdeki anlaşmazlıklar ile sınırlıdır. Dolayısıyla tez ailevi anlaşmazlıklardaki nafaka gibi diğer mali anlaşmazlıklara değinmemektedir. Tez konusu fıkhi açıdan ele alındığı için, dört fıkhi mezhebin konuyla ilgili görüşleri, mukayeseli olarak işlenmiş, mezhepler arasında ihtilaf ve ittifak edilen noktalar ele alınmış ve görüşler arasında tercih yapılarak ortaya konulmuştur. Tez; bir mukaddime, üç bölüm, bir sonuç ve kaynakçadan meydana gelmektedir. Mukaddime de tezin planı, fihrist ve içerik ele alınmıştır. Tezin birinci bölümünde; arabuluculuk kavramının tanımı ve meşruiyeti, ikinci bölümde; arabuluculuğun rükünleri ve arabuluculukla ilgili hükümler ve şartlar, üçüncü bölümde ise; arabuluculuğun sonuçları ve etkisi ele alınmıştır. The dissertation aims to cover the subject of mediation in dispute resolutions exclusively in commercial disputes. Therefore, the research does not cover mediation in other disputes such as domestic disputes even when it's related to financial matters such as alimony. The research also studies mediation in commercial disputes from a jurisprudential perspective. Hence the jurists' opinions are presented and analyzed in a comparative approach to show its similarities, differences and present a jurisprudential preference. The dissertation is presented in an introduction, three chapters, a conclusion followed by the list of references and resources. The introduction provides an insight into the research contents and methodology. The first chapter discuss the definition of mediations and its legitimacy. The second chapter tackle the main pillars of mediations and clarify its ruling and conditions. Finally, the third chapter view the results of mediations and its expected impacts.

Deniz ticaret hukukunda, varma limanında yükün teslimini talep eden kişi, gönderilen olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Gönderilen, navlun sözleşmesinin tarafı olan taşıtan olabileceği gibi sözleşme ilişkisi dışında üçüncü bir kişi de olabilir. Gönderilenin üçüncü kişi olması hâlinde navlun sözleşmesi üçüncü kişi yararına sözleşme olarak nitelendirilmektedir. Kanun koyucu, sözleşme ilişkisine taraf olmayan bu üçüncü kişi için de bir takım hak ve sorumluluklar getirmiştir. İşte bu çalışmanın konusunu üçüncü kişi sıfatını haiz gönderilenin navlun sözleşmesinden kaynaklanan sorumluluğu oluşturmaktadır. Sözleşmelerin nispiliği prensibi gereği kural olarak tarafların anlaşarak üçüncü kişiyi borç altına sokmaları mümkün değildir. Bununla birlikte üçüncü kişi gönderilenin hangi hallerde sorumlu olacağı TTK m. 1203'te düzenlenmiştir. Buna göre gönderilenin navlun sözleşmesi kapsamında sorumlu olması için ilk olarak eşyanın teslimini talep etmesi gerekmektedir. Eşyanın teslimini talep, üçüncü kişi lehine sözleşme teorisi açısından edimin kabulü olarak değerlendirilmekte ve haliyle gönderilenin borç altına girmesi tarafların kararlaştırması ile değil öncelikle kendi iradesi ile olmaktadır. Gönderilenin sorumlu tutulmasının diğer şartını, teslim talebinin dayandığı taşıma sözleşmesinde ya da deniz taşıma senetlerinde bu borçların gönderilen üzerine bırakılması oluşturmaktadır. Dolayısıyla gönderilenin yükün teslimi sözleşmeden ya da deniz taşıma senetlerinden kaynaklanan bu alacakların ödenmesi şartına bağlanmaktadır. Gönderilenin hangi alacaklardan sorumlu olduğu sözleşme şartlarına göre tespit edilmektedir. Bu kapsamda sözleşme kayıtlarının incelenmesi gerekir. Navlun sözleşmesinde gönderilen uygulamada genellikle denizaşırı alıcı olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Dolayısıyla Incoterms uyarınca tarafların kararlaştırdığı teslim şekillerinin ve FIO/FIOST/FILO/LIFO gibi gönderilenin sorumluluğunu genişleten kayıtların incelenmesi önemlidir. Bu kapsamda gönderilenin navlun sözleşmesinden kaynaklanan hangi borç kalemlerinden sorumlu olduğu sözleşme hükümleri ve mevzuat ile ayrıntılı bir şekilde açıklanmıştır. The consignee is defined as a person who requesting the delivery of the cargo at the discharge port by the maritime commercial law. The consignee might be the shipper, as a party of contract of affreightment, or might be a third party of the contract. In the case of the consignee is a third party, the contract of affreightment is characterized as a third-party beneficiary contract in which determined rights and responsibilities are given to this third party by the law makers. This thesis aims to determine the responsibilities of the third-party consignee that arising from the contract of affreightment. With regard to privity of the contract principle, as a rule, parties of a contract do not have right to bind a third party with obligations. On the other hand, the conditions of responsibilities of the third party consignee is regulated in the article 1203 of TCC. With regard to the article, in order for the consignee to be liable under the freight contract, the consignee must first request the delivery of the goods. The demand for the delivery of the goods is considered as the acceptance of the performance in terms of the theory of third party beneficiary contract and as a matter of fact, the consignee do not incur a debt with the parties' decision, but primarily with his own will. The other condition of holding the consignee responsible is the transfer of these debts to the consignee in the contract of affreightment or other transport documents on which the delivery request is based. Therefore, the delivery of the cargo is subject to the payment of these debts arising from the contract or transport documents. The debts of the consignee are determined according to the terms of the contract. In this context, it is necessary to review of the terms of the contract. In practice, the consignee in the contract of affreightment usually appears as a overseas receiver of the sale contract. Therefore, it is important to examine both the delivery methods agreed by the parties with regard to INCOTERMS and clauses that expand the responsibility of the sender, such as FIO/FIOST/FILO/LIFO. In this framework, this study explains in detail the responsibilities of consignee with regard to freight contract provisions and legislations.

Yapay zekâ teknolojileri, insan unsurunun egemen olduğu pek çok alanı etkisi altına almaya hazırlanmaktadır. Bu alanlar arasında tıp, hukuk, eğitim, mühendislik olduğu gibi ticaret de bulunmaktadır. Yapay zekâ teknolojileri, özellikle şirketler hukukunun geleneksel yapısını kökünden sarsacak yeni bir ticari düzen ve anlayış yaratma yolundadır. Karar alma süreçlerini otomatikleştiren yapay zekâ teknolojilerinin verimliliği ve hızı, şirketlerin bu sistemleri geliştirerek pazarlamalarının yanı sıra bizzat şirket bünyelerine katarak kullanma eğilimi göstermelerine de yol açmaktadır. Bu şekilde kendi kendini besleyen bu döngü, yapay zekâ alanına sermaye yapısı güçlü şirketlerin yönelmesini ve araştırma kapsamının gittikçe genişletilmesini sağlamaktadır. Şirketlerdeki bu yönelim neticesinde, hızla gelişen yapay zekâ teknolojilerinin geleneksel şirket yapılarını etkileyebilme potansiyelinin yükselmesi olgusu, şirketler hukukunun geleceği üzerine bir inceleme yapılması gerekliliğini ortaya çıkarmaktadır. Çalışmamızda şirket yönetiminde yapay zekâ teknolojilerinin kullanımına ve bunun hukuki sonuçlarına odaklanılmakta ve konu dört temel bölüme ayrılarak incelenmektedir. Giriş bölümünde kısaca çalışmanın konusu, önemi, amacı, kapsamı ve sistematiği açıklanmakta, yapay zekâ ve şirket yönetiminin kavramsal çerçevesine yer verilmektedir. Birinci bölümde şirketler hukuku ve yapay zekâ teknolojilerinin etkileşimi incelenmektedir. Bu bölümde yapay zekâ teknolojilerinin ticaret hukuku ve şirketler hukuku ile etkileşimi incelenmekte, dijitalleşmenin şirketler hukukuna etkileri, özellikle şirket yapılarındaki ve menfaat çatışmalarındaki dönüşüm çerçevesinde ele alınmaktadır. İkinci bölümde, şirket yönetiminde yapay zekâ teknolojilerinin kullanılması bir süreç olarak incelenmektedir. Kullanım kararı alınmasından başlamak üzere, şirkete uygun yapay zekâ teknolojilerinin edinimi ve bu teknolojilerinin şirket yönetiminde kullanılma yöntemlerinin araştırıldığı bu bölümde, teknik, hukuki ve ticari başta olmak üzere ilgili beklenti ve belirsizlikler araştırılmaktadır. Üçüncü bölümde şirket yönetiminde yapay zekâ teknolojilerinin kullanılmasının hukuki sonuçları ve hukukun bu dönüşümden nasıl etkileneceği üzerinde durulmaktadır. Son bölümde ise yönetimin geleceği üzerine düşüncelerin yer altığı bir karar ağacı tasarımı içeren interaktif bir bölüme yer verilmektedir. Artificial intelligence technologies are preparing to influence many human-dominated and human-related fields. These fields include medicine, law, education, engineering as well as commerce. Artificial intelligence technologies are on the way to create a new commercial order and understanding that will shake up the traditional structure of corporate law. In particular, the efficiency and speed of artificial intelligence technologies that automate decision-making processes have led companies to tend to use these systems both by developing and marketing them and by incorporating them. In this way, this self-sustaining cycle has led companies with strong capital structures to move towards the field of artificial intelligence, and the scope of research has been gradually expanded. This orientation in companies and the high potential of rapidly developing artificial intelligence technologies to affect traditional company structures have revealed the necessity of conducting an examination on the future of company law. Our study focuses on the use of artificial intelligence technologies in company management and its legal consequences, and the subject is examined under four main sections. In the introduction, the subject, importance, purpose, scope and systematics of the study are briefly explained, and the conceptual framework of artificial intelligence and company management is given. In the first part, the interaction of corporate law and artificial intelligence technologies is examined. In this section, the interaction of artificial intelligence technologies with commercial law and company law is examined, the effects of digitalization on corporate law are discussed, especially within the framework of the transformation in company structures and conflicts of interest. In the second part, the use of artificial intelligence technologies in company management is examined as a process. In this section, where the acquisition of artificial intelligence technologies suitable for the company and the methods of using these technologies in company management are investigated, starting from the decision to use, all technical, legal and commercial expectations and uncertainties are investigated. The third chapter focuses on the legal consequences of the use of artificial intelligence technologies in company management and how the law will be affected by this transformation. In the last part, there is an interactive section that includes a decision tree design with thoughts on the future of management.

Ticari hayatın gerekleri, ticari işletmelerin faaliyetlerini devam ettiren bir organizasyon bütünü olarak devredilebilmesi ihtiyacını doğurmaktadır. Tüzel kişilik tanınmamış ve hukuk süjesi sayılmamış olan ticari işletmeyi ilgilendiren malvarlığının, hukuki işlemlere konu olması ve özellikle devri bakımından özel bir hukuki rejim öngörülmüştür. Bunun için, Türk Ticaret Kanunu'nun 11/3 fıkrasında düzenlenen şekil ve koşullara uyularak, ticari işletmenin devri gerçekleştirilebilir. 1 Temmuz 2012 tarihinde yürürlüğe giren 6102 sayılı Türk Ticaret Kanunu 11. maddesi ile ticari işletmenin devri sözleşmesinin ve de ticari işletmeyi bir tütün halinde konu alan diğer sözleşmelerin yazılı olarak yapılacağı belirtilerek yazılı şekil şartı ilk kez hukukumuza getirilmiştir. Bununla birlikte, yeni Ticaret Kanunumuz, ticari işletmenin devri prosedürünü kolaylaştırmak adına tescilsiz kazanım öngörmekte ve de aktif unsurların devri için genel hükümlerin gerektirdiği kurucu işlemlerin yapılmasına gerek olmadan devrin gerçekleşeceğini düzenlemektedir. Bu düzenlemenin sicile güven ilkesi açısından neticeleri ve doğura bileceği hukuki sakıncalar tezimizde incelenmiştir. The requirements of commercial life may create the need to transfer the commercial enterprises as a whole organization that continues its activities. A special legal regime has been foreseen for assets of business, which is not recognised as a legal entity, to be subject to transactions, particularly to assignment. For this purpose, the transfer of a commercial enterprise is to be carried out in compliance with the forms and conditions set out in article 11/3 of the Turkish Commercial Code. The written form condition for the transfer of the commercial enterprise agreements and the other agreements in relation to the commercial enterprise has firstly regulated under the Article 11 of the Turkish Commercial Code numbered 6102, has entered in to ferce on July 1, 2012. In addition to this, in order to facilitate the transfer of the commercial enterprise procedure, New Commercial Code stipulates the acquisition without registration officially and transfers of the assets without performing the transaction required by the general provision. The results and legal inconveniency of the said regulation with respect to the believe in registration principle will be discussed in our thesis.

Les membres du conseil d'administration, qui sont l'organe représentatif et exécutif de la société anonyme, sont investis de pouvoirs et d'attributions étendus à tous les stades de leur activité (Code de Commerce turc art. 365, art. 374). En cas de perte résultant de la violation de ces obligations, il est inévitable que la responsabilité soit mise en avant. Ceci est principalement une conséquence naturelle de la règle générale de "l'équilibre autorité-responsabilité". Dans ce contexte, l'existence et l'effectivité des actions en responsabilité ont un rôle dissuasif pour que les administrateurs ne manquent pas à leurs obligations. D'autre part, en raison du principe de la responsabilité limitée avec les actifs contre les créanciers de la société anonyme (Code de Commerce turc art. 329/1), la protection des actifs est importante pour empêcher les créanciers de subir des pertes. De plus, la question de la responsabilité revêt une importance particulière au regard des principes de gouvernance d'entreprise. Parce que la comptabilité et la responsabilité sont les éléments clés du principe de gouvernance d'entreprise dans les sociétés anonymes qui sont les acteurs les plus importants de la vie économique d'aujourd'hui. Par conséquent, des réglementations détaillées prises en vertu du Code de Commerce turc concernant les obligations et les responsabilités des membres du conseil d'administration; en outre, les dispositions relatives aux poursuites en responsabilité ont été réglementées de manière plus détaillée et systématique et des changements importants ont également été introduits à cet égard. Dans ce cadre, un régime de responsabilité spéciale a été institué pour les administrateurs en dehors des dispositions de responsabilité générale, tandis que les articles 549 à 552 du Code de Commerce turc réglementent la responsabilité spéciale, l'article 553 et les articles suivants du Code de Commerce turc réglementent les dispositions relatives à la responsabilité générale. Ces articles sont relativement larges et complets par rapport à l'ancien code. Diverses études monographiques ont été réalisées en matière de responsabilité juridique des membres du conseil d'administration et ce sujet a été largement examiné dans les travaux sur le droit des sociétés anonymes. Cependant, l'aspect droit matériel de la responsabilité juridique a été principalement examiné dans la doctrine mais les questions liées aux actions en responsabilité et l'aspect procédurale de l'action ont trouvé une place limitée dans la doctrine. Les expressions similaires sont souvent utilisées concernant la nature du droit d'action des actionnaires et créanciers, mais l'aspect procédurale n'est généralement pas examiné avec une explication détaillée, des analyses et une caractérisation. Cependant, cette question est étroitement liée à des questions importantes telles que la relation entre les demandeurs, la litispendance, le jugement définitif, l'exécution du jugement et les caractéristiques des défenses. Dans notre étude, en raison de l'importance des actions en responsabilité et de l'augmentation du nombre des actions en pratique, nous essayons d'expliquer les caractéristiques de l'action en responsabilité (l'aspect procédural) ainsi que l'aspect du droit matériel. Cependant, notre étude n'est pas une thèse de procédure civile, c'est une thèse de droit matériel et il vise à examiner les questions liées au droit procédural en commençant par la nature de la responsabilité, l'engagement de l'action jusqu'à l'exécution du jugement définitif rendu. En conséquence, le sujet de notre étude est de décrire l'aspect de droit substantiel de l'action en responsabilité et d'examiner les domaines où la responsabilité des membres du conseil d'administration intersecter avec le droit procédural. Donc l'objectif de cette étude est l'aspect de droit substantiel de la responsabilité. Les problèmes procéduraux sont examinés dans cette perspective. La responsabilité civile des membres du conseil d'administration a été examiné conformément à l'article 553 et les dispositions suivantes. L'analyse a été faite pour les personnes qui ont le droit d'action avant la déclaration de faillite, mais pas pour les autres qui ont le droit d'action après la déclaration de faillite (administration de la faillite, créanciers). La responsabilité des membres du conseil d'administration et des dirigeants a été prise en considération. Par ailleurs, la responsabilité résultant de la fondation, les cas particuliers de responsabilité régis par l'article 549 et suivants du Code de Commerce turc, la responsabilité de contrôleur qui est régie par l'article 554 du Code de Commerce turc, l'action particulière en responsabilité régie par l'article 193 du Code de Commerce turc, l'action en responsabilité à l'égard d'un groupe de sociétés régi par l'article 202 et les dispositions suivantes du Code de Commerce turc et la révocation des personnes responsables entre elles selon leurs relations internes (action en révocation) sont exclues du champ de cette étude. Notre étude, préparée dans ce contexte, se compose de cinq grandes parties, dans la première partie, les principes de l'aspect droit matériel de l'action en responsabilité ont été examinés. Dans ce cadre, les réglementations légales antérieures et nouvelles en matière de responsabilité, les innovations apportées par la Code de Commerce turc, la base juridique (la source), le but, l'objet, l'intérêt qu'elle protège, ses éléments, sa relation avec divers actions et institutions et ses caractéristiques sont important. La source de responsabilité est basée sur la relation contractuelle entre les membres du conseil d'administration et la société, et les éléments de responsabilité sont l'illégalité, le dommage, le lien de causalité et la faute. La responsabilité des membres du conseil d'administration appartient à l'organe de gestion, est personnelle et fondée sur la faute. Sur cette note, la présomption de responsabilité a été révoquée et le fardeau de la preuve repose sur le demandeur. Alors que le principe de solidarité différenciée a été inclus dans l'article 557 du Code de Commerce turc, il a été mis l'accent sur l'application des dispositions de relation de causalité ainsi que les articles 51-52 du Code des Obligations turc. En ce qui concerne le devoir de diligence, la méthode de référence indirecte au devoir de diligence de l'employé qui était régie par l'article 320 du précédent Code de Commerce a été abandonnée par l'article 369 du Code de Commerce turc, et le devoir de diligence a acquis l'objectivité par l'adoption de « business judgement rule (agir avec diligence, bonne foi et loyauté en decision de gestion)». En outre, dans l'exposé des motifs de l'article, il a été clairement indiqué que le critère de prudence sont pertinents avec la « business judgement rule» Le devoir de diligence est lié à des éléments d'« illégalité » et de « faute ». Par conséquent, cet article signifie l'objectivation de la faute. De ce fait, la frontière entre les éléments d'illégalité et de faute est devenue encore plus incertaine. La délégation de gestion (art.367 du Code de Commerce turc) est une situation qui a un impact sur la responsabilité, avec une délégation valable il y aurait partage responsabilité primaire - responsabilité de surveillance (art. 553/2 du Code de Commerce turc). La nouvelle règle, régie par l'article 557/2 du Code de Commerce turc qui prévoit qu'une action en justice peut être intentée pour l'ensemble du dommage et qu'il peut être demandé au juge de déterminer l'indemnisation de chaque défendeur dans une même action en justice, est importante pour fixer qu'il n'est pas nécessaire que le demandeur tienne compte du principe de solidarité différenciée, et que ce principe est une règle qui ne s'adresse qu'au juge et à la décision qu'il établira. Dans la deuxième partie, les caractéristiques du droit d'intenter une action en responsabilité, les parties de l'action et les modalités d'exercice du droit d'action sont discutées. La caractéristique du droit d'action qui pourrait être exercé par d'autres personnes que la société est importante. Le résultat est étroitement liée aux questions critiques telles que les défenses qui pourraient être invoquées par les défendeurs, et avec quelles défenses pourraient être invoquées contre quel demandeur, la relation entre les demandeurs, la litispendance, le jugement définitif, l'exécution du jugement. Après une évaluation détaillée, notre opinion est que les actionnaires et les créanciers ont chacun individuellement un droit substantiel d'engager une action en responsabilité. En outre, la manière d'exercer le droit de la demande réglementé par la loi est également importante. Étant donné qu'il n'y a pas de disposition ou de déclaration restrictive dans la loi concernant la manière de demande du dommage de l'entreprise, il est également possible d'appliquer tous les recours disponibles en vertu du droit de la procédure civile, de l'exécution et de la faillite. Il est possible de demander des mesures provisoires. Bien qu'il existe une réglementation générale quant aux parties à l'action en responsabilité dans la loi, il est important d'examiner ce sujet. A cet égard, l'action intentée par l'actionnaire avant la faillite n'est soumise à aucune condition. Le montant (ratio) de l'action (la part) n'est pas important. En ce qui concerne le défendeur, les défendeurs sont comptés dans la loi. A ce propos, il est important de déterminer qui entrera dans le champ d'application du concept de « dirigeants», qui est réglementé pour être responsable aux côtés des membres du conseil d'administration. La position des personnes qui ont le droit d'action peut varier selon les avis sur la caractéristique du droit d'action. A notre avis, il n'y a pas d'obstacle légal au dépôt d'actions en responsabilité distinctes par des personnes ayant droit d'action, et cette situation ne constitue pas une litispendance. Dans la troisième partie de notre étude, les instruments de défense relatifs aux actions en responsabilité et à la question de la preuve sont abordés. Les moyens de défense sont importants en ce qui concerne l'instance pendante, la détermination de l'existence des éléments de responsabilité et le calcul du montant de l'indemnité. Parmi les conditions d'action, en tant que moyens de défense en matière de droit procédural, la décision de l'assemblée générale et l'intérêt à agir revêtent une importance particulière. À notre avis la décision de l'assemblée générale devait être recherchée comme condition d'action. En outre, bien que l'intérêt à agir soit une condition générale d'action, il prend plus d'importance pour le cette étude, car dans les actions en responsabilité l'événement qui constitue une violation de l'interdiction de l'abus de droit (art. 2 Code Civil turc). En outre, l'adoption du principe de solidarité différenciée a accru l'importance des motifs de défense individuels. Les motifs matériels de la défense peuvent être très divers, tels que le fait de ne pas être investi d'un organe de gestion, la libération, la prescription, la forclusion, l'exécution du devoir de diligence et la délégation de pouvoir. De plus, comme dans tous les procès, la question de la preuve est également très importante dans les actions en responsabilité. Cependant, un système de preuve spécial et une méthode de preuve n'ont pas été prévus en termes des actions en responsabilité. Par conséquent, des questions telles que la charge de la preuve, l'objet de la preuve, l'échelle de la preuve et les preuves propres doivent être déterminées en tenant compte des caractéristiques spécifiques de l'action en responsabilité, et cela a été examiné dans ce cadre dans notre étude. Dans le quatrième chapitre, le déroulement du procès, le jugement et l'exécution du jugement sont expliqués. En particulier, l'accent mis sur le lien de causalité et l'acceptation du principe de solidarité différenciée avec de nouvelles dispositions obligent le juge à procéder à un examen précis. Dans ce contexte, des questions telles que l'impossibilité du contrôle d'opportunité, la mise en œuvre du principe de solidarité différenciée et la prise en compte de la situation des responsables, qui ne sont pas parties au procès, sont les aspects originaux de la procédure. L'effet du jugement à la fin de l'action est également un sujet discuté dans la doctrine. À notre avis, le jugement ne constituera pas res iudicata (l'autorité de la chose jugée) pour les autres actions en responsabilité et les actions en révocation. Cependant, il convient de noter que l'effet de l'intervention en cas de dénonciation d'instance et d'intervention accessoire, pourrait être important en termes d'action en révocation, et de fait, il peut avoir un effet plus important que res iudicata. Une autre question importante est celle de savoir qui a le pouvoir d'exécuter le jugement et les possibilités dans cette question. Le point le plus prénant ici est que le droit de réclamation de l'actionnaire (le demandeur) comprend le pouvoir d'exécuter le jugement, mais le paiement perçu au stade de l'exécution doit être versée à la société. Dans le cinquième chapitre, quelques situations particulières liées aux actions en responsabilité sont examinées. Dans ce contexte, il a été analysé que l'effet du recouvrement partiel ou total du dommage sur les autres parties responsables dans le cadre de diverses possibilités, la transaction et le désistement d'action (la validité et caractère obligatoire), l'examen de la libération d'une ou plusieurs des personnes responsables au sens de l'article 166/3 du Code des obligations turc, la pertinence de la révocation dans le cadre de l'action en responsabilité et les opérations collusoires de l'entreprise dans le cadre de l'action en responsabilité. Notre avis a été indiqué en conjonction avec l'analyse des arguments de la doctrine et de la pratique sur ces questions.

This subject matter of this work is the prohibition of competition with the company of members of board of directors in joint stock companies under art. 396 of the Turkish Commercial Code. The prohibition of competition is a limitation on the commercial activities and the freedom of competition of a restricted party who has access to information, means or resources due to the legal relationship between parties which grant the restricted party a leverage in competition with the other. The core idea underlying the prohibition of competition is the necessity to protect the party benefiting from this prohibition against competitive activities of the restricted party. The prohibition of competition bans the restricted party from establishing competition with the party benefiting from the prohibition through competitive actions, ultimately from becoming the competitor of the beneficiary. The said competition relationship will occur in the event the services or products serving the same or similar needs are provided to the entirety or part of the same customers or customer group. Board members in joint stock company, having the prevailing right of access to all information and resources of the company leads to the risk that it may use this power for its own or other parties' benefit instead of that of the company. Hence, the prohibition of competition on board members regulated under article 396 of the Turkish Commercial Code is one of the concrete examples of the duty of loyalty of a board member towards the company aiming to prevent such usages prioritizing the benefit of the member or of a third person over that of the company. The focal point of this work is the determination of the scope of application and conditions of this prohibition as a whole. The first chapter of this thesis aims to convey the conceptual basis of the prohibition of competition. In this scope, we first assessed the economic and legal basis of competition. Economic competition is the race/competition of two or more market actors in a specific market in order to engage in a transaction with its counterparty in the market through offering better prices, conditions, goods or services in order to be superior from its competitors. However, the intention to supersede its competitors and the efforts for this purpose may result in the misuse of the right to compete or in an act limiting or eliminating the competitive environment. The Republic of Turkey provides for a constitutional protection over a person's right to engage in commercial activities and, although not expressly regulated, right to compete. However, as is the case for all rights and liberties, the right and liberty to compete cannot be exercised without any limitation. Second, the scope of the prohibition of competition is assessed. In this regard, we tried to determine the elements of the prohibition of competition, its definition, and its legal categorization. Moreover, a comparison of the prohibition of competition with the provisions governing unjust competition aiming to establish honest and undisrupted competition as well as with the rules of Competition Law aiming to prevent disruption of competition through restrictive actions is provided in order to specify the prominent characteristics of the prohibition of competition. Third, the attributes of the provisions governing the prohibition of competition are assessed. Provisions governing prohibition of competition which do not relate to the public order but to the internal relations of parties, and which serve the personal benefit of the beneficiary, are not of a peremptory nature. The prohibition of competition, which materially limits the liberty of engaging in commercial activities protected under the constitutional law, is of an exceptional nature and hence the provisions governing the prohibition of competition need to be construed in a limited manner. Fourth, the prohibition of competition can be regulated in the letter of a contract through mutual agreement thereon by its parties, or the legislator occasionally provides for a legal provision governing the prohibition of competition by attributing a special importance to this prohibition with respect to a specific relationship between the parties. Last, in this first chapter, we identify the reflections of this prohibition of competition within the scope of the Law of Obligations, and the Law of Corporations. The second chapter of this work takes into consideration the reasons of regulating a prohibition of competition on board members, and its scope of application regarding the persons concerned. In this context we first broadly assessed the position of the board of directors, board members and affiliated commercial auxiliaries in a company. Then, the legislative provisions respectively of German Law, Swiss Law and Turkish Law governing the board members' prohibition of competition are specified. While in German Law, just as is the case in Turkish law, the prohibition of competition of board members is stipulated in § 88 of the German Stock Corporation Act, the Swiss Law does not regulate this prohibition of competition of board members with a statutory provision, nonetheless, this prohibition is accepted by the scholars. Thereafter, the reason for regulating the prohibition of competition of board members is assessed. In this scope, the duty of loyalty of a board member arises from the legal relationship between the member and the corporation being based on the principle of trust. The member must refrain from conflicting its interests with the interests of the corporation, in other words, from conflict of interests, due to its duty of loyalty. When the member engages in competition with the company, the interests of the company and the board member conflict with each other. The member is in a considerably advantageous position in this conflict compared to the company, due to the information and resources to which it has access thanks to its position within the company. For this reason, the duty of loyalty aiming to prevent the conflict of interest between the company and the member lies at the basis of the board member's prohibition of competition. Lastly, in this chapter, the persons subject to the prohibition of competition pursuant to article 396 of the Turkish Commercial Code are identified. In this respect, the members of the board of directors as well as persons to whom management authorities are delegated fall within the scope of the ratione personae of article 396 of the Turkish Commercial Code. The commercial representatives and commercial proxies of a company are prohibited from competition pursuant to the prohibition of competition regarding commercial auxiliaries pursuant to article 553 of the Turkish Code of Obligations. Whereas a shareholder is not subject to the prohibition of competition with the company; this prohibition may only be regulated by a contract subject to the Law of Obligations. Furthermore, when evaluating the prohibition of competition of shareholders, whether the shareholder has a duty of loyalty to the company has been assessed under German Law, Swiss Law and Turkish Law. The third chapter of this work sets forth the scope of application of the prohibition of competition of board members with respect to its subject matter, place, and time. In order for a board member to violate the prohibition of competition with the company, the member must engage in an activity competing with the company. Pursuant to the first paragraph of article 396 of the Turkish Commercial Code, two types of competitive actions of board members are banned. The first type is the member engaging in an action which is a commercial transaction that falls within the scope of the field of activity of the company, on behalf of itself or a third party. Accordingly, all kinds of acts and actions of the member realized on behalf of itself or third parties which fall within the scope of activity of the corporation would constitute the breach of the prohibition. The scope of this prohibition also encompasses joining the managing body of another corporation. Furthermore, depending on the specifics of a concrete case, the same member being an employee of a competitor corporation under a service contract, or providing consultancy services or extending facilities to a competitor, or benefiting from a job opportunity which belonged to the company may also be construed to be within the scope of the prohibition of competition. The second type is the member being engaged as a partner with unlimited liability in a corporation engaging in the same types of commercial activities. In this regard, if a member becomes a partner of an ordinary partnership or a collective corporation, or a partner with unlimited liability of a commandite corporation, which engages in activities that fall within the scope of activities of the joint stock company, the prohibition will be breached. The prohibition of competition of the board member with the company may be lifted by an authorization granted by the general assembly pursuant to article 396 of the Turkish Commercial Code. This permission to compete to be granted to a board member may be in the form of a prior approval or a later acknowledgement (ratification), in an expressed or implied manner. As a result of the member being permitted to compete, article 396 of the Turkish Commercial Code will no longer apply even if the member engages in activities in competition with the company. The prohibition to compete of the board member lasts for the duration of the board membership. Once the membership ends, the parties must conclude an agreement in order to continue the prohibition of competition. The said agreement regarding the prohibition of competition will be subject to form requirements to be valid. Pursuant to the liberty of contract inherent in the Law of Obligations, the parties may freely execute an agreement regarding the prohibition of competition, provided they comply with the provisions in paragraph 2 of article 23 of the Civil Code or article 26 and first paragraph of article 27 of the Turkish Commercial Code. The prohibition to compete of board members is valid as long as they execute the activities of the company, and within the geography where the clientele of the corporation is located. The fourth and last chapter of this work is devoted to the consequences of breach of the prohibition to compete by a board member. If a member of the board of directors violates this prohibition, the consequence of this breach is regulated in the first paragraph of art. 396 of the Turkish Commercial Code. Accordingly, the joint stock company is granted with certain elective rights. Such that, primarily the company may request compensation from the member in breach of the prohibition of competition. Second, it may be requested that the transaction is deemed concluded on behalf of the joint stock company, third, that the benefits arising from the agreement the member concludes on behalf of third parties belong to the joint stock company. In its request for compensation, the joint stock company must prove the action of the board member violating the prohibition of competition, that the corporation suffered losses from this activity, and the causal link between this activity and the loss of the company. In its request for the transaction to be deemed concluded on its behalf, the company requests for the economic consequences of the transactions the member concluded in violation of the prohibition of competition on its behalf. In its request for the benefits arising from the agreement, the company requests that benefits arising from the agreement the member concluded on behalf of third parties are left to itself. At this point, we materially benefited from the German doctrine and jurisprudence in explaining the claims requesting that a transaction is deemed concluded on behalf of the company and that the benefits from the transactions are left to the company. These rights granted in the first paragraph of article 396 of the Turkish Commercial Code are not cumulative but elective. Pursuant to the second paragraph of article 396 of the Turkish Commercial Code, the authority to chose one of the elective rights granted to the company belongs to the members of the board of directors, excluding the member having violated the prohibition of competition. The third paragraph of article 396 of the Turkish Commercial Code regulates a dual prescription period of three months and one year. These periods are with respect to the exercise by the company of its elective right to make a claim. The first is the period of three months whose commencement will be determined based on the knowledge by other members that an action subject to the prohibition of competition is realized or that a board member joined another corporation. The second period is the period of one year commencing from the realization of the action violating the prohibition to compete. This one-year period is independent from other members' knowledge that the prohibition to compete has been breached. The corporation may raise other claims against the member violating the prohibition of competition which are not stipulated under article 396 of the Turkish Commercial Code. Accordingly, the corporation may request that the member violating the prohibition of competition through joining a competing corporation as a partner with unlimited liability or joining the managing body of a competitive corporation resigns from this corporation or managing body. Further, the company may dismiss the member violating the prohibition of competition from board membership. Again, the company may initiate a lawsuit to cease the ongoing violation of the prohibition of competition by a board member, or a lawsuit of preclusion prior to probable breaches which have not yet occurred. In this chapter, lastly, the fourth paragraph of article 396 of the Turkish Commercial Code is assessed. This paragraph regulates that provisions governing liability of the members of the board of directors are reserved. This is a new provision which was not present in the abrogated Turkish Commercial Code no. 6762, newly introduced under the Turkish Commercial Code. In this context, we tried to determine the purpose and characteristics of this provision and concluded this work.

Klasik anlamdaki şirketten çıkarma düzenlemeleri, "haklı sebep" temeline dayanmaktadır. Bu düzenlemelerin en tipik özelliği, düzenlemiş oldukları çıkarma hakkı ile şirketin feshi kurumu arasında bir bağlantıya yer vermiş olmalarıdır. Bu bağlantı, haklı sebebe dayalı çıkarma düzenlemelerinin hizmet ettiği birincil amacı da ortaya koymaktadır: Şirketin devamlılığını sağlamak suretiyle ortaklar arasındaki menfaatler dengesi korumak. Türk hukukuna 6102 sayılı Türk Ticaret Kanunu ve 6362 sayılı Sermaye Piyasası Kanunu ile kazandırılan "squeeze-out" müessesesi ise daha farklı bir kuramsal temele dayanmaktadır. Bu müessese ile, şirkette genellikle %90-95 arasında nitelikli bir pay ve/veya oy oranına ulaşmış olan hâkim pay sahibine, azınlığın paylarını herhangi bir sebep göstermeden iktisap edip, onu şirketten çıkarma hakkı tanınmıştır. Böylece çıkarmanın ekseni, "haklı sebep" olgusundan "hâkimiyet" olgusuna kaymıştır. Kanun koyucuların bu şekilde bir çıkarma hakkını öngörmelerindeki temel sebep ise kurumsal nitelikte bazı amaçları gerçekleştirmek isteyen hâkim konumdaki pay sahiplerine bir imkân sunmaktır. Tezimizde, klasik anlamdaki çıkarma müesseselerinin dayanmış olduğu kuramsal temelden ayrılan "squeeze-out" kurumunun kuramsal temeli, düzenlemenin hangi amaçlarla öngörüldüğü meseleleri ele alınmakta; bu bağlamda, kurumun karşılaştırmalı hukuktaki ne şekilde düzenlendiği, kurumun ortaya çıkardığı sorunlar ve bu sorunların çözümüne yönelik önerilere yer verilmektedir. The classic rules designed for exclusion of a partner has a simple theoretical basis: A/an justified/objective reason (or in other words "good cause"). The most typical feature of these rules is they build a bridge between the exclusion right and the dissolution of the company. This bridge also shows the the primary purpose served by these rules which is to maintain the balance of interests among the partners by ensuring the continuity of the company. In comparison with the classical rules, the "squeeze-out" rules which have been introduced into Turkish law with the Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 and the Capital Markets Law No. 6362, have a different theoretical basis. The controlling shareholder who has reached a qualified percentage of capital and/or voting rights (usually %90-95), has been granted the right to acquire the minority's shares without asserting any justified reason and exclude him from the company. Thus the idea behind the exclusion has been changed from "good cause" to the "dominance/control". The main reason for designing such an exclusion right is to provide an opportunity to the controlling shareholders trying to achieve institutional objectives in the company. In our thesis, the theoretical basis of the "squeeze-out" rules and the reasons for designing such a new exclusion right will be examined within the framework of other squeeze-out rules in comparative law. Within this context, the most common problems in squeeze-outs and suggestions for solving these problems are analyzed.

Tez çalışmasının amacı, kripto varlıkların ödeme aracı olarak kullanımını dış ticaretin bileşenleri kapsamında değerlendirmek ve kripto varlıkların yurtdışı ödemelerde ve bireysel yatırımlarda kullanılmaları bağlamında, bireylerin tutumlarını etkileyen faktörleri incelemektir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda öncelikli olarak, kripto varlıkların para işlev ve özelliklerine ne ölçüde uyum sağladıkları hususunda tespitlerde bulunulmuştur. Ulusal paralara eşdeğer kılınan stabil fiyatlı kripto varlıkların geleneksel ve modern para işlevlerine uyumlu oldukları yönünde görüş bildirilmiştir. Para özellikleri açısından ele alındığında da "kabul edilebilirlik" ve "sıradanlık" dışındaki para özelliklerine, tüm kripto varlıkların uyum sağladıkları değerlendirilmiştir. Ayrıca kripto varlık birimleri parasal niteliklerine göre tasnif edilerek, değişken fiyatlı, stabil fiyatlı ve finansal ürünlere bağlanan kripto varlıklar olmak üzere, üç kategoriden oluşan bir sınıflandırma geliştirilmiştir. Para işlev ve özellikleri kapsamındaki tespitlerin ardından, önceden belirlenen dış ticaret bileşenlerinin özelinde kripto varlıkların mevcut ve muhtemel kullanım alanları incelenmiştir. Belirlenmiş olan dış ticaret bileşenleri, uluslararası para birimleri, uluslararası bankacılık, uluslararası lojistik, dış ticaret hukuku ve gümrük işlemleridir. Dış ticaret bileşenlerine yönelik değerlendirmelerde kripto varlıkların ödeme aracı olarak kullanımları esas alınmıştır ve değerlendirme sürecinde çalışma kapsamında oluşturulmuş olan kripto varlık sınıflandırmasının kategorileri için de görüşler oluşturulmuştur. Çalışma kapsamında kripto varlıklara yönelik bireysel tutumları irdelemek amacıyla ampirik bir araştırma gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırma kapsamında UTAUT-2 modelini temel alan bir araştırma modeli oluşturulmuş ve yurtdışı ödemelerde kullanım niyeti ile yatırımda bulunma niyeti olmak üzere, iki farklı bağımlı yapıyı etkileyen unsurlar irdelenmiştir. Yol katsayısı değerine (β) göre yurtdışı ödemelerde kullanım niyetini anlamlı ölçüde etkileyen yapıların önem sırasına göre, "performans beklentisi", "sosyal etki" ve "algılanan risk" adlı boyutlar olduğu bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır. Yatırımda bulunma niyetini anlamlı düzeyde etkileyen bileşenler ise sırasıyla; "performans beklentisi", "sosyal etki", "farkındalık" ve "algılanan risktir". Araştırma kapsamında bağımlı ve bağımsız yapılar arasındaki etkileşimi incelemek amacıyla etki büyüklüğü (f²) ve tahmin gücü (q²) değerleri de hesaplanmıştır. Yol katsayısı değerlerine göre modelin bağımlı yapılarını anlamlı düzeyde ve negatif yönde etkileyen "algılanan risk" boyutunun, f² değeri açısından anlamlı bir katkısının olmadığı görülmüştür. Ayrıca yol katsayılarına göre "performans beklentisi" bağımlı yapılar üzerinde en çok etkiye sahipken, etki büyüklüğüne göre en önemli yapı "sosyal etkidir". Bağımsız yapıların tahmin gücü (q²) değerleri de etki büyüklüğü (f²) değerleri ile paralel sonuçlar ortaya koymuştur. Ortaya koyulan ampirik araştırmanın sonucunda, örneklemin yurtdışı ödemelerde ve yatırım kararlarında kripto varlıkları kullanma eğilimleri açısından en önemli etmenlerin "performans beklentisi" ve "sosyal etki" olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. The aim of the thesis study is to evaluate the use of crypto assets as a payment instrument within the scope of the components of foreign trade and to examine the factors affecting the attitudes of individuals in the context of the use of crypto assets in foreign payments and individual investments. For this purpose, first, it was evaluated that to what extent crypto assets are compatible with money functions and features. It was stated that stable priced crypto assets, which are equivalent to national currencies, are compatible with traditional and modern money functions. When considered in terms of money features, it was evaluated that all crypto assets are compatible with money features other than "acceptability" and "ordinariness". In addition, crypto assets were classified according to their monetary characteristics, and a classification was developed consisting of three categories: variable priced, stable priced and crypto assets linked to financial products. After the evaluations within the scope of money functions and features, the current and possible usage areas of crypto assets were examined specifically for the previously determined foreign trade components. The determined foreign trade components are international currencies, international banking, international logistics, foreign trade law and customs procedures. Evaluations for foreign trade components were based on the use of crypto assets as a payment instrument and arguments were formed for the categories of the crypto asset classification created within the scope of the study during the evaluation process. Within the scope of the study, an empirical research was carried out to examine individual attitudes towards crypto assets. A research model based on the UTAUT-2 model was formed and the factors affecting two different dependent structures, namely "intention to use in foreign payments" and "intention to invest", were examined. According to the value of the path coefficient (β), it was found that the structures that significantly affect the intention to use in foreign payments are the dimensions called "performance expectancy", "social impact" and "perceived risk", in order of importance. The components that significantly affect the intention to invest are "performance expectancy", "social impact", "awareness", and "perceived risk", respectively. Effect size (f²) and predictive relevance (q²) values were also calculated to examine the interaction between dependent and independent structures within the scope of the research. It was seen that the "perceived risk" dimension, which affects the dependent structures of the model significantly and negatively according to the path coefficient values, does not have a significant contribution in terms of f² value. In addition, according to the path coefficients, "performance expectancy" has the largest impact on the dependent structures, while the most important structure according to the effect size is "social impact". The predictive relevance (q²) values of the independent structures also showed similar results with the effect size (f²) values. As a result of the empirical research, it was concluded that the most significant factors in terms of the tendency of the participants to use crypto assets in foreign payments and investment decisions are "performance expectancy " and "social impact".

Ekonomilerin küreselleşmesi ve piyasaların globalleşmesi karşısında, ortak bir dile sahip olma arzusu giderek daha fazla hissedilmektedir. Bu ihtiyacı hafifletmek için dünya çapında, birçok ülke, kalite ve karşılaştırılabilir bilgiler için UFRS standartlarını benimsemenin uygun olduğunu düşünmüştür. Bu momentumda, SYSCOHADA muhasebe sistemi aracılığıyla OHADA alanı, 2017 yılında standartlarını UFRS ile uyumlu hale getirmeye karar vermiştir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Uluslararası Muhasebe Standartlarını (UMS/UFRS), on yedi ülkedeki tüm varlıklarının muhasebesini yöneten Afrika'da Ekonomi Hukuku'nun Uyumlaştırılması Örgütü'nün muhasebe sistemi (SYSCOHADA) ile karşılaştırmaktır. Bu karşılaştırmalı analizin amacı, yukarıdaki iki muhasebe sisteminin benzerliklerini ve farklılıklarını ortaya koymaktır. Bu analiz UMS 1 : Finansal Tabloların Sunuluşu, UMS 2: Stoklar, UMS 7: Nakit Akış Tablosu, UMS 8: Muhasebe Politikaları, Muhasebe Tahminlerinde Değişiklikler Ve Hatalar, UMS 10: Raporlama Döneminden Sonraki Olaylar, UMS 12 :Gelir Vergileri, UMS 16 :Maddi Duran Varlıklar, UMS 19 :Çalışanlara Sağlanan Faydalar, UMS 20 :Devlet Teşviklerinin Muhasebeleştirilmesi Ve Devlet Yardımlarının Açıklaması, UMS 21 :Kur Değişiminin Etkileri, UMS 23 Borçlanma Maliyetleri, UMS 37 Karşılıklar, Koşullu Borçlar ve Koşullu Varlıklar, UMS 38 Maddi Olmayan Duran Varlıklar açısından yapılan muamelelere odaklanacaktır. Çalışma, her iki muhasebe standardı hakkında da iyi bir anlayışa sahip olmayı sağlayacaktır. Bu nedenle, yatırımcılar ve diğer tüm kişiler, SYSCOHADA ve Uluslararası Muhasebe Standartları ile ilgilenenler, bu iki muhasebe standardının finansal tablolarının karşılaştırılabilirliğini kolaylaştırmak amacıyla muhasebe düzenlemeleri hakkında iyi bir anlayışa sahip olabileceklerdir. Çalışma sonucunda SYSCOHADA ile Uluslararası Muhasebe Standartları arasındaki karşılaştırma birçok benzerlik ve çok az farklılık ortaya koymaktadır. Kıta Avrupası muhasebe sistemi ve Anglo-Sakson sisteminden kaynaklanan SYSOHADA hükümleri, kaynaklarını Uluslararası Muhasebe Standartlarında bulmaktadır. Ancak, bu iki standarttaki en büyük fark, SYSCOHADA için tarihsel maliyet ölçüm yöntemi ile UFRS için gerçeğe uygun değer arasındadır. In the face of the globalization of economies and the globalization of markets, the desire to have a common language is increasingly felt. To alleviate this need, many countries around the world have considered it appropriate to adopt IFRS standards for quality and comparable information. At this momentum, the OHADA field, through the SYSCOHADA accounting system, has decided to harmonize its standards with IFRS in 2017. The purpose of this study is to compare the International Accounting Standards (IAS/IFRS) with the accounting system of the Organization for the Harmonization of Economic Law in Africa (SYSCOHADA), which manages the accounting of all its assets in seventeen countries. The purpose of this comparative analysis is to reveal the similarities and differences of the above two accounting systems. This analysis will focus on the treatment of IAS 1 : presentation of financial statements IAS 2: Inventories IAS 7-cash flows IAS 8 accounting policies, changes in accounting estimates and errors IAS 10: events after the reporting period IAS 12 income taxes IAS 16 :property, plant and equipment assets IAS 19 :employee benefits IAS 20 :accounting for government grants and government assistance, description of TMS 21 :the effects of changes in foreign exchange rates IAS 23 borrowing costs, IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets, IAS 38 intangible assets . The study will allow to have a good understanding on both accounting standards. Therefore, investors and all others persons interested in the SYSCOHADA and International Accounting Standards will be able to have a good understanding on the accounting regulations in order to facilitate the comparability of the financial statements of these two accounting standards. As a result of the study, the comparison between the SYSCOHADA and international accounting standards reveals many similarities and few differences. Originating from the continental European accounting system and the Anglo-Saxon system, the provisions of the SYSOHADA find their sources in International Accounting Standards. However, the major difference in these two standards is between the historical cost measurement method for the SYSCOHADA and the fair value for IFRS.

Kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk her ne kadar son yıllarda Türk iş dünyasının radarına girmiş olsa da, şirketler hukukunun doğuşundan beri var olan hem bir tartışma konusu hem de bir temennidir. İşbu tez kapsamında, üzerinde uzlaşmaya varılmış bir tanımı bulunmayan kurumsal sosyal sorumluk kavramının, yıllardır bağlayıcı olmayan hukuk enstrümanları ile düzenlenmesinin bir adım ilerisine geçmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Bu adımın da, kavramın şirketler hukuku mevzuatı çerçevesinde bağlayıcı hukuk kuralı hâline getirilmesi ile mümkün olacağı savunulmaktadır. Araştırma metodolojisinde, yürürlükte olan mevzuat hükümleri analizine yoğunlaşılmış olmasının yanı sıra kavramın tarihsel gelişimi gereği bağlayıcı olmayan hukuk (soft law) düzenlemelerine de yer verilmiştir. Şirketlerin pay sahibi dışında; işçiler, alacaklılar, çevre ve toplum gibi diğer menfaat sahiplerinin de çıkarlarını göz önünde bulunduracak şekilde varlığını devam ettirmesinin hâlihazırdaki Türk hukuk mevzuatı ve özellikle de Türk Ticaret Kanunu hükümleri kapsamında mümkün olmadığı görülmektedir. Bu doğrultuda şirketin kâr elde etme amacının yumuşatılması, diğer menfaat sahiplerinin şirket içindeki konumlarının güçlendirilmesi, yönetim kurulu yapısının değiştirilmesi ve yönetim kurulu üyelerinin özen ve bağlılık yükümlülüklerinin kapsamının yeniden düzenlenmesi ile kurumsal sosyal sorumluluğun şirketler hukuku kapsamında temellendirilebileceği öne sürülmektedir. Although corporate social responsibility has entered the radar of Turkish business world in recent years, it is both a topic of discussion and a wish that has existed since the birth of corporate law. Within the scope of this thesis, it is aimed to go one step further than mentioning the concept of corporate social responsibility, which has no agreed definition, in only non-binding legal instruments for years. It is argued that this step will be possible by making the concept a binding legal rule within the framework of company law legislation. In the research methodology, besides focusing on the analysis of the legislation provisions in force, non-binding law (soft law) regulations due to the historical development of the concept are also included. Within the scope of the current Turkish legislation, especially the provisions of the Turkish Commercial Code, it is seen that it is not possible for companies to continue their existence in a way that takes into account the interests of other stakeholders such as workers, creditors, environment and society other than the shareholders. In this direction, it is claimed that corporate social responsibility can be grounded within the scope of company law by, inter alia, softening the company's aim of making profit, strengthening the positions of other stakeholders within the company, changing the structure of the Board of Directors and reorganizing the scope of Board of Directors' duty of care.

Mesafe ve sınırların ortadan kalkmasıyla uluslararası ticarette pozitif yönde ivme kazanılmıştır. Bu yolda uluslararası ekonomik ilişkilerin geliştirilmesi amacıyla yapılan anlaşmalar, kurulan örgütler, sağlanan teşvikler ve kaldırılan ithalat vergileri sayesinde, farklı ülkelerdeki firmalar ve bireyler, birbirleriyle daha hızlı bir şekilde alışverişe girmeye başlamış ve bunun sonucunda ticari faaliyetler ülke sınırlarını aşarak küresel boyutlara ulaşmıştır. Bunun sağlanabilmesi için taşıma sektöründe kullanılan araçlar detaylandırılarak daha güçlü hale getirilmiştir. Böylelikle malların dağıtımı daha ekonomik, güvenli ve hızlı bir şekilde gerçekleştirilmektedir. Bunun sonucu olarak taşıma sözleşmelerinin uluslararası ticaretteki yeri de giderek önem kazanmıştır. Öyle ki hakların ve borçların teminatı için sözleşme kaçınılmaz yoldur. Yakın tarihte, uluslararası alanda ticaretin daha kolay ve hızlı hale getirilmesi için yeknesak bir sistem oluşturulması ihtiyacı ortaya çıkmış ve buna binaen ulusal düzenlememiz olan TTK'nın yanında, uluslararası karayolu taşımacılığında, koşulları standardize eden, taşıyıcının sorumluluklarını belirleyen CMR Konvansiyonu oluşturulmuştur. Düzenlenen kurallar doğrultusunda, taşıyıcı eşyayı teslim aldığı andan teslim edinceye kadar zarardan ve kayıptan sorumlu olacaktır. Taşıyıcı, ancak TTK ve CMR'de yer alan genel ve özel kurtuluş karinelerinin varlığının ispatı halinde sorumluluktan muaf olabilecektir. Aksi halde taşıyıcı, meydana gelen zarar veya zayiatın oranı doğrultusunda sorumlu olacak ve buna müteakiben tazminat miktarı belirlenecektir. TTK ve CMR pek çok noktada benzerlik gösterse de bazı yönleriyle keskin farklılıklar mevcuttur. Uluslararası ticaretin bekası için önem oluşturan bu nokta özellikle sorumluluk hususunda hukuki tartışmaları da beraberinde getirmiştir. With the obstacle of distances and borders disappearing, international trade has gained speed in a positive direction. Thanks to deals and agreements that were made, organisations that were built, incentives that were provided, and removal of import taxes in order to improve economic relations with this respect, companies and people in different countries have started to be able merchandise with each other more quickly; consequently, tradal actions have crossed borders of lands and reached global level. For this to happen, vehicles used in the sector of transportation have been developed, thus made stronger and more elaborate. As a result of this, the distribution of goods can be ensured in a more economic, safer, and faster way, and the role of vehicle contracts in international trade has gradually gained importance as contracts are inevitable to ensure and guarantee rights and debts. In recent history, a need to have a uniform system that would enable international trade to be easier and faster was born, and consequently, in addition to our regulations on TTK (Turkish Commercial Code), CMR Convention which standardized conditions and determined the responsibilities that transporters have in international land transportation. According to the regulations, the transporters are responsible for the safety of the goods in case of a damage and loss) from the moment they take them until they deliver them. The transporters can only be exempt from this responsibility in the case that general and specific presumptions of innocence that a place in the law (TTK) and the CMR can be proven. Otherwise, the transporter shall be responsible for compensating for the damage or the loss that occurred and the cost for the indemnity shall be determined. Although TTK and CMR Convention have similarities in many regards, in some ways they are distinctively different from one another. This point which has a critical role in the future of international trade has brought about many juridical discussions, especially ones related to responsibilities.

İlişkili taraf işlemlerine ilişkin özel düzenlemelerle şirketin varlıklarının ilişkili taraflara aktarılması ve şirketin ve şirketin bütün menfaat sahiplerinin hâkim pay sahipleri ve yöneticiler tarafından sömürülmesinin engellenmesi amaçlanır. Bu amaçla ilişkili taraf işlemleriyle ilgili Sermaye Piyasası Kanunu'nda etraflıca bir düzenleme getirilmiş ve önemli bazı işlemler için prosedür öngörülmüştür. Çalışmamız, esaslı düzenleme Sermaye Piyasası Kanunu'nda yer aldığı için bu düzenleme temel alınarak şekillendirilmiştir. Ancak sadece halka açık şirket değil; halka kapalı şirketler yönünden de konu incelenmiş, ilişkili taraf işlemi sayılabilecek Türk Ticaret Kanunu'nda ve diğer kanunlarda yer alan diğer düzenlemelere de yer verilmiştir. Tez dört bölümden oluşmaktadır. İlk bölümde ilişkili taraf işlemi kavramı genel olarak açıklanmış, ilişkili taraf işlemleriyle ilgili düzenlemelere neden ihtiyaç olduğu hususu ortaya koyulmaya çalışılmıştır. Bu kapsamda benzer kavramlarla karşılaştırılmış ve Avrupa Birliği ve çeşitli ülkelerde düzenlemeler incelenmiştir. Nihai olarak Türk hukukunda ilişkili taraf işlemlerinin tarihsel sürecine yer verilmiştir. İkinci bölümde yasal düzenlemelerdeki ilişkili taraf ve ilişkili taraf işlemi kavramı ele alınmıştır. Üçüncü bölümde ise ilişkili taraf işlemleriyle ilgili Sermaye Piyasası Kanunu, Türk Ticaret Kanunu ve bazı özel kanunlarda yer alan düzenlemeler incelenmiş, ilişkili taraf işlemleri için öngörülen prosedürel korumalar açıklanmıştır. Dördüncü bölümde ise hukuka aykırı ilişkili taraf işlemlerinin sonuçları incelenmiş ve ilgililerin sorumluluğuna yer verilmeye çalışılmıştır. Special regulations regarding related party transactions aim to prevent the transfer of the assets of the joint stock company to the related parties and thus prevent the exploitation of all the stakeholders of the company by the controlling shareholders and managers. For this purpose, a comprehensive regulation has been introduced in the Capital Markets Law regarding related party transactions and a procedure has been envisaged for some significant transactions. Since the main regulation is contained in the Capital Markets Law, our thesis has been shaped based on this regulation. However, this thesis has not examined the subject only for public companies; it has also examined it in terms of non-public companies, and other regulations in the Turkish Commercial Code and other laws, which can be considered as related party transactions. The thesis consists of four parts. In the first part, the concept of related party transactions is explained in general and the reason for the need for regulations regarding related party transactions is tried to be revealed. In this context, related party transactions have been compared with similar concepts and the regulations in the European Union and various countries have been examined. Finally, the historical process of related party transactions in Turkish law is examined. In the second chapter, the concept of related party and related party transactions as defined in legal regulations is discussed. In the third section, the regulations contained in the Capital Markets Law, the Turkish Commercial Code and some special laws related to related party transactions are examined and the procedural protections provided for related party transactions are explained. In the fourth chapter, the results of unlawful related party transactions are examined and the liability of the related parties is tried to be included.

Anonim ortaklıkta her pay sahibi genel kurulda, yönetim kurulundan şirketin işleri; denetçilerden ise denetimin yapılma şekli ve sonuçları hakkında bilgi alma talebinde bulunma hakkına sahiptir. Ayrıca her pay sahibinin şirketin ticari defterlerini ve yazışmalarını, sorusunu ilgilendiren kısımları ile sınırlı olarak inceleyebilme hakkı bulunmakla birlikte, bunun için genel kurulun açık izni veya yönetim kurulunun bu hususta kararı gereklidir. Pay sahibinin bilgi alma ve inceleme hakkının reddi, talep edilen bilginin şirket sırlarının açıklanmasına veya korunması gereken diğer şirket menfaatlerinin tehlikeye girmesine neden olabilecek ise söz konusu olabilir. Bilgi alma ve inceleme talebinin cevapsız bırakılması, haksız olarak reddedilmesi, ertelenmesi veya pay sahibinin kanunda düzenlendiği şekilde bilgi alamaması halinde, hakkın açılacak bir dava ile mahkeme aracılığıyla kullanılması da mümkündür. Çalışmamız dört bölümden oluşmaktadır. İlk bölümde bilgi alma ve inceleme hakkının genel nitelikleri ile karşılaştırmalı hukuktaki düzenlenme şekli; ikinci bölümde hakkı etkileyen ilkeler ve hakkın düzenlenme amacı; üçüncü bölümde bilgi alma ve inceleme hakkının kullanılması ve hakkın sınırları; dördüncü ve son bölümde ise hakkın ihlalinin hukuki sonuçları ele alınmıştır. At the general meeting, any shareholder of a joint stock company is entitled to information from the board of directors on the affairs of the company and from the external auditors on the methods and results of their audit. Also the company ledgers and business correspondence, limited to the parts about the question may be inspected only with the express authorisation of the general meeting or by resolution of the board of directors. It may be refused where providing it would jeopardise the company's trade secrets or other interests warranting protection. If the request for information and examination is left unanswered, unfairly rejected, postponed or if the shareholder is unable to obtain information as regulated in the law, it is also possible to exercise the right through a lawsuit to be filed. Our study consists of four parts. In the first part, the general characteristics of the right to information and examination and the way it is regulated in comparative law; in the second part, the principles affecting the right and the purpose of regulation of the right; the exercise of the right to receive and review information and the limits of the right in the third part; In the fourth and last chapter, the legal consequences of the violation of the right are discussed.