Bibliographie sélective OHADA

2021年7月9日，联合国国际贸易法委员会在其55年的历史中又达到了一个里程碑，通过了《贸易法委员会快速仲裁规则》。快速程序第一次进入公众的视线范围，可以追溯到1992年国际商会仲裁院裁决的潘汉德尔(Panhandle)案。在此之后，快速程序概念逐步被越来越多的仲裁机构接受并纳入仲裁规则，并形成了初步的基本框架。快速仲裁成为贸易法委员会的议题，说明快速仲裁高效率、低成本的特点迎合了当今商事主体对于商事仲裁的最新需求，已逐渐成为商事仲裁的发展趋势。《贸易法委员会快速仲裁规则》在确保尊重当事人意思自治、维护公正的基础之上提高了效率，适当扩大了仲裁机构的管理权。 On 9 July 2021, UNCITRAL reached another milestone in its 55-year history, adopting the UNCITRAL Expedited Arbitration Rules. The expedited procedure first came into the public dating back to the Panhandle decision by the International Chamber of Commerce in 1992. After this, the concept of expedited procedure was gradually accepted and incorporated into the arbitration rules by more and more arbitration institutions. Expedited arbitration becoming the discussing issue of UNCITRAL shows that the characteristics of high efficiency and low cost of expedited arbitration meet the latest needs of users for commercial arbitration today, and has gradually become the development trend of commercial arbitration. The UNCITRAL Expedited Arbitration Rules improves on the basis of respecting the autonomy and maintaining fairness, and appropriately expands the management power of the arbitration institution.

仲裁作为解决国际商事争议的主要方式之一，受到国际工程承包企业的青睐，然而当事人在决定一个案件是否要提起仲裁时，常会把仲裁费用作为一个重要考量指标，高昂的仲裁费用可能会限制国际商事仲裁制度的健康发展。本文以2017版国际商会仲裁规则下的收费标准为基础，从仲裁费用的构成、计算方法入手，探讨了仲裁费用影响因素，并给出了控制仲裁过程费用的合理化建议。 Arbitration, as one of the main ways to resolve international commercial disputes, remains a popular choice for international engineering company. The arbitration fees will be an important evaluating indicator when the parties considering apply for arbitration. Expensive arbitration fees may restrict the healthy development of international commercial arbitration system. Based on the arbitration cost and fees under the arbitration rules of the 2017 edition of the International Chamber of Commerce, characteristics, composition and calculation method of the arbitration fees are showed in this paper firstly; then, its influencing factors are discussed. Reasonable suggestions for controlling the arbitration fees are given in the end of this paper.

根据传统仲裁理论以及国际主流观点，仲裁裁决一经仲裁地法院撤销即已宣告该裁决“死亡”，因而也无法获得执行地国法院的承认和执行。但是随着全球化的纵深发展，衍生出了一系列国际商事仲裁的新理念、新理论和新动态，如意思自治在国际私法领域的扩张及国际商事仲裁裁决理论的更新等，进而导致已被撤销的仲裁裁决重获新生。但是由于该现象依然处于缓慢演进状态且各国国情差异较大，故而在“复活”规则方面缺乏统一的适用标准，致使现行的国际商事仲裁执行秩序的稳定性和一致性受到干扰。针对此问题，本文在分析已被撤销的仲裁裁决“复活”法律依据的基础上，从国际法层面和国内法层面提出相应的完善规则。 According to the traditional arbitration theory and the international mainstream view, once the ar-bitration award is revoked by the court of the place of arbitration, the award is declared “dead” and therefore cannot be recognized and enforced by the court of the country where the arbitration is executed. However, with the deepening development of globalization, a series of new ideas, new theories and new trends of international commercial arbitration have been derived, such as the expansion of autonomy of will in the field of private international law and the update of the arbitra-tion theory of international commercial arbitration, which leads to the rebirth of the arbitration awards that have been cancelled. However, because the phenomenon is still in a slow evolution state and the national conditions of different countries are large, there is a lack of uniform applica-ble standards in the “resurrection” rule, which interferes with the stability and consistency of the current international commercial arbitration execution order. In view of this problem, this paper, based on the analysis of the legal basis of the “resurrection” of the cancelled arbitral award, puts forward the corresponding perfect rules from the international law and domestic law.