Bibliographie sélective OHADA

This is a collection of essays about the restraint of trade doctrine as laid down in the courts of the United Kingdom and the British Commonwealth. Generally, I will not give an account of the restraint of trade doctrine in the United States of America, for even although each individual state (apart from the civil jurisdictions California and Louisiana) and the federation itself, has a common law system, for reasons peculiar to those jurisdictions, the restraint of trade case law there has become so vast and so confused as to be unsuitable for my purposes. More importantly, however, the common law restraint of trade doctrine in the United Kingdom and the British Commonwealth has been laid down by courts without any significant consideration of the state of the law in the United States. Davies v Davies (1887) 36 Ch D 359, 370 by contrast, the period during which the Privy Council operated as a supra national court of final appeal has resulted in considerable harmony in the doctrine within the British Commonwealth. Even now the House of Lords is influential in Australia and Canada and the influence is increasingly reciprocal. By way of an exception I will discuss the purposes of the anti-trust legislation in the United States. This is necessary because I intend to show that the common law restraint of trade doctrine was not able to be, and was never intended to be, a means of regulating the economy in contradistinction to the United States anti-trust legislation and related legislation in the British Commonwealth. This account is not merely a description of the law relating to the restraint of trade doctrine although I do purport to describe the law. There are other accounts of the restraint of trade doctrine which do that well. Accounts of the restraint of trade doctrine include: Matthews & Adler, The Law Relating to Covenants in Restraints of Trade (London, 2nd ed 1907); Sanderson, Restraint of Trade in English law (London, 1926); Heydon, The Restraint of Trade Doctrine (London, 1971); Trebilcock, The Common Law of Restraint of Trade; A Legal and Economic Analysis (Toronto, 1986); Dean, The Law of Trade Secrets (Sydney, 1990); Mehigan & Griffiths, Restraint of Trade and Business Secrets: Law & Practice (London, 2nd ed 1991); Holdsworth, History of English Law IV (3rd ed, 1945) 343-54, 373-9; VIII (2nd ed, 1937) 56-42. There are other, less detailed accounts in contract law textbooks. The purpose of this dissertation is to describe aspects of the doctrine as it developed between the medieval period and the twentieth century and then to use that account as a basis for an analysis of how the law has taken a number of paths during the twentieth century which cannot be justified by the rules and their justifications which existed in the law prior to that time. Such a development has had important consequences for the restraint of trade doctrine and even the law in general, most of which have been detrimental. I do not intend to give a continuous historical narrative covering the whole of the doctrine. The history has been described before. For example, I do not intend to give a discrete account of the process by which the absolute rule against general restraints of trade gave way to the rule of reason, although I do mention this process where relevant for other purposes. The history, so far as it is relevant, is integrated into each chapter. I will argue that historically the restraint of trade doctrine was a rule or complex of rules, of a certain form and content. The form and content of the rule are important because they bear on the meaning of the class term "restraint of trade" which is an element of the rule. The meaning of that term began to change around the year 1890. Beginning first with certain classes of trade combination, courts began to classify as restraints of trade covenants which did not in fact restrain trade. Then the courts similarly treated the exclusive dealing contract and certain forms of property transaction. Another trend in the law which added to the confusion about the meaning of restraint of trade was the failure by the courts to make definitive findings one way or another as to whether a particular covenant was in restraint of trade. The courts were then faced with a dilemma. The law required a court to refuse to enforce a covenant in restraint of trade unless the covenantee could justify the restraint by presenting evidence to the court from which the courts could assess whether or not that particular restraint was within the reason for the restraint of trade doctrine or not. Such considerations were entirely inapt in the case of covenants which, in accordance with the traditional view, did not restrain trade. Yet if the courts did not validate these contracts, catastrophic consequences would have followed for the parties to such contracts and, indeed, to contract as an institution. To solve the dilemma the courts began to interpret the famous statement of the restraint of trade doctrine by Lord Macnaghten in Nordenfelt v Maxim Nordenfelt Guns & Ammunition Co [1894] AC 535, 565 (HL) literally, rather than contextually. Ultimately this has resulted in the obscuring of the rule underlying the restraint of trade doctrine itself. There were many minor confusions along the way. It is important that the doctrine is coherent and its use consistent with its justifications because it is still a fruitful cause of legal change. In the last year the force of the rule has caused a radical restructuring of Association Football in Europe Bosman’s case. The rule has even penetrated the collective consciousness of the community at large. The broad thrust of the development and the detail will be outlined in the next thirteen chapters.

Theorising again about a topic that has already received a great deal of scientific attention may be viewed, to use some well known words of Camus, as "the ultimately absurd act" (Camus, 1975). Precisely in order to avoid, when dealing with a classic topic, falling into the absurd, or what is only slightly better, into the banal, it is necessary to use afresh methodological and conceptual tools. This should allow one to pose new questions and, finally, open up new intellectual perspectives. Conversely, the distance that one is to cover needs to be not too far removed from current paradigms. Otherwise one may fall into a different kind of trap -that of offering a contribution which is interesting but totally useless, as it were, for the purpose of shedding new light on the ongoing debate. In fact the main trigger for embarking on this project was a reaction to what were current legal critiques of the principle of subsidiarity at a given moment. Though I conceded that a critical outlook should be taken as regards subsidiarity, and no mere review of the principle in legal-technical terms, the standard critique left me with the bitter taste of scientific dissatisfaction. In my view it seemed, at best, to entirely miss the point as regards the issues, that were raised by the introduction of subsidiarity into the constitutional order of the Community, which, in turn, implied that the answers that were given were also clearly unsuitable. I therefore underwent the effort of giving an alternative critical reading of the principle of subsidiarity, the result of which constitutes the thrust of this thesis. Yet before entering into the following critique, it is important to make, by way of introduction, a number of remarks concerning (i) the genealogy of this thesis; (ii) the method; (iii) conceptual issues; (iv) the exposition of the main research hypothesis according to which this work shall be conducted; and (v) the structure of this thesis.

Come viene tradizionalmente notato, tra i pilastri di ogni moderno sistema processuale vi è il principio dell'effettività della tutela giurisdizionale, il quale principio richiede che sia garantito all'attore che può avere ragione il conseguimento pratico del bene che gli è riconosciuto dalla legge. Vi è però il pericolo che il tempo necessario allo svolgersi dei processo ordinario faccia giungere troppo tardi il provvedimento definitivo, perché nel frattempo si sono verificate circostanza tali da rendere impossibile (o più gravosa) l'attuazione pratica della sentenza di accoglimento della domanda giudiziale. Si tratta quindi di risolvere quello che è stato definito 'forse il più antico e più difficile problema pratico di ogni legislazione processuale': la necessità che il provvedimento definitivo, 'per essere praticamente efficace, sia emanato senza ritardo e la inettitudine del processo ordinario a creare senza ritardo un provvedimento definitivo'. Occorre in altri termini regolare 'uno di quei casi in cui la necessità di far presto si urta contro la necessità di far bene: affinchè il provvedimento definitivo nasca colle migliori garanzie di giustizia, esso dev’essere preceduto dal regolare e meditato svolgimento di tutta una serie di attività, al compimento delle quali è necessario un periodo, spesso non breve, di attesa; ma questa mora indispensabile al compimento dell'ordinario iter processuale rischia di rendere praticamente inefficace il provvedimento definitivo, il quale pare essere destinato, per amor di perfezione, a giunger troppo tardi, come la medicina lungamente elaborata per un ammalato già morto. Per neutralizzare il rischio di inefficacia pratica della tutela giurisdizionale derivante dalla durata fisiologica del processo ordinario, normalmente i sistemi processuali degli ordinamenti interni prevedono che il giudice possa proteggere medio tempore la posizione giuridica sostanziale dedotta in giudizio, in attesa della decisione finale. Per riferirsi all'insieme dei rimedi, di natura tipica o atipica, cui il giudice ricorre a tale scopo, nella terminologia italiana si ricorre all'espressione "provvedimenti cautelari", che può considerarsi equivalente a quelle correntemente utilizzate in ordinamenti stranieri (me sur es proviso ires, medidas cautelar es, provisionai reme dies, Vorsorgliche Rechtsschutz).

This thesis examines problems related to particular labor laws currently applied in international air transport. This analysis is framed within the context of scholarly theory and judicial practice arising from various regimes of labor law governing industrial injury, the individual contract of employment, labor-management relations, and fair treatment in the civil aviation industry. A critical survey of labor regulations operating in the international air transport industry is provided through commentary on the principles formulated by judicial decisions and the theories which underlie their reasoning, helping to clarify both substantive and procedural labor laws affecting international air transport. A critical analysis of different categories of statutory labor law governing international air transport is also provided to assess the validity of commonly-erected conflict of labor law rules, thereby revealing the inadequacy of the single rule principle in view of the unique and perplexing regulatory interests which are inherent in aviation activity. The divergence between domestic labor statutes and Treaties of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation or bilateral air transport agreements also adds a more subtle aspect to the problems explored.

Obiettivo della tesi è analizzare il significato e l'evoluzione della Politica Comunitaria Preferenziale di Cooperazione allo Sviluppo. Tale lavoro di ricerca non intende essere un 'percorso storico', uno studio cronologico dell'evoluzione delle relazioni preferenziali con gli ACP, dal Trattato di Roma al Trattato di Maastricht. Piuttosto esso si prefigge di analizzare la Politica di Cooperazione allo Sviluppo preferenziale attraverso la sua trasformazione, avvenuta nella pratica comunitaria, da una situazione 'de facto', a una situazione 'de jure'. Ovvero il passaggio da 'relazioni di cooperazione', avviate fin dalle origini del sistema comunitario (Trattato di Roma), ad una reale Politica Comunitaria di Cooperazione con il riconoscimento specifico di una competenza in tale settore in capo alla Comunità (Trattato di Maastricht).

Delineare con precisione i confini di un lavoro di ricerca può non essere cosa agevole, soprattutto se si tratta di una ricerca di natura giuridica e giuslavoristica in particolare. 1 temi che ne costituiscono l’oggetto, non sono mai del tutto astraibili dallo scenario che li circonda, e rischiano quindi, se non debitamente contestualizzati, di essere erroneamente percepiti come oggetti sospesi nel vuoto di una solo apparente compiutezza. L’analisi giuridica della contrattazione collettiva comunitaria - oggetto di questo lavoro - non costituisce in questo senso una eccezione, trattandosi anzi di una materia che soltanto artificiosamente, potrebbe essere interamente esaurita nelle scarne norme positive che ne costituiscono il quadro giuridico di riferimento. Condotta unicamente attraverso lo studio dei riferimenti normativi ad essa propri, una indagine sulla contrattazione collettiva comunitaria risulterebbe non solo e non tanto metodologicamente discutibile, quanto e soprattutto deprivata di una serie di elementi di conoscenza e di valutazione, la cui considerazione si rivela in grado di produrre un rovesciamento degli esiti inizialmente preventivabili. Il lavoro che si presenta costituisce un tentativo di recuperare la “visibilità” di tutti i molteplici fattori - giuridici, istituzionali, politici e sindacali - che, convergendo sul medesimo spazio concettuale occupato dalla contrattazione comunitaria, contribuiscono a definirne e a qualificarne i contorni. La trattazione costituisce di conseguenza il risultato di uno sforzo ricostruttivo scandito dalla continua tensione tra le esigenze di una indagine analitica e le necessità di una valutazione sintetica; tra una fecalizzazione che rischia di nascondere il contesto e una visione d’insieme nella quale la nitidezza delle linee rischia di scomparire; tra i condizionamenti inerziali di una formazione giuslavoristica attenta alla dimensione ordinamentale delle relazioni industriali, e la necessaria considerazione delle complesse trame istituzionali che, in un ordinamento “plurale” come quello comunitario, condizionano qualsiasi forma di regolazione giuridica; insomma tra lo specifico oggetto della ricerca e il complessivo scenario nel quale esso si colloca.

One of the most immediate questions that could be raised is that of the topic. Why banks?. Banks are a part of the economy which is especially prone to regulatory competition. Increasing financial globalization makes it difficult to maintain regulatory barriers and those remaining create costs that are avoided by regulatory arbitrage. Banks’ raw material is capital which is a highly mobile element. On the top of that, the longstanding experience of the US in the field, should be of some usefulness. Finally, banks are attractive since the European Union, by means of the Second Banking Directive, has undertaken a decisive step towards liberalisation. Regulatory competition in this field will be able to give us some clues into the direction of services regulation in general, and into the new institutional dimension of the Union. However, banks are only one type of financial actors. Securities and insurance industry are gradually occupying spaces traditionally reserved to banks - namely deposit collection and lending - and conversely, banks are extending their product range to cover securities and insurance activities, and are experiencing a process of disintermediation. Hence, it is increasingly impossible to distinguish among financial actors. Concentrating in one of them is just a research need in order to keep the study under manageable dimension. Still, banks remain a legally different industry because of their position in the economic gear and in the payment system. What could actually be questioned is the future of banks themselves or at least their different legal treatment In any case, the topic of financial services regulation is too large to be covered as a whole, so some subdivision is necessary. This has to be done acknowledging that divisions may not correspond to the reality of the marketplace.

La Tesis Doctoral tiene por objeto trazar el aspecto de conjunto del fenómeno de la tarjeta de crédito. Tras la delimitación de la figura, realizada a partir de la consideración de sus orígenes y evolución, y luego de tratar del marco jurídico (Derecho Positivo Español, actuaciones de la Comunidad Europea, trabajos de la comisión de las Naciones Unidas para el Derecho Mercantil internacional), se estudian sus caracteres documentales: Idoneidad Legitimadora e Intransmisibilidad. Asimismo se presta atención a las posiciones jurídicas documentalmente representadas por la tarjeta de crédito y a los procedimientos de utilización, distinguiendo entre sus modalidades básicas: las denominadas tarjetas de crédito "bilaterales" y las "trilaterales".

La Tesis Doctoral tiene por objeto trazar el aspecto de conjunto del fenómeno de la tarjeta de crédito. Tras la delimitación de la figura, realizada a partir de la consideración de sus orígenes y evolución, y luego de tratar del marco jurídico (Derecho Positivo Español, actuaciones de la Comunidad Europea, trabajos de la comisión de las Naciones Unidas para el Derecho Mercantil internacional), se estudian sus caracteres documentales:Idoneidad Legitimadora e Intransmisibilidad. Asimismo se presta atención a las posiciones jurídicas documentalmente representadas por la tarjeta de crédito y a los procedimientos de utilización, distinguiendo entre sus modalidades básicas: las denominadas tarjetas de crédito "bilaterales" y las "trilaterales".

La Tesis Doctoral tiene por objeto trazar el aspecto de conjunto del fenómeno de la tarjeta de crédito. Tras la delimitación de la figura, realizada a partir de la consideración de sus orígenes y evolución, y luego de tratar del marco jurídico (Derecho Positivo Español, actuaciones de la Comunidad Europea, trabajos de la comisión de las Naciones Unidas para el Derecho Mercantil internacional), se estudian sus caracteres documentales:Idoneidad Legitimadora e Intransmisibilidad. Asimismo se presta atención a las posiciones jurídicas documentalmente representadas por la tarjeta de crédito y a los procedimientos de utilización, distinguiendo entre sus modalidades básicas: las denominadas tarjetas de crédito "bilaterales" y las "trilaterales".

I examine two potential instances of rent-seeking in financial markets in the 1980s. In the first essay I test whether managers engage in political activity designed to influence federal regulation of the market for corporate control. In the second, I examine whether firms in the financial services sector attempt to affect bank deregulation. Using Federal Election Commission data, I find campaign contributions by corporate political action committees (PACs) are negatively related to levels of inside ownership, my main proxy for managerial vulnerability to hostile tender offers. Contribution patterns for firms with less than 20% insider ownership are relatively highly correlated, and differ from those of firms with greater than 20% inside ownership. Low inside ownership firms have slightly higher levels of contributions to legislators on particular House and Senate committees proposing relevant legislation. However, when I analyze the impact of contributions on legislator support for regulation I find no statistical support for a theory of vote-buying. I conclude that corporate political behavior is tied to levels of inside ownership, and comprises an alternate index of manager-shareholder conflict. Using a similar approach to analyse the financial services industry, I also find significant patterns in political action committee (PAC) campaign contributions for depository (commercial bank and thrift) and non-depository (brokerage and insurance) sectors of the financial services industry during the 98th Congress (1983-84). Contributions by depository firm PACs appear not only to purchase access to legislators serving on important banking committees crucial to their interests, but are also a significant determinant of votes for repealing sections of the Glass-Steagall Act. Nondepository contributions do not appear to influence votes directly, even though the brokerage and insurance sectors effectively lobbied House Banking Committee chairman Fernand St Germain to enforce the regulatory status quo. When I measure the rents at stake in the legislation using a two-factor market model event study approach, I find that the passage of legislation in the Senate had a positive affect on depository firm returns, implying the sector's lobbying effort was justified. However non-depository PACs lobbied just as extensively, and did not experience significant abnormal returns over the same event period, even though this round of deregulation should have been a zero-sum game between the affected sectors of the industry. I then measure the correlation between the market value impacts of new legislation and contribution amounts for individual firms within the sectors. I find rents are correlated with political activity, even for firms in the non-depository sectors.

L'intervention des personnes morales de droit public en faveur des entreprises en difficulté, due à la multiplication des procédures collectives, a été légitimée par la mise en place d'un cadre juridique et de conditions d'intervention. C'est une manifestation du droit économique qui appelle la transgression de la frontière entre le droit public et le droit privé. Celle-ci se manifeste notamment, dans la mise en œuvre de la responsabilité des personnes morales de droit public du fait de leurs interventions, par l'examen des divers fondements juridiques de leur responsabilité. D'autre part, les personnes morales de droit public sont parties à la procédure collective en tant que créancières. Elles ont à ce titre une place particulière mais leurs droits ont été modifies et le droit positif révèle un équilibre entre les intérêts publics et les intérêts privés. Par ailleurs, si les personnes morales de droit public ne peuvent être débitrices dans une procédure collective, certaines situations de fait sont analysées qui conduisent à proposer une procédure de redressement financier à leur égard. Enfin, l'interventionnisme économique de l'Etat et des collectivités locales par l'intermédiaire de sociétés de droit privé génère des difficultés d'application du droit des procédures collectives issues de l'imbrication du droit privé et du droit public et même une inapplicabilité de fait.

Le Sénégal, par la loi n°85-40 du 29 juillet 1985, s'est doté de son premier code des sociétés commerciales depuis son accession à l'indépendance. Cette loi s'inspire des droits français, anglais et américain quant à la direction des sociétés anonymes. C'est à ces droits que sera comparée la direction des sociétés anonymes en droit sénégalais en ses divers aspects que sont les pouvoirs des dirigeants sociaux, leur statut juridique leurs devoirs et leur responsabilité.

La loi du 25 janvier 1985 oriente clairement le droit des procédures collectives vers le sauvetage des entreprises en difficulté. Le législateur s'est donc efforce de réduire les droits des créanciers munis de suretés réelles spéciales, au nombre desquels figurent les créanciers gagistes. Il s'attaque ainsi à l'existence des suretés en favorisant leur annulation ou leur substitution par une autre garantie. Il poursuit en outre l'extinction ou l'amputation systématique des créances garanties. Enfin les créanciers nantis ne peuvent plus exercer librement leur droit de réalisation forcée du gage, encore moins leur droit de préférence, cependant ces atteintes sont compensées par l'éclatement des techniques de réalisation du gage. Celles-ci permettent d'éluder la loi du concours. Mais elles révèlent aussi d'importantes disparités entre les créanciers gagistes.

In hierdie ondersoek is daar navorsing gedoen oor die aard en rol van fisiese beheer in die sakereg met die oog daarop om dit te omskryf en die funksies daarvan te identifiseer. By die verkryging van eiendomsreg word net vereis dat die fisiese beheer wat ten aansien van die saak uitgeoefen word, effektief moet wees. Of 'n saak effektief beheer word al dan nie, word aan die hand van die heersende verkeersopvattings getoets. Hierdie verkeersmaatstawwe wat in die praktyk ten aansien van bepaalde soorte sake uitgekristalliseer het, is buigsaam en veranderlik en dit maak dit moontlik dat die reg by maatskaplike en ekonomiese veranderinge aanpas. Die funksie van fisiese beheer in gevalle van verkryging is altyd publisiteit. In die geval van die beskerming van eiendomsreg word fisiese beheer besonder breed omskryf en daar word slegs verwag dat die persoon van wie die saak teruggeeis word, genoegsame beheer daaroor moet he om dit te kan teruggee. Die funksie van beheer is hier suiwer funksioneel. By die verlies van eiendomsreg speel fisiese beheer nie juis 'n besondere rol nie aangesien die verlies van beheer nie noodwendig op die verlies of beeindiging van eiendomsreg dui nie. Wanneer dit wel ter sprake kom, is die funksie daarvan publisiteit. In die geval van die verkryging van besit en houerskap, dien daarop gelet te word dat die enigste vereiste is dat beheer effektief moet wees en dit word weer eens aan die hand van verkeersmaatstawwe bepaal. Fisiese beheer word strenger omskryf vir verkryging as vir behoud. By die beskerming van besit en houerskap is die enigste vereiste wat gestel word dat beheer vreedsaam en ongestoord moes gewees het. Wanneer beheer oor 'n saak verloor word, gaan dit gewoonlik gepaard met die verlies van besit of houerskap. Die funksie van fisiese beheer is deurgaans publisiteit. Fisiese beheer word redelik streng omskryf vir doeleindes van 'n gewone pand en daar word gewoonlik vereis dat die pandsaak gelewer en gehou moet word vir die vestiging en behoud van 'n pandreg. Die funksies van beheer is hier sekuriteit en publisiteit.

South African company law is currently the object of comprehensive review. One o f the areas under scrutiny is that of corporate governance. Control over management is vital in the interests of the company itself, its shareholders and its creditors. Effective accountability should be balanced against the need to allow those who manage a certain measure of freedom and discretion in the exercise of their function. Company directors are subject to various duties. This thesis concentrates on their fiduciary obligation. It is suggested that this sui generis obligation is owed to the company as a separate entity. Interests of other groups may sometimes merit con­ sideration. Against the background o f a com parative investigation, a "corporate opportunity" is defined as any property or economic opportunity to which the com­ pany has a claim. South African law protects a company’s claim to an opportunity if it is in the company’s line of business and if the company has justifiably been relying upon the director(s) to acquire it or to assist in its acquisition for the company. The application of established fiduciary principles suffice to resolve corporate opportunity matters. Essentially the application o f these rules amount to a determination whether the director has complied with his fundamental duty to act in the company’s best interests. There seems to be no need for a separate doctrine of corporate opportunities.' A director should only be absolved from liability on account of the company’s inability to pursue an opportunity or its rejection by the company if there was no real conflict of interest. The appropriation of corporate opportunities should not be ratifiable, both because the ratification constitutes a fraud on the minority, and because the decision to ratify cannot be regarded as being in the interests of the company. The relationship between the appropriation of corporate opportunities, misuse of confidential information and competition is investigated. These aspects fre­ quently overlap, but should be distinguished because their bases, and accordingly their appropriate remedies, may differ. Effective control may benefit by a restatement of directors’ fiduciary duties in the Companies Act. To this end certain amendments to the Act are recommended.

This dissertation is essentially a critical examination of the traditional and reformatory approaches of international bankruptcy law in Canada, England, and the United States. It highlights the shortcomings of the traditional law and the inherent limitations, contradictions, and inconsistencies of its applicable mechanism; the doctrines of private international law. The dissertation further argues that the reform schemes thus far advanced suffer from jurisdictional problems and fall short of ensuring optimal outcomes for international bankruptcy cases. Although some of these reform schemes achieve the desired equality of distribution, they unnecessarily entail a reduction in the value of distributable assets by carrying out piecemeal liquidations of local assets in order to satisfy some local claims. […] Cette thèse contient principalement une étude critique des conceptions traditionnelles et réformatrices de la loi sur la faillite internationale au Canada, en Angleterre et États-Unis. Elle éclaire les insuffisances de la loi traditionnelle ausi qua les limitations, contradictions et incohérences des mécanismes qui lui sont inhérents: les principes du droit international privé. Cette thèse soutient en outre que les plans de la reforme formulés jusque-là sont affectés par des problèmes d'organisation judiciaire et n'aboutissent pas à assurer les meilleurs résultats pour les procédures de faillite internationale. Quoique certains de ces projets de réforme réalisent l’égalité de distribution recherchée, ils entrainent une diminution inutile de la valeur des biens distribuables en provoquant des liquidations fragmentaires de biens situés sur place, en vue de satisfaire certaines réclamations locales. […]

This dissertation is essentially a critical examination of the traditional and reformatory approaches of international bankruptcy law in Canada, England, and the United States. It highlights the shortcomings of the traditional law and the inherent limitations, contradictions, and inconsistencies of its applicable mechanism; the doctrines of private international law. The dissertation further argues that the reform schemes thus far advanced suffer from jurisdictional problems and fall short of ensuring optimal outcomes for international bankruptcy cases. Although some of these reform schemes achieve the desired equality of distribution, they unnecessarily entail a reduction in the value of distributable assets by carrying out piecemeal liquidations of local assets in order to satisfy some local claims. […] Cette thèse contient principalement une étude critique des conceptions traditionnelles et réformatrices de la loi sur la faillite internationale au Canada, en Angleterre et États-Unis. Elle éclaire les insuffisances de la loi traditionnelle ausi qua les limitations, contradictions et incohérences des mécanismes qui lui sont inhérents: les principes du droit international privé. Cette thèse soutient en outre que les plans de la reforme formulés jusque-là sont affectés par des problèmes d'organisation judiciaire et n'aboutissent pas à assurer les meilleurs résultats pour les procédures de faillite internationale. Quoique certains de ces projets de réforme réalisent l’égalité de distribution recherchée, ils entrainent une diminution inutile de la valeur des biens distribuables en provoquant des liquidations fragmentaires de biens situés sur place, en vue de satisfaire certaines réclamations locales. […]