Bibliographie sélective OHADA

Sub-Saharan Africa has, in recent years, been classified as a natural-resource play for foreign investors. These investment potentials have made the region one of the most attractive investment destinations in the world. The region is also diverse, with a mix of different legal systems and legal traditions. While investors are constantly seeking to understand the different legal regimes, international arbitration offers comfort by providing a framework for the enforcement of rights in a neutral forum and on a different platform. According to the World Bank, the ability to enforce an arbitral award is an important factor for investors considering potential markets in which to invest.Given the sixtieth anniversary celebration of the New York Convention (NY Convention), this article examines the enforcement regimes for arbitral awards in sub-Saharan Africa. It considers the momentous developments in the enforcement regimes in the region, due to the implementation of the NY Convention. It examines the proposed amendments to the enforcement provisions in the Nigerian Arbitration Act (Repeal and Re-enactment) Bill 2017, recently passed by the Nigerian Senate. It also examines the important provisions in the revised Uniform Act on the Law of Arbitration and the revised Rules of Arbitration of the Common Court of Justice and Arbitration – both recently adopted by the OHADA Council of Ministers. It attempts a comparison between the enforcement regimes in the OHADA Member States, the NY Convention Member States, and in countries that do not belong to any of the two regimes.A chart of the legal regimes on enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in sub-Saharan Africa is attached as appendix.

Quase 10 anos após a eclosão da Crise de 2008, seguimos insistindo em velhas soluções para problemas econômicos recorrentes, e os remédios regulatórios que têm emergido em resposta à crise continuam fundamentalmente baseados no tradicional paradigma econômico neoclássico que pressupõe que o ser humano é um agente econômico infalivelmente racional, conforme o modelo do Homo economicus, desconsiderando-se as evidências empíricas em sentido contrário que nos trazem as ciências cognitivas em geral, e a economia comportamental em particular. Pois, lançando mão dessas descobertas, nossa tese é a de que a análise econômico-comportamental do direito deve ser usada como instrumento para prescrever políticas públicas capazes de aprimorar a regulamentação do mercado financeiro. Para tanto, dividimos nosso trabalho em três grandes capítulos. No primeiro capítulo, tecemos uma narrativa da Crise de 2008, com ênfase nas circunstâncias em que foi engendrada, e discorremos sobre como a economia neoclássica explica suas causas. No segundo capítulo, explicamos a economia comportamental e a análise econômico-comportamental do direito, contrapondo-as à economia neoclássica e à análise econômica do direito. No terceiro capítulo, defendemos que a explicação neoclássica da crise é incorreta, e tecemos uma narrativa alternativa da Crise de 2008 com base na economia comportamental. Finalmente, criticamos as principais respostas regulatórias que têm sido dadas à Crise de 2008, demonstrando que continuam se baseando quase que exclusivamente na economia neoclássica, e fazemos propostas alternativas de regulamentação inspiradas na análise econômico-comportamental do direito, a fim de provar nossa tese de que esta disciplina realmente deve ser usada para prescrever políticas públicas a fim de aprimorar a regulamentação do mercado financeiro.

Section 71(3) of the Companies Act 71 of 2008 has introduced into South African company law a provision which for the first time permits the board of directors to remove another director from office in certain specific instances. A further significant innovation in the Companies Act 71 of 2008 is contained in section 162, which empowers a court to make an order declaring a director delinquent or placing him under probation in specific instances. The effect of section 162 is that a court is empowered to remove a director from the board of directors. The focus of this thesis is the removal of directors from office by the board of directors and by the judiciary. The thesis explores the underpinning philosophy of the statutory provisions relating to the removal of directors from office. It also examines the impact of the power given to the board of directors and to the courts to remove a director from office. The grounds and the procedures for the removal of directors by the board of directors and the judiciary are examined. The fiduciary duties applicable to directors in removing a director from the board of directors are also explored. In addition, this thesis examines the removal of directors holding multiple positions or capacities in relation to a company, such as an employee or a shareholder with loaded voting rights. The remedies which may be relied on by a director who has been removed from office by the board of directors are examined. Recommendations are made to strengthen and improve the provisions in the Companies Act 71 of 2008 relating to the removal of directors from office by the board of directors and the judiciary. Amendments to the Companies Act 71 of 2008 are suggested to remove ambiguities; to guard against the abuse of sections 71(3) and 162; to improve the grounds and procedures for the removal of directors by the board of directors and the judiciary, and to enhance the remedies that may be relied on by a director who has been removed from office by the board of directors.

Foreign investments in SADC are regulated by Annex 1 of the SADC Protocol on Finance and Investments (SADC FIP), as well as the laws of SADC Member States. At present, SADC faces the challenge that this regime for the regulation of foreign investments is unstable, unsatisfactory and unpredictable. Furthermore, the state of the rule of law in some SADC Member States is unsatisfactory. This negatively affects the security of foreign investments regulated by this regime. The main reasons for this state of affairs are briefly explained below. The regulatory regime for foreign investments in SADC is unstable, due to recent policy reviews and amendments of key regulatory instruments that have taken place. Major developments in this regard have been the suspension of the SADC Tribunal during 2010, the amendment of the SADC Tribunal Protocol during 2014 to bar natural and legal persons from access to the Tribunal, and the amendment of Annex 1 during 2016 to remove investor access to international investor-state arbitration, better known as investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS). The regulation of foreign investments in SADC has been unsatisfactory, among others because some SADC Member States have failed or neglected to harmonise their investment laws with both the 2006 and the 2016 Annex 1. Furthermore, SADC Member States such as Angola, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Malawi, Mauritius, Seychelles, Eswatini, Tanzania, Zambia, and Zimbabwe have multiple Regional Economic Community (REC) memberships. This places these Member States in a position whereby they have conflicting interests and treaty obligations. Finally, the future of the regime for the regulation of foreign investments in SADC is unpredictable, due to regional integration efforts such as the recent formation of the COMESA-EAC-SADC Tripartite Free Zone (T-FTA) and the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA). The T-FTA is entitled to have its investment protocol, while the AfCFTA investment protocol will be negotiated from 2018 until 2020. These developments entail that the 2016 Annex 1 will soon be replaced by an investment protocol at either the T-FTA or AfCFTA levels, thereby ushering a new regime for the regulation of foreign investments in SADC. The unknown nature of the future regulations create uncertainty and instability among foreign investors and host states alike. This study analyses the regulation of foreign investments in terms of Annex 1 and selected laws of SADC Member States. In the end, it makes the three findings mentioned above. In order to address these findings, the study makes four recommendations. The first is that foreign investments in SADC must be regulated at African Union (AU) level, by means of an AfCFTA investment protocol (which incidentally is now the case). Secondly, investor-state disputes must be referred to the courts of a host state, optional ISDS, the African Court of Justice and Human Rights (ACJ&HR) or other agreed forum. Thirdly, an African Justice Scoreboard (AJS) must be established. The AJS will act as a gateway to determine whether an investor-state dispute shall be referred to the courts of a host state, ISDS, the ACJ&HR or other forums. Fourthly, the office of an African Investment Ombud (AIO) must be created. The AIO shall facilitate the early resolution of investor-state disputes, so as to reduce the number of disputes that may end-up in litigation or arbitration.

The objective of this research was to determine the current status of the application of the OHADA accounting system in DRC, five years after its adoption. A survey was conducted on thirty small and medium-sized enterprises in Bukavu to determine the level of compliance with the SYSCOHADA principles, the degree of harmonization of accounting practices and the difficulties related to the application of this system. The results shown consistently that compliance with Syscohada principles is not absolute, the level of Harmonization is still low and finally companies in DRC still need time to fit into the OHADA accounting system.

Les États ouest-africains ont fait de l’intégration économique la voie privilégiée pour relever le défi du développement économique dans un contexte international de plus en plus concurrentiel. Ainsi, par le biais d’organisations régionale et sous régionale, la protection du libre jeu de la concurrence est devenue un enjeu communautaire. L’intégration économique régionale ouest-africaine a donc été saisie par le droit de la concurrence. De ce fait, on assiste à l’émergence de droits régionaux de la concurrence au sein de l’Union économique et monétaire ouest africaine (UEMOA) et de la Communauté économique des États de l’Afrique de l’Ouest (CEDEAO). Chacune de ces organisations a donc mis en place un droit de la concurrence dans son espace économique. Il en résulte, vu la composition de l’UEMOA et de la CEDEAO, que ces droits communautaires ont vocation à s’appliquer aux États membres de l’Union qui font également partie de la Communauté. Cette particularité de la coexistence de ces règles communautaires de la concurrence en Afrique de l’Ouest méritait qu’on s’y attarde afin d’évaluer leur application, d’analyser l’effectivité et l’efficacité de ces droits. Cette étude comparative s’est attachée à mettre en exergue ce que renferment ces droits, à relever leurs spécificités, tout en mettant en lumière leurs insuffisances. Il apparaît nécessaire de repenser, voire de réformer certains aspects de ces droits afin d’améliorer leurs applications, gage d’une meilleure protection de la libre concurrence en Afrique de l’Ouest.

L’imprévision est un thème à la frontière entre liberté contractuelle et justice contractuelle. Cependant, un nouveau regard peut être porté sur cette institution du droit des contrats grâce à la théorie des contrats relationnels développée par Ian R. Macneil ou encore à travers le contrat-coopération théorisé par Suzanne Lequette. Ces théories invitent à prendre en considération la valeur intrinsèque du lien contractuel et l’incomplétude du contrat. L’imprévision fait donc partie intégrante des contrats relationnels de par leur nature. La vocation première des contrats relationnels est de perdurer, obligeant les contractants à des normes de coopération et de flexibilité. Sous couvert de bonne foi, la relationnalité serait le fondement des changements de circonstances. Une étude comparative du régime des changements de circonstances apporte certaines précisions. Il semble exister deux approches des changements de circonstances, l’une restreinte aux modifications économiques et l’autre étendue, basée sur l’objectif ou le fondement contractuel. Une approche étendue de l’imprévision semble nécessaire dans les contrats relationnels. Enfin, les effets des changements de circonstances devraient donner priorité au maintien de la relation et à la norme de coopération en imposant une renégociation puis en permettant une adaptation judiciaire des termes de l’engagement. La résiliation, contraire à la nature des contrats relationnels, ne devrait intervenir qu’exceptionnellement.

Historical context. Scope of application of cross border merger. A comparison of class rights with minority protection in cross border merger. The transposition of the cross border merger in the German law for an implementation.

L'Algérie a engagé une politique de libéralisation de son économie et cherche à intégrer l’économie mondiale pour sortir de sa dépendance des hydrocarbures et diversifier son économie. Une politique incitative est mise en place pour accueillir les investissements direct étrangers qui constituent un enjeu majeur pour l’accroissement des échanges, le transfert de technologie, la mise à niveau des sociétés locales et la création d’emploi. D’un autre côté la mise en place d’une économie de marché exige un environnement juridique efficace et stable qui définit clairement les droits et obligations des opérateurs économiques notamment en matière de conclusion de contrats. Le cadre théorique que nous retenons pour répondre à cette question est l’analyse de la place des conventions fiscales dans l’ordre fiscal algérien et sa corrélation avec la politique de promotion des investissements. Les conventions fiscales sont telles réellement au service de l’investissement ? Pour ce faire nous avons mis en exergue tout au long de nos développements l’examen des conventions fiscales à l’épreuve des contrats internationaux permettant d’améliorer la lisibilité et la transparence de la norme fiscale afin de favoriser l’attractivité du territoire

O presente trabalho intitula-se “Arbitragem Tributária em Cabo Verde: Um olhar sobre novos desafios” e tem como principais objetivos analisar o instituto da Arbitragem Tributária em Cabo Verde, caraterizar e refletir sobre o modelo implementado, bem como as principais oposições à sua implementação no referido país. Em Cabo Verde, criar e assegurar o funcionamento de meios de resolução alternativos de litígios, em particular a Arbitragem, funciona como um instrumento essencial e complementar aos tribunais judiciais, tendo em conta a nova realidade política, social e económica do país. A introdução da Arbitragem Tributária em Cabo Verde deu-se através da Lei nº 108/VIII/2016, de 28 de Janeiro e foi motivada essencialmente pela nova ordem de reforma do sistema jurídico, altura em que o Governo do país assumiu o desafio de aperfeiçoar o sistema e promover uma maior competitividade perante os mercados externos, e captação do investimento estrangeiros. A implementação da Arbitragem Tributária em Cabo Verde pode ser equiparada, com as necessárias adaptações, ao sistema Português, daí darmos uma grande importância ao longo do nosso estudo a experiência portuguesa. Não obstante, um dos principais obstáculos à sua implementação em Cabo Verde tem a ver com a falta de clareza a nível da norma estabelecida pela Constituição da República, permanecendo a dúvida de em qual das classificações - “Tribunais” ou na classificação de “Órgão não Jurisdicional de composição de conflitos” - deve ser inserido o Tribunal Tributário. A Arbitragem Tributária como forma alternativa de resolução de conflito em Cabo Verde terá grande relevo na incrementação das políticas económicas e sociais, na melhoria do negócio e na captação do investimento estrangeiro, para melhor desenvolvimento do país.

Cette réflexion examine l’apport des formations de l’École régionale supérieure de la magistrature (ERSUMA) et des commissions nationales dans la préservation de la sécurité juridique et judiciaire des affaires dans l’espace OHADA. Nous postulons que pour préserver et maintenir la sécurité juridique et judiciaire des opérateurs économiques et possiblement conquérir d’autres « cieux », l’intensification de la vulgarisation du droit OHADA constitue un impératif méritant une réponse continuelle. C’est un droit qui a encore besoin « d’apôtres » pour s’imposer dans l’univers juridique contemporain comme un droit de référence attrayant pour les investisseurs.Ces institutions de formation ont certes accompli des efforts immenses, mais l’efficacité et l’envergure de leurs interventions se heurtent aux obstacles financiers et à l’absence d’institutionnalisation des commissions nationales. L’autofinancement constitue le pilier du développement des activités durables de formation pour l’exécution desquelles la générosité des partenaires étrangers ne suffit plus. Pour transcender ces barrières d’ordre financier et engager la protection juridique et judiciaire dans une logique de durabilité, la pérennisation des formations ERSUMA à travers la mutualisation des efforts avec d’autres institutions constitue une des solutions porteuses d’espoir. Concomitamment, la mise en place d’un nouvel organe de relations publiques pour initier une approche commerciale beaucoup plus « agressive » au sein de l’ERSUMA nous paraît d’une nécessité impérieuse.L’institutionnalisation des commissions nationales OHADA constitue aussi un élément de réponse pour fédérer les organes de formation au sein de l’OHADA et leur donner une impulsion d’ensemble.

The aim of this thesis is to investigate the economic and financial substance of certain contractual requirements imposed by Islamic commercial law as well as some of their implications. More attention is given to requirements that have financial implications and are related to those discussed in the contract theory literature. We divide our investigation into four parts. The first part is an examination of the fundamental transactional requirements in Islamic commercial law, focusing on those related to four primary Islamic Financial Securities (IFSs). In the second part, we use our findings to construct an alternative asset pricing methodology. We also explore our findings in the third and fourth parts using the principal-agent model of Holmström and Milgrom (1991). More specifically, we use it to respectively model the relationship between underwriters and Islamic commercial law regulators as well as consider the case of ambiguous incentive contracts. Each part of our investigation has yielded substantial contributions to the literature as follows. Firstly, our examination of Islamic commercial law principles and contracts reveals that there are indeed legal requirements which have direct implications for financial models, such as the need for a liquidity discount in receivables-based ṣukūk as they are – in principle – non-tradeable. Secondly, the asset-pricing model we have constructed allows us to examine the equilibrium return and investment levels of IFSs. This allows us to derive conditions at which one security yields higher returns than another. Thirdly, our cooperation model suggests that cooperation between underwriters and Islamic commercial law regulators is only beneficial for an issuer of a structured Islamic financial product if their synergy benefits are over a certain level. Lastly, our investigation into ambiguous incentive contracts demonstrates that it is never beneficial for principals to offer such contracts to ambiguity averse individuals as it unambiguously reduces the principal’s profit.

This dissertation aims to answer a fundamental question relating to the South African legal and economic framework in which private equity operates. This being: To what extent does the law address/regulate the structure of private equity funds and the relationships between the various parties related to a fund, that is: investors, the fund manager and underlying portfolio investments? This thesis also discussed how the law could better regulate the private equity industry. The dissertation consists of five chapters. Chapter one raises such fundamental questions as ‘what is the nature of private equity?’ by looking at the parties involved, the private equity cycle, returns, liquidity, the risk, and the private equity market. In addition, it assesses whether private equity satisfies the criteria to be regarded as a separate asset class. Chapter two provides an analysis of the key features of private equity fund formation in South Africa. The choice of the most appropriate legal structure of a private equity fund starts with the choice of the most effective and suitable legal vehicle. Chapter two includes a discussion of the general private equity fund structure, the regulatory requirements of private equity firms, and certain regulatory considerations relevant in operating a private equity fund in South Africa. The discussion at certain instances reference private equity fund formation in foreign jurisdictions such the US, UK, Australia, and Canada. Chapter three introduces an analysis of corporate governance as it pertains to private equity funds. Firstly, it discusses the role of corporate governance regulation in stimulating investment. Secondly, it discusses the importance and benefits of corporate governance from the perspective of private equity managers; and seeks to explain the link between the private equity business model and corporate governance that is based on the assertion that there are two levels of corporate governance involved in private equity investing. The first level of governance relates to the private equity fund’s underlying portfolio investee companies and this includes inter alia, a discussion on the duties of the fund manager, particularly in their capacity as serving as directors on the boards of such companies. The second level of governance relates to the private equity fund itself which focuses on the relationship between the private equity firm and the investors that invest in the private equity fund. Chapter four examines two key impediments namely tax legislation and exit alternatives; and show how legislation could effectively address the former and how the lack of exit routes is an impediment to the growth of the local private equity industry. Chapter five states that, the development of the above mentioned regulatory framework will only be successful if the private equity industry participants themselves acknowledge and actively address the disadvantages and real risks posed by the private equity industry on the South African financial system.