Bibliographie sélective OHADA

Tezimizin amacı, ortaklığın anayasası niteliğinde sayılan anasözleşmedeki değişikliklerin, hangi temel esaslar dahilinde yapılabileceğini ortaya koymak, değişikliğin şekli, kapsamı, usulü, sınırları ve sonuçları konusundaki mevzuat hükümlerini, doktrin görüşleri ve uygulama sorunları ile birlikte incelemektir. Çalışmamızda, ayrı birer tez konusu yapılmış veya yapılabilecek ayrıntılar içeren, esas sermaye artırımı, sermaye azaltımı gibi özel anasözleşme değişiklikleri tek tek incelenmek yerine, tüm anasözleşme değişikliklerinde geçerli olan temel esaslar incelenmeye çalışılmış, esas sermaye artırımı ve azaltımına özgü ve genel değişikliklerden farklı olan özel düzenlemeler kapsam dışı bırakılmıştır. 1 Temmuz 2012 tarihinde yürürlüğe girecek olan Yeni Türk Ticaret Kanununun konumuzla ilgili hükümleri de 6762 Sayılı Türk Ticaret Kanunu hükümleri ile karşılaştırmalı olarak tezimizde incelenmiştir. Üç ana bölümden oluşan tezimizin ilk bölümünde anasözleşme kavramı ve hukuki niteliği üzerinde durulmuş ve Alman, İsviçre, Türk öğretisindeki görüşler doğrultusunda anasözleşmenin hukuki niteliği konusunda bir sonuca varılmaya çalışılmıştır. Anasözleşme değişikliği konusunda çıkış noktamız olan anasözleşme içeriği de yine bu bölümde TTK ve YTTK hükümleri karşılaştırmalı olarak ele alınarak incelenmiştir. İkinci bölümde, öncelikle değişiklik kavramı üzerinde durulmuş ve hangi tür değişikliklerin anasözleşme değişikliği kapsamında değerlendirilmesi gerektiği tespit edilmeye çalışılmıştır. Değişiklik usul ve şartları konusu ise, değişiklik metninin hazırlanması, gerekiyorsa Sanayi ve Ticaret Bakanlığından izin alınması, değişikliğin genel kurulda karara bağlanması, imtiyazlı paysahiplerinin onayı ile ticaret siciline tescil ve ilan alt başlıkları çerçevesinde ele alınmıştır. Çalışmamızın son bölümü anasözleşme değişikliğinin sınırları ve denetimine ayrılmıştır. Bu kapsamda özellikle vazgeçilmez ve müktesep haklarla, imtiyazlı paylardan doğan hakların anasözleşme değişikliklerine çizmiş oldukları sınırlar kanun hükümleri kapsamında tespit edilmeye çalışılmıştır. Aynı bölümde, anasözleşme değişikliğinin hükümsüzlüğü ve denetimi başlığı altında, yokluk, butlan, iptal edilebilirlik ve askıda hükümsüzlük halleri üzerinde genel hatlarıyla durulmuştur. The purpose of this thesis is to put forward the main principles through which the amendments in the main contract, considered to be the constitution of partnership, could be made and to analyze provisions of the legislation together with doctrinal views and implementation issues regarding the form, scope, procedures (mode), limits and results of amendment.In this study, rather than focusing on specific main contract amendments with details that have been or could be the subject of a separate thesis such as the increase or reduction in authorized capital, the basic principles that apply to all main contract amendments were analyzed and the arrangements specific to increase and reduction in authorized capital and special arrangements, which are different from general amendments, were left out of the scope of the study.The relevant provisions of the new Turkish Commercial Code, which will come into force on 1 July 2012, are examined in this thesis in comparison with the provisions of the Turkish Commercial Law No. 6762. This thesis is consists of three main parts. In the first part, the emphasis is on the concept of main contract and its legal attributes; and in accordance with the legal opinions stemming from the German, Swiss and Turkish doctrines the first part tries to reach a conclusion regarding the legal attributes of the main contract.The content of the main contract, which is the point of departure regarding the main contract amendment, is also analyzed in this part by means of discussing the provisions of the TCL in comparison with that of the NTCC. The second part primarily focused on the concept of amendment and sought to determine what kind of amendments should be evaluated within the scope of main contract amendment.The issue of procedures and conditions for the amendment is elaborated under the subheadings: the preparation of the text of amendment, (if necessary) the authorization from the Ministry of Industry and Commerce, the decree for the amendment in the general assembly, registration at the trade registry and promulgation with the approval of the privileged shareholders.The last part of the thesis is on the limits and supervision of main contract amendment. Within this context, this part tried to determine the limits stipulated for the main contract amendments under the provisions of the law particularly by indispensable and vested rights as well as the rights incurred from concessional shares. Within the same part, under the heading/title of invalidity of the main contract amendment the cases of absence, voidness, revocation and pending invalidity have been analyzed in general terms.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the legal effects of state succession on cultural property. This is not a new topic of international law. Indeed, the attempts to provide a legal framework for the cultural aspects of state succession have been undertaken in international practice and legal scholarship since at least the mid-nineteenth century. Initially, these were strictly bound to the origin of the European nation-state, determining its territorial boundaries accordingly to ethnic and cultural divisions. However, the concept of cultural property in international law has evolved towards a broader, more human-oriented idea of cultural heritage. Such a conceptual shift has occurred in the last fifty years, marked by the gradual recognition of the fundamental role performed by cultural manifestations in the preservation of human dignity and the continuous development of all mankind. This study discusses to what extent the practice and the theory of state succession reflect this evolution. It attempts to reconstruct the principles regulating interstate arrangements with regard to such matters, contextualizing them in a broad historical and geographical framework. Particular attention has been paid to the question of state succession to international cultural heritage obligations. This piece of work explores their content, sources and status in state succession. It explains that nowadays the preservation and enjoyment of cultural heritage do not constitute the exclusive concern of state sovereignty. On the contrary, such values are of general interest to the international community as a whole. Therefore, the study advocates a new doctrinal approach, based both on the principles of international cultural heritage law and human rights law. This implies the limitation of the contractual freedom of states in the matter of cultural agreements, in favour of the continuity of international cultural heritage obligations in cases of state succession. Finally, the study proposes a list of guiding principles relating to the succession of states in respect of tangible cultural heritage, which may contribute to the further development of international practice.

Le processus de règlement des litiges par la voie de l’arbitrage a nourri des ambitions économiques énormes dans les sphères juridiques où ce mécanisme a été instauré. L’efficacité de ce processus qui signifie entre autre un processus ayant abouti à une application, voire une exécution effective des protagonistes est un gage de la réalisation de ces ambitions. Or, ce processus peut être compromis du fait de l’annulation de la sentence arbitrale par un juge dont l’intervention dans le processus peut soit le renforcer, soit l’annihiler fondamentalement. Cette situation explique dans une large mesure les raisons pour lesquelles la doctrine juridique se place en faveur d’une collaboration solide entre la justice publique et la justice privée de l’arbitrage. Comment cette question de l’annulation de la sentence arbitrale est abordée dans les sphères juridiques du Québec et de l’Ohada? Quels sont les effets juridiques issus de la comparaison de cette situation dans chacune de ces sphères? Telle se présente la substance de cette recherche dont la méthode comparative est alimentée par le paradigme de l’herméneutique juridique et son corollaire le pluralisme juridique. Les résultats issus du dialogue comparatif devraient participer à une amélioration des situations problématiques décelées dans les sphères concernées. The rule process of lawsuits based on arbitration has filled out huge economic ambitions related to judicial spheres where this mechanism has been established. The efficiency of this process, which among others, has led to an application, indeed a real execution of the protagonists, is somewhat a guarantee to the fulfilment of these ambitions. However, this process can be compromised because of the cancellation of the arbitral sentence by a judge whose intervention in the process can either reinforce it or destroy it. This situation mainly explains the reasons why the juridical doctrine is in favour of a solid collaboration. How do the juridical sphere of Quebec and Ohada tackle this issue of the cancellation of the arbitral sentence? What are the juridical effects stemmed from the comparism of this situation in both spheres? The way the substance of this research appears and whose comparative method is fed by the paradigm of the juridical hermeneutics and its juridical pluralism corollary. The results stemmed from the comparative dialog should participate in improving problematic situations detected in the applied spheres.

La présente thèse renvoie à un essai théorique et comparatif sur le concept d'illicéité en matière de responsabilité civile extracontractuelle pour le fait personnel. L'impérieuse nécessité d'une étude de l'illicéité se déduit de la volonté de reconnaître explicitement un tel concept et de le concevoir comme un fait générateur de responsabilité civile extracontractuelle dans le système québécois, c'est-à-dire de lui conférer une autonomie et une fonctionnalité propres. Une telle reconnaissance de l'illicéité apparaît sans conteste novatrice dans la doctrine juridique québécoise et exige une clarification de notions périphériques à l'illicite, que ce soit l'illégalité ou la faute. Le Titre premier se confine à poser les assises dogmatiques de l'illicéité au regard de sa signification et des acteurs en présence, dans la sphère civiliste de la responsabilité extracontracruelle pour le fait personnel. Il poursuit un objectif essentiel de clarification : d'abord, l'identification des couches conceptuelles de l'illicéité dans ses prédicats objectif et subjectif; ensuite, son sens envisagé du point de vue de l'auteur responsable et que l'on doit réfuter du point de vue de la victime exclusivement. Le Titre second ouvre la voie à un questionnement sur l'opportunité d'introduire la notion d'illicéité dans le système québécois de la responsabilité civile extracontractuelle pour le fait personnel. Il est alors indispensable d'investiguer dans des traditions juridiques civilistes helvétique et française qui manient le concept afin d'appuyer sa reconnaissance dans notre droit. Il poursuit un dessein primordial d'innovation qui consiste à jauger les avantages et les obstacles dirimants à la reconnaissance d'une portée normative propre de l'illicite.

<p>This thesis analyzes the concept of corporate residence, with particular reference to the law in the UK and Canada. It explores why corporate residence is relevant in tax policy, how corporate residence is understood in law, and how revenue authorities respond to the use and alleged 'abuse' of residence rules. Part I argues that the residence of taxpayers generally (individual or corporate) remains a relevant factor in international tax design, that taxation of corporations on the basis of residence has some justification, but that there is a disjunction between meaningful residence-based taxation and current definitions of corporate residence in domestic law and tax treaties. The formulations of residence based on incorporation, central management and control, and place of effective management, particularly as applied to multinational enterprises, are considered and are found to be deficient. Part II critically analyzes the major policy responses of the UK and Canadian governments to the exploitation of corporate residence. It argues that key legislative and administrative responses to international tax avoidance activities, for both outbound and inbound investment, are purportedly based on the acceptance of formal corporate residence yet undermine that concept in an effort to impose tax or refuse treaty relief based on where economic interests actually exist. The responses considered are the application of controlled foreign companies legislation to offshore subsidiaries, the invocation of treaty anti-abuse rules with respect to offshore intermediaries, and the use of overarching general anti-avoidance measures to challenge varied structures that rely on offshore entities. These haphazard anti-avoidance rules are overlaid with revenue authorities' indignation at the motivations that underlie many corporate relocations. It is argued that a more coherent approach would be to focus on the objective reality or unreality of corporate establishment, by reformulating corporate residence in domestic law and tax treaties.</p>

In this thesis space technology trade and proliferation controls are analyzed, focusing on two substantive issues that illustrate the challenges and opportunities of reform. The first substantive issue examined is the challenge of domestic law and policy reform in light of international regulatory divergence. This issue is examined through a case study of the U.S. commercial communication satellite export control regime. The second issue is the international implications of space technology trade and proliferation control on global civil space cooperation. The unifying demonstration of this doctoral thesis is that States operate in an international legal system that perpetuates a self-justified security dilemma whose basis originates in the sovereign legal right of States to produce, procure, and maintain space technologies of a military nature. As a result, the international legal system governing space technology trade and proliferation creates a tension between perceived national security needs and the benefits of global cooperation.

The Southern African Development Community (SADC), formerly known as the Southern African Development Coordination Conference (SADCC), is an organization of Southern African states initially formed to reduce economic dependence on South Africa (then an Apartheid state) and to harmonize and coordinate development in the region. The vision and mission of SADC reach well beyond the harmonization of development within the region. It extends to fields that include political stability, peace building, the maintenance of security and justice as well as economic cooperation. The attainment of these goals requires well co-ordinated regional mechanisms; as such over the past decade member states have paid particular attention to the possibility of attaining these goals through regional integration. The transformation from SADCC to SADC indicated that the body would no longer be a loose association (conference) of states but rather a regional body that would have a legally binding effect on its member states. The question is, when the member states assembled in Windhoek, August 1992, did they create an institutional framework, and policies that would have enough legal force to ensure that the institutional agenda of integration is not defeated by member states? The argument of this dissertation is that the Treaty and the policies established afterwards contain principle imperfections that are self defeating for the pursuance of regional integration. The work will begin by discussing regional integration in general, highlighting the historical origins of SADC as well as the role of the African Union. The work will then discuss the dimensions and functioning of SADC, laying the foundation for a proper critique on how the institutional framework contains inherent weaknesses that eventually hinder the progression of SADC. The dissertation ultimately will discuss and benchmark the European Union against SADC, in an attempt to extract important lessons for the progression of SADC.

La compétence d'un arbitre chargé d'appliquer le droit international des investissements exige l'existence préalable d'un investissement étranger. Cette étude vise à identifier ce qui constitue un investissement parmi l'ensemble des opérations économiques et financières et à déterminer les conditions auxquelles il doit répondre pour être considéré comme étranger. L'importance de la Convention de Washington explique l'attention particulière portée au Centre international pour le règlement des différends relatifs aux investissements (CIRDI). La diversité des traités bilatéraux et des autres sources normatives dans ce domaine a conduit à proposer une approche fondée sur une dissociation du contrôle sur la base des sources normatives de la compétence arbitrale. Après un exposé introductif sur l'évolution des modes de règlement des différends relatifs à la propriété étrangère et son aboutissement à l'arbitrage international actuel, la première partie de l'étude est consacrée à la définition de la notion juridique d'investissement dans une perspective de qualification par l'arbitre. La seconde partie analyse la seconde exigence pour établir la compétence de l'arbitre, celle d'extranéité de l'investissement, et elle expose les conditions liées à la nationalité de l'investisseur.

To be made effective, class action settlements must be negotiated fairly, be perceived as fair and reasonable by the settlement parties such that they agree to their terms and substance, and be characterized as fair, reasonable and adequate by a court at the occasion of a settlement approval hearing. But how is settlement fairness defined, in a collective litigation context? By which process is the evaluation of fairness made and the approval given by the court? What role does the court correspondingly have, in that context? This thesis explores the legal policy and reasoning behind the mandatory judicial approval of class settlements, the process by which it is sought and obtained, the currently relevant factors and indicia of settlement fairness which support all decisions to approve, and the roles of the principal settlement actors, particularly the settlement judge. It suggests hypotheses for reform applicable to these approval processes, roles of the actors and standard of settlement fairness. These hypotheses are tested, for their plausibility, against empirical data obtained from the qualitative interviews of seventeen judges conducted by the author in four target jurisdictions that have similar approaches to class action settlement approvals, and where class action litigation activity is heavy: Quebec, Ontario, British Columbia, and the United States federal courts. Ultimately, the thesis proposes final recommendations for reform of the class action settlement approval procedure.

Will harmonization of legislation relating to the management of ships’ ballast water be achieved, once IMOs’ 2004 Convention enters into force?

This thesis addresses issues of anti-dumping law and practice from a critical and juridical analysis position. In particular, the thesis seeks to determine whether the South African anti-dumping regime is compliant with the anti-dumping regime of the World Trade Organization (hereafter WTO), and to consider possible solutions for addressing instances where the South African law is not WTO compatible. The thesis departs from the hypothesis that the WTO merely requires functional equivalence of the implementation of national legislation on anti-dumping, and not the verbatim adoption of WTO jurisprudence and relevant provisions of the Agreement on the Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade of 1994 (hereafter URAA), into the legislation of State Parties. Some of the provisions of the URAA are not completely clear, and are cast in convoluted and complicated technical jargon, leaving loopholes that may be justifiably exploited by State Parties. The study in this thesis was achieved through the critical analysis of legislation and relevant legal documents, case law and contemporary literature. The primary research paradigm used in this study is interpretive and analytical, which is the same as qualitative research methodology. The legal comparative research method, with a historical component, also played an important role in this study. The literature study undertaken and the critical analyses made of the South African anti-dumping regime show mixed findings. The South African antidumping regime was found to have both positive aspects and problematic aspects when compared with WTO regulations. Some of the critical areas of the South African anti-dumping regime are WTO compatible whilst others are not. In some areas the South African anti-dumping regime has adopted functionally equivalent provisions to the provisions of the WTO law. However, the practice of the International Trade Administration Commission (ITAC) is sometimes fraught with inconsistencies. The compatibility of the South African anti-dumping system with the WTO regime came close to being examined by the WTO on 1 April 1999 in the dispute of South Africa - Anti-dumping Duties on the Import of Certain Pharmaceutical Products from India based on allegations that the method for calculating normal value used by the ITAC was found to be inconsistent with the URAA. Similarly, the conformity of the procedures and findings of the International Trade and Administration Act (ITAA) in anti-dumping cases came under attack in the cases of Algorax v The International Trade Administration Commission and others, and Scaw v The International Trade Administration Commission and others, respectively. Finally, the thesis ends with recommendations in response to the challenges identified and key submissions made throughout the analysis. Key recommendations include the broadening of the concept of interested parties to include registered trade unions and trade union federations; introducing an explicit and mandatory "public Interests" provision to ensure that South Africa's anti-dumping administration is free from political trappings in the form of the involvement of the Minister of Trade and Industry; introducing the new section 31 bis of the ADR in order to allow the initiation of anti-dumping petitions by a registered trade union or trade union federation; providing procedural guidelines for self-initiation of anti-dumping petitions by the ITAC; increasing transparency in anti-dumping proceedings and enquires; setting realistic time-lines for all anti-dumping processes and ensuring compliance with the same; improving the institutional and functional capacity of the ITAC; amending section 18.3 of the ADR to allow search and seizure operations pursuant to the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 and the Customs Act; having a clear provision on verification visits confidentiality and a clear provision on producer knowledge; introducing a clear provision in the ADR dealing explicitly with zeroing pursuant to Article 2.4.3 (ii) of URAA; and the introduction of duty refund procedures. It is hoped that the recommendations made in this thesis, which are in the form of suggested legislative interventions required to upgrade certain areas of South African anti-dumping law and practice to be fully WTO compliant, will influence the introduction of suitably crafted anti-dumping legislation in South Africa. It is further hoped that the thesis will become an invaluable source of information for practitioners and students, and a critical source on the best practice for the imposition and implementation of anti-dumping measures. Moreover, the thesis will add to the body of academic writing on South African anti-dumping law.