Bibliographie sélective OHADA

Le principe de proportionnalité a été récemment reconnu dans les traités et les accords internationaux du commerce et des investissements avec l’État. Cependant, peu d'études se concentrent sur la nature juridique, le contenu, la portée et les fonctions de ce principe dans le droit économique international. Cette thèse présente une analyse actuelle et détaillée sur ces questions.

In an era of economic distress, some organizations have found refuge and growth potential in cooperation. Mediation, a highly recommended cooperative concept, has been enabled in certain countries but not all. Some applications lacked local cultural support making it, despite government efforts, a failure to launch. In this article, we investigate attempts to launch mediation in the Cairo Business Community (CBC). This study enabled us to revisit how Egyptian culture was prototyped by Hofstede and to question its representativeness. Hofstede has consistently described Egyptian culture as being highly cooperative / collectivist but our observations indicate that this culture is now more of an individualistic / competitive type, due to the tremendous economic difficulties that Egyptian society is going through. These difficulties and their impact on culture are at the heart of the explanation of the failure to launch mediation in the CBC.

L’organisation du règlement des litiges commerciaux en Afrique de l’ouest notamment dans les États Parties au Traité OHADA est marquée à la fois par l’intervention des juridictions nationales d’instance et d’appel et de la Cour commune de justice et d’arbitrage. En effet, la mise en place d’une législation commune en matière de droit des affaires a nécessité l’institution d’une Cour de cassation unique pour unifier la jurisprudence. L’uniformisation de la jurisprudence a conduit à la mise à l’écart des juridictions nationales supérieures de tout enjeu de règlement de litiges liés à l’application du droituniforme excepté les décisions appliquant des sanctions pénales. Dès lors, les relations entre les deux ordres de juridictions supérieures sont plus empreintes de conflits que basées sur un véritable dialogue des juges. Eu égard à ce qui précède, pour assurer aux opérateurs économiques un meilleur règlement de leurs litiges en évitant les difficultés liées au règlement judiciaire, il convient de promouvoir d’autres outils alternatifs de règlement des litiges. Dès lors, l’adoption des actes uniformes relatifs à l’arbitrage et à la médiation ont permis de donner aux opérateurs économiques, d’autres lieux alternatifs pour régler leurs litiges. En outre, le développement des centres d’arbitrage, de médiation et de conciliation semble être une alternative aux juridictions judiciaires. Au regard, des multiples saisines du centre d’arbitrage, de médiation et de conciliation de Ouagadougou par les banques et établissements financiers, les sociétés d’assurances, de transports et de télécommunications, les entreprises minières et énergétiques, l’on peut en déduire que ce centre joue un rôle important dans le règlement alternatif des litiges commerciaux en Afrique de l’ouest. The organization of the settlement of commercial disputes in West Africa, particularly in the States Parties to the OHADA Treaty, is marked by the intervention of national courts of instance and appeal and the Common Court of Justice and Arbitration. Indeed, the establishment of common business law legislation has necessitated the institution of a single Court of Cassation to unify jurisprudence. The standardization of jurisprudence has led to the exclusion of the higher national courts from any dispute resolution issues related to the application of uniform law, except for decisions applying criminalsanctions. Consequently, relations between the two orders of higher courts are more marked by conflict than based on a genuine dialogue between judges. In order to ensure that economic operators have a better settlement of their disputes by avoiding the difficulties associated with judicial settlement, alternative dispute resolution tools should be promoted. Consequently, the adoptions of the Uniform Acts on Arbitration and Mediation have made it possible to give economic operators other alternative places to settle their disputes. In addition, the development of arbitration, mediation and conciliation centers seems to be an alternative to judicial jurisdictions. In view of the numerous referrals to the Ouagadougou Arbitration, Mediation and Conciliation Center by banks and financialinstitutions, insurance, transport and telecommunications companies, mining and energy companies, it can be deduced that this center plays an important role in the alternative settlement of commercial disputes in West Africa.

Comment évoquer un tel sujet sans s’émouvoir d’un antagonisme certain ? Les spécialistes du droit de la famille, conscients de l’importance de l’indisponibilité des droits, de la place de l’ordre public en la matière, des enjeux de protections des personnes concernées, sont souvent réticents à penser au concept de l’arbitrage familial international. A l’inverse, les spécialistes de l’arbitrage, habitués aux vertus du système, s’empressent de promouvoir « l’arbitrage pour tous » afin de conquérir un nouveau marché et répondre à une nouvelle demande. Ainsi, un dilemme naît : les litiges familiaux internationaux sont-ils arbitrables ? Dans une telle hypothèse comment pourrait être mis en œuvre l’arbitrage familial international ? C’est un sujet d’actualité, controversé, qui repose sur une idée qui n’est pas novatrice : sa vulgarisation sur la scène internationale ne serait pas une révolution. Il n’en demeure pas moins qu’une prudence s’impose dans une matière aussi sensible que le droit international de la famille. Face à la contractualisation croissante du droit de la famille, une voie médiane, pragmatique, d’un arbitrage familial international pourrait s’organiser par l’insertion d’une convention d’arbitrage dans les contrats internationaux de droit de la famille avant tout litige pour anticiper, organiser, les points épineux et éviter de douloureux procès. This dissertation addresses an issue that cannot be discussed without provoking concerns stemming from an indubitable antagonism. Family law specialists, who are aware of the importance of the unavailability of family-related rights, of the role of public policy rules in this area, and of the challenges involved in the protection of the persons concerned, are often reluctant to consider the concept of international arbitration in family matters. Conversely, arbitration specialists, who are familiar with the virtues of this procedure, are keen to promote “arbitration for all” in order to enter a new market and address a new demand. This gives rise to a dilemma: can family-related disputes be subject to arbitration? If so, how could arbitration procedures be implemented in this area? This is a current and topical issue, relying on an idea that is not novel: its general application on the international scene would not amount to a revolution. It remains however that caution must prevail in an area as sensitive as international family law. While family law is increasingly dominated by a contractual approach, a median and pragmatic solution might favour international family arbitration through the insertion of an arbitration clause in international family law contracts prior to any dispute in order to anticipate any thorny issue that might arise and organise its resolution, thus avoiding painful litigation.

La constance dans l’arbitrage est sans doute la volonté dans le recours à ce mode de résolution de conflits. C’est parce que les parties trouvent un intérêt à l’arbitrage, qu’elles décident d’échapper à la compétence de principe des juridictions étatiques. Or, ce bel édifice est remis en cause par le législateur CIMA à l’article 276 par l’instauration d’une Commission Nationale d’arbitrage au sein des États membres dont les assureurs sont obligés de saisir lorsque nait un différend dans l’exercice des recours subrogatoires entre eux. Le paradoxe arbitral ainsi analysé comme ce qu’il est convenu d’appeler l’ « arbitrage forcé » n’empêche pas toute fois d’entrevoir dans ledit arbitrage institutionnel, un instrument au service de la justice et des assureurs tant les vertus sont variées.

The arbitration of internal trust disputes has attracted significant attention in the arbitration and trust law communities in recent years with draft clauses and rules produced by arbitral institutions, several states undertaking legislative reform in order to provide such arbitrations with a statutory basis and numerous scholars as well as practitioners writing articles on the subject. Such enthusiasm is justified on the basis that arbitration has several advantages over litigation, such as confidentiality, international enforceability of judgments, the ability to choose one’s judge and the power to tailor the procedure. Notwithstanding these advantages, trust arbitration has failed to make any great inroad into trust disputes due to the many novel and complex points of legal practice and theory which it entails. For example, although arbitration does not typically involve minors or legally incapable parties’ trusts do, and thus trust arbitration raises numerous due process and human rights concerns. Similarly, court supervision and enforcement of trusts is sometimes considered essential to the very nature of trusts and questions therefore arise concerning the extent to which arbitral tribunals could supplant courts in that regard. Another complication is that trusts are not contracts and questions therefore arise about how to bind individuals to a trust arbitration agreement, particularly as regards beneficiaries who may be unascertained, minor or legally incompetent at the time the trust was created. The aim of this thesis is to analyse and present potential solutions to these complications from an English law perspective, although other common law legal systems will be analysed where relevant

In this essay, we describe the overlapping phenomena of new legal hubs (NLHs), international commercial courts, and arbitral courts. We survey their impact on the law and geopolitics of international commercial dispute resolution, identifying key issues these new dispute resolution institutions raise. While the rise of international commercial courts spans authoritarian and liberal states, Western and Asian states, common law and civil law traditions, it also highlights and builds upon regional differences. We question the assumption that the establishment of new courts is always consistent with an increase in the rule of law, particularly in non-democratic states. We close with thoughts about the potential influence and future role of these institutions. Some of the procedural innovations discussed here may lead to shifts in international commercial dispute resolution for years to come, but the question of whether there is sufficient demand for these new institutions lingers.

ruit de la pratique anglo-saxonne, le financement de l’arbitrage par un tiers financeur connaît un essor significatif tant à l’échelle nationale qu’internationale. Intervenu en France ces dernières années, ce mécanisme permet à un tiers (fonds d’investissement, société de financement spécialisée…) de financer une partie ou la totalité des frais relatifs à une procédure arbitrale tels que les frais d’avocats, d’experts, de témoins, d’arbitres ainsi que ceux liés à l’exécution de la sentence arbitrale. En cas de succès, le tiers financeur perçoit en contrepartie un pourcentage sur les dommages et intérêts alloués par la sentence arbitrale à la partie financée . Bien que dans une large majorité des cas le tiers financeur intervienne en faveur de la partie demanderesse, il peut aussi intervenir en faveur du défendeur ayant formulé une demande reconventionnelle. Le tiers financeur assume seul les risques financiers liés à la procédure. Si la partie financée n’obtient pas gain de cause à l’issue de la procédure arbitrale, le tiers ne percevra donc aucune rémunération et ne sollicitera auprès de son client aucun remboursement des frais qu’il aura avancés pour lui.

- Virtual Arbitration Hearings in Times of COVID-19 (And Beyond); - International Arbitration and Blockchain: Current State, Types, Characteristics and the Future Perspective; - Use of Artificial Intelligence in Arbitration; - The Impact of Brexit on the Arbitration Procedure in Great Britain; - May Misapplication of EU Law Give Rise to International Responsibility of the Member State ... Under Investment Treaties? - International Investment Court System: The Future of Investment Dispute Settlement? - EU and Its New Mechanism for the ISDS in the Protection of FDI – What the Future Holds? - (Un)Clean Hands in International Investment Arbitration: Some Cleaning Required? - Challenges of Arbitrators in Inter-State Cases: A Different Cattle of Fish? - “Rules of Law” and Lex Mercatoria Determination Under the Auspice of ICC Arbitration; - Sources of Transnational Public Policy in International Commercial Arbitration; - Regulation of Arbitration Agreements Under New York Convention; - Comfortable Satisfaction Before the Court of Arbitration for Sport: Consistency Despite Differences? - Comparison of ICC Expert Report vs. ICC Arbitration Award; - Analysis of Civil Law Consequences of Corruption Under the Czech Law... in the Light of International Commercial Arbitration; - The Crime of Bending the Law From the Point of View of the Arbitrator ... of the Court of Arbitration and Application Practice; - The Arbitration Convention as One of the Measures to Eliminate Double Taxation ... in the European Union and in Slovak Republic; - Possibility of Resolving Individual Labor Disputes in Croatian Law by Arbitration; - What We Know, We Don’t Know About Macao’s Arbitration Framework and the Way Forward.

YK farklı sorunlar veya uyuşmazlıklarla yüzyüze gelebilir. Sorunlar veya uyuşmazlıklar kriz halini alarak YK'nın işleyişine olumsuz etki edebilmektedir. Kriz derinleştikçe, YK işlevini yerine getirmekte zorlanabilir. Krizin bir adım ötesinde ise YK kilitlenebilmektedir. Pay sahipleri arasındaki menfaat çatışmaları, YK kriz ve/veya kilitlenmesinin en sık rastlanan temel nedenidir. Kilitlenme durumunda, YK toplantı yapamamakta veya karar alamamaktadır. Oysa ki, YK her daim çalışabilmesi gereken bir organdır. YK'nın kilitlenmesi, şirketin de kilitlenmesi sonucu doğurabilir. Bu durum öyle risklidir ki, şirketin feshi/tasfiyesi yakın bir ihtimal olabilmektedir. Bu aşamada kilidin olabildiğince hızlı açılması şirketten menfaati olan herkes için (pay sahipleri, YK üyeleri, çalışanlar, alacaklılar, kamu vb.) hayati önemdedir. Bu nedenle, şirket esas sözleşmesinde YK kriz ve kilitlenmelerine karşı önlemler planlanmalıdır. Tek kişiden ibaret YK modeli ve YK'ya danışma kurulu desteği kilitleme riskine karşı önerdiğimiz modeldir. Pay sahipleri sözleşmesi, aile şirketleri için aile anayasası gibi hukuki metinler kriz ve/veya kilitlenmeye ilişkin tedbirler içermelidir. Önlemlere, rağmen kilitlenme gerçekleşir ise, öncelikle YK içi ve şirket içi çözümler uygulamaya konulmalıdır. Bu tür yöntemler yeterli olmazsa, AUÇY'nin tatbiki, şirket dışından gelen çözümün ilk aşaması olarak kabul edilmelidir. Arabuluculuk ile YK kriz ve kilitlenmelerine karşı etkin, hızlı ve kalıcı çözümler sağlanabilmektedir. "Med-arb" veya "Arb-med" gibi yöntemlerden de faydalanılabilir. Tahkim de bir çözüm yoludur. Bu yolda "seri tahkim usulü" YK kilitlenmeleri için daha uygundur. Son çare olarak nitelediğimiz, dava yolu ise, bazı durumlarda içinde şirketin fesih ve tasfiye riskini barındırdığı için kilidi açmak ve hatta kilidi kırmak için uygulamaya konulabilir. Mahkemelerde, organ yokluğuna dayalı fesih davası ve özellikle haklı sebeple şirketin feshi davası çözüm sağlayabilecek dava tipleridir. Özellikle, haklı sebeple şirketin feshi davası, kriz ve kilitlenmelere daha uygun olup, stratejik sonuçlara da imkân vermektedir. Bunlar yanında, YK işleyişinde yapay zekâdan faydalanmanın mümkün olup olmadığı, yapay zekâya YK üyesi olarak kişi statüsü verilip verilemeyeceği, bu meselenin YK üyelerinin sorumluluğuna etkisi incelenmiştir. Board of Directors may face various disputes or disagreements. These disputes or disagreements may turn into crises which negatively affect the normal functioning of the board. As the crisis deepens, Board of Directors could have difficulties in fulfilling its function. Moreover, a step further from the crisis, Board of Directors might even be locked up. Conflicts of interest among shareholders are known as the most common cause of the board of directors crisis and/or deadlock. In event of a deadlock, Board of Directors, a body should always be able to function, cannot hold meetings or make decisions anymore. The deadlock of board of directors, may lead the entire company to be locked down whereas the company may encounter the possibility of dissolution and liquidation. At this point, unlocking the crisis as quickly as possible is vital for relevant competent persons of the company. Therefore, measures should be taken in the company's articles of association against Board of Director crisis and/or deadlock. One-person Board of Directors model and support of Advisory Board to Board of Directors is the model we recommend against the risk of locking. Legal texts such as shareholder agreements and family constitutions for family companies should include measures regarding deadlock. If a deadlock has occurred in spite of precautions, first of all, Board of Directors and internal remedies should be implemented. If such methods are not sufficient enough, Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) methods should be regarded as the first stage of external intervention. Effective and rapid solutions can be achieved against deadlocks via mediation. "Med-arb" or "Arb-med" could be also utilised. Arbitration is also a way and in this way; "expedited (fast-track) arbitration" procedure is more suitable for corporate deadlocks. Litigation, as the last possibility that we propose, could also be applied to unlock or even break the lock, since it contains the risk of dissolution and liquidation of company in some cases. In courts, termination action based on the absence of organs and especially termination of the company with a valid reason are the types of cases that may provide a solution. Especially termination of the company with a valid reason is more suitable for crisis and deadlocks, and also grants strategic results. In addition to these, it has been questioned in this study whether Board of directors possibly benefit from artificial intelligence in the operations and whether AI can be attributed a person-status as a member of Board of Directors. The effects of this issue on the responsibility of the members of Board of Directors have been analysed.

“It is a curious fact that the Americanization of international arbitration is a topic that is often felt but is rarely discussed.” Roger P. Alford Similar to Alford’s sentiments, the shift towards arbitration in the United States alone is a phenomenon often felt, but feebly interrogated. Law schools across the nation continue to operate under the premise of judicial decision-making grounded in “rights protection.”[1] Yet, there is a clear shift towards arbitration as the preferred procedural process, with over 303,999 cases resolved by way of arbitration in 2019 alone.[2] While this brief note does not seek to interrogate the shift towards arbitration as much as it intends to examine the impact of American arbitration on international commercial arbitration generally, that shift, as you will see, looms in the background of any and all analysis of arbitration in the United States. I will begin by briefly noting the origins- and current regime of international commercial arbitration in the United States so to address the impact of its arbitration law and arbitral institutions on arbitration globally. I will then offer thoughts on the prospective evolution of international arbitration in the United States and how that may change the directions of legal procedural processes both in the United States and abroad. I. ORIGINS- AND CURRENT REGIME OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION IN THE USA As arbitration flourishes as the choice for commercial disputes, there is no doubt that the United States has become a newfound hub for arbitration. It was not always this way, however. The Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) of 1925 established a steady road to an increasingly pro-arbitration policy, in three chapters, that shows itself in case-law as: when in doubt, favor arbitration.[3] The first chapter of the FAA establishes the framework for arbitration seated in the U.S. and provides the grounds for enforceable arbitration agreements and awards, while the second and third chapters implement the 1958 New York Convention and 1975 Panama Conventions, respectively. The strictly pro-arbitration policy does not lack in its own confusion, however, because of its basis in an otherwise federalist system. The FAA has largely remained unchanged since its nascence and has thus, left a substantive amount of discretion in interpreting arbitration law in the United States to the Supreme Court. One such source of confusion in U.S. arbitration law due to a lack of amendment lies in the term “arbitrability.” Arbitrability is the susceptibility of a case to be resolved by way of arbitration. In order to define the parameters of this susceptibility, the Supreme Court has distinguished between “procedural” and “substantive” arbitrability, wherein the former concerns itself with “prerequisites such as time limits, notices, laches, estoppel, and other conditions” and the latter, with a court’s decision.[4] The benefits to arbitration remain unmatched for commercial entities, however, which inspires the aforementioned pro-arbitration policy despite any real judicial framework. Arbitration allows parties to customize their dispute resolution by choosing the venue, applicable procedural law, and an expert adjudicator who may be more familiar with the intricacies of the dispute, among other benefits. There is a commitment to secrecy that is not found in the common court and the single, binding, and final resolution of a dispute through arbitration is the precise source of criticism that inspires the flock towards arbitration. Without the federal rules of civil procedure that would otherwise govern litigation, arbitration is governed by the procedural rules that each side agrees upon. The FAA paved the way for case law in the United States that would eventually shape a stronger pro-arbitration policy than ever—counseling against “even the mildest interference by courts in the conduct of U.S.-seated arbitrations.”[5] II. THE IMPACT OF U.S. ARBITRATION LAW AND U.S. ARBITRAL INSTITUTIONS IN THE WORLD OF ARBITRATION Assessing the impact of U.S. arbitration law begins by assessing what characterizes U.S. law: civil procedure. The adversarial form of litigation in which procedural tools are employed by advocates to advance arguments in a distinct style distinguishes the United States from other countries—and this feature inevitably slipped, in some capacity, into global arbitral institutions. Because the Rules of Arbitration for the International Chamber of Commerce are so brief,[6] American lawyers had tremendous flexibility in bringing American trial procedures with them. This came specifically in the form of document production for discovery and cross-examinations “to confront adverse witnesses.”[7] Critics refer to these added procedures as costly in both time and expense, defining them as the source of the “Americanization” of arbitration. Yet, while there is truth to such criticism, it may be more accurate to acknowledge the incorporation of aspects of American trial procedure as one country’s influence on arbitration. Far from inheriting solely American practice, global arbitral institutions maintain classic procedural tools while assimilating facets of each major country’s influence on arbitration.[8] III. THE PROSPECTIVE EVOLUTION OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION IN THE USA Apart from being a source of revenue,[9] international arbitration is the natural response to the increase in “trade, investment, and supply-chain relationships” that hope to live free of potential biases from domestic fora.[10] The California Supreme Court may have briefly lost sight of this when deciding Birbrower, wherein attorneys not admitted to the bar of a certain state are not only ineligible to recover attorney’s fee but also, may be fined for unauthorizing practice of law.[11] Since Birbrower over two decades ago, however, the California Legislature unanimously passed Senate Bill 766. Under SB 766, non-California lawyers are able to represent parties in international arbitration proceedings in California, bringing California to the arbitration table. As home to Silicon Valley – and even aside from big technology, home to some of the largest companies in the world – California’s SB 766 will bring a swath of arbitration proceedings to its terrain. While California may certainly work in tandem with New York as the home to arbitration for technology and privacy concerns, reserving trade and investment disputes for New York, California may very well be the next major hub of arbitration. Already, it has received massive interest in being an arbitration destination. SB 766 will transform that interest into a revenue. It thus becomes all the more important, internationally, to understand and confront the ways in which the Americanization of arbitration would take place. [1] See, e.g. Thomas E. Carbonneau, Revolution in Law Through Arbitration, The Eighty-Fourth Cleveland-Marshall Fund Visiting Scholar Lecture, 56 Clev. St. L. Rev. 233, 233 n.3 (2008), available at https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev/vol56/iss2/3 (“judicial decision-making has shifted from rights protection to guaranteeing access to some form of adjudication. As a result, law and adjudication have become less sacramental.”) [2] See American Arbitration Association, Adr.Org, https://adr.org/ (last visited Dec. 28, 2019). [3] See, e.g., Moses H. Cone Memorial Hosp. v. Mercury Construction Corp., 460 U.S. 1, 24-25 (1983) (“[A]ny doubts concerning the scope of arbitrable issues should be resolved in favor of arbitration …”). [4] See Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 537 U.S. 79, 85 (2002) (distinguishing between “issues of substantive arbitrability [which] are for a court to decide and issues of procedural arbitrability, i.e., whether prerequisites such as time limits, notice, laches, estoppel, and other conditions precedent to an obligation to arbitrate have been met, [which] are for the arbitrators to decide.”) (citations omitted). [5] See Laurence Shore, Tai-Heng Cheng, Jenelle E. La Chuisa, Lawrence Schaner, and Mara V.J Senn, International Arbitration in the United States 1, 320 (2018). [6] George M. von Mehrem and Alana C. Jochum, Is International Arbitration Becoming Too American?, 2 Global Bus. L. Rev. 47, 51 (2011) available at https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/gblr/vol2/iss1/6. [7] Id. [8] Philip J. McConnaughay, Introduction to International Commercial Arbitration in Asia 1, xxix (2002). In support of his assertion, McConnaughay reports that from 1995 to 2000, China’s leading international arbitration commission, CIETAC, received 4,200 new international commercial arbitrations and the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC) received 1,394, totaling 5,594. Id. Note: interrogatories and depositions are not included. [9] See ICC (International Chamber of Commerce), ICC Arbitration Figures Reveal New Record for Awards in 2018, https://iccwbo.org/media-wall/news-speeches/icc-arbitration-figures-reveal-new-record-cases-awards-2018/. [10] Daily Journal, International Arbitration Finally Comes to California, Howard B. Miller, https://www.dailyjournal.com/mcle/330-international-arbitration-finally-comes-to-california. [11] See generally, Birbrower, Montalbano, Condon & Frank v. Superior Court, 17 Cal. 4th 119 (1998).

根据传统仲裁理论以及国际主流观点，仲裁裁决一经仲裁地法院撤销即已宣告该裁决“死亡”，因而也无法获得执行地国法院的承认和执行。但是随着全球化的纵深发展，衍生出了一系列国际商事仲裁的新理念、新理论和新动态，如意思自治在国际私法领域的扩张及国际商事仲裁裁决理论的更新等，进而导致已被撤销的仲裁裁决重获新生。但是由于该现象依然处于缓慢演进状态且各国国情差异较大，故而在“复活”规则方面缺乏统一的适用标准，致使现行的国际商事仲裁执行秩序的稳定性和一致性受到干扰。针对此问题，本文在分析已被撤销的仲裁裁决“复活”法律依据的基础上，从国际法层面和国内法层面提出相应的完善规则。 According to the traditional arbitration theory and the international mainstream view, once the ar-bitration award is revoked by the court of the place of arbitration, the award is declared “dead” and therefore cannot be recognized and enforced by the court of the country where the arbitration is executed. However, with the deepening development of globalization, a series of new ideas, new theories and new trends of international commercial arbitration have been derived, such as the expansion of autonomy of will in the field of private international law and the update of the arbitra-tion theory of international commercial arbitration, which leads to the rebirth of the arbitration awards that have been cancelled. However, because the phenomenon is still in a slow evolution state and the national conditions of different countries are large, there is a lack of uniform applica-ble standards in the “resurrection” rule, which interferes with the stability and consistency of the current international commercial arbitration execution order. In view of this problem, this paper, based on the analysis of the legal basis of the “resurrection” of the cancelled arbitral award, puts forward the corresponding perfect rules from the international law and domestic law.

"Les centres d’arbitrage maritime." Résumé : Le sujet des centres d'arbitrage maritime concerne le processus de résolution des contentieux maritimes quand leurs parties optent pour soumettre leur différend à des instances d'arbitrage comme voie alternative. Les centres d'arbitrage maritime appliquent le règlement arbitral et ses règles dans le cas où le choix est fait en fonction de la clause compromissoire qui inclut ce choix ainsi que la loi applicable. Lacompétence de cet instance d'arbitrage convenue débute à la date de la soumission de la demande d'arbitrage, afin de lui confier le suivi des procédures d'arbitrage et de tout ce qui touche au litige arbitral et jusqu' à ce que la sentence (décision) arbitrale soit rendue. "Maritime arbitration centers." Summary: The subject of maritime arbitration centers concerns the process of resolving maritime disputes when their parties opt to submit their dispute to the arbitral tribunal as an alternative solution, and maritime arbitration centers apply arbitration regulations and its rules in case where the choice is made according to the arbitration clause which includes this choice as well as applying the law on all disputes. The arbitral tribunal function starts from the date of submitting the arbitration request to it to be entrusted with following up the arbitration procedures and everything related to the arbitration dispute and until the arbitral award is issued. : الملخص يتعلق موضوع مراكز التحكيم البحري بعملية فض المنازعات البحرية التي يختار أطرافها عرض النزاع على هيئات التحكيم كطريق بديل، و مراكز التحكيم البحري تعمل على تطبيق لوائح التحكيم و نظامها التحكيمي في حال وقوع الاختيار عليها وفقا لشرط التحكيم الذي يتضمن هذا الاختيار، إلى جانب القانون الواجب التطبيق على النزاع. و يبدأ اختصاص هذه الهيئة في التحكيم المؤسسي من تاريخ تقديم طلب التحكيم إليها، ليوكل لها متابعة إجراءات التحكيم و كل ما يتعلق بالمنازعة التحكيمية و إلى غاية صدور الحكم التحكيمي.

رقابة القضاء على أعمال المحكمين من بين أوجه الرقابة التي أقرتها التشريعات الحديثة وقوانين التحكيم الوطنية و الإتفاقيات الدولية وكذا نظام التحكيم في ظل تطور الثقافة التحكيمية في الوقت الراهن. كما تعد ضمانا وحماية للمصالح وحقوق الأفراد والشركات التجارية من جهة وتُمكن القضاء من السيطرة على تصرفات المحكمين وحماية شخصهم في الدعوى التحكيمية لتحقيق فاعلية نظام التحكيم من جهة ثانية. Le contrôle des actes des arbitres est établi par les législations récentes et par la législation arbitrale nationale, ainsi que par les conventions internationales en la matière. Il participe à l’évolution de la culture arbitrale et constitue une garantie et une protection des intérêts des individus et des sociétés commerciales. Il permet d’avoir une vue sur les travaux des arbitres d’une part, et sur leur protection d’autre part, pour assurer l’efficacité de l’arbitrage. The review of the acts of the arbitrators shall be established by recent laws and national arbitral legislation and international conventions on the subject. It contributes to the evolution of the arbitral culture and constitutes a guarantee and protection of the interests of individuals and commercial company’s .It allows having a view on the work of the arbitrators on the one hand, and on their protection to ensure the effectiveness of arbitration

Sovereign rights in Exclusive economic zones and Continental shelves are functionally limited to the economic exploitation of these zones. Moreover, in the case of disputed maritime zones these sovereign rights are neither exclusive nor necessarily constant. Nevertheless, states are still expected to provide the investments established in these zones the same treatment they should provide in their territories where they exercise full and constant sovereignty. If a host state agrees to the establishment of an investment in a maritime zone that become later contested, do the occurrence of the contestation and the hazards arising from such contestation relief the host state from its contractual and treaty obligations toward the investment by virtue of the force majeure concept. This paper argues that a traditional interpretation of the force majeure concept in respect of investment agreements and contracts, hampers states ability to de-escalate their maritime disputes, diminishes its capacity to conclude delimitation agreements and reduces the promotion of the UNCLOS III as well as its mechanisms for disputes settlement. It proposes a contextualist interpretation of the force majeure concept that is adapted to the exploitation of disputed maritime zones and states obligations under the international law of the sea. First, it examines the concept of force majeure as a doc-trinal hypothesis and its applications in international contracts and international in-vestment agreements. Second, it analyzes the legal act of maritime contestation as a force majeure event according to the possible interpretations of the concept of “force majeure”. Finally, it examines the recurrent legal implications susceptible of arising out of a contestation; provisional orders and unfavorable delimitation and their qualifica-tion as a force majeure event in the realm of investment agreements and contract.