Bibliographie sélective OHADA

Sigorta ettiren genellikle geleceğe etkili olarak sigorta korumasından yararlanmak üzere sigorta sözleşmesi yapmaktadır. Ancak sigorta ettiren, sözleşmenin kurulmasına ilişkin öneri ile sözleşmenin kurulması arasında veya sözleşmeye ilişkin önerinin yapıldığı tarihinden önce sigorta korumasından yararlanmak isteyebilir. Sigorta ettirenin sözleşmenin kurulmasından önce sigorta korumasından yararlanabilmesi, geçmişe etkili sigorta ile mümkün olmaktadır. Geçmişe etkili sigorta TTK m. 1458 hükmünde düzenlenmiştir. Geçmişe etkili sigorta sözleşmesinin kurulabilmesi için ikisi olumlu bir tanesi olumsuz şart olarak üç şartın bulunması gereklidir. Olumlu şartlar, sigorta sözleşmesine ilişkin mutabakatın bulunması ve sigorta sözleşmesinin kurulması; olumsuz şart ise, sigortacı, sigorta ettiren ve sözleşmeden haberdar olmak şartıyla sigortalının rizikoya ilişkin bilgi sahibi olmamasıdır. Bu şartların sağlanması hâlinde, geçmişe etkili sigorta sözleşmesi geçerli olacak ve böylelikle sigorta koruması, sigorta sözleşmesinin kurulduğu tarihten önce başlayacaktır. Geçmişe etkili sigorta gerçek ve gerçek olmayan geçmişe etkili sigorta olarak ikiye ayrılmaktadır. Gerçek geçmişe etkili sigorta, sigorta korumasının sözleşmenin kurulmasına ilişkin önerinin yapıldığı tarihten önce başladığı sigortadır. Gerçek ol-mayan geçmişe etkili sigorta ise, sigorta ettirenin sözleşmeye ilişkin öneride bulun-duğu tarih ile sözleşmenin şekli olarak kurulduğu tarih arasında sigorta korumasının sağlandığı sigorta olarak isimlendirilmektedir. Nitekim TTK m. 1458 düzenlemesinin ilk cümlesinde de, sigorta korumasının "sözleşmenin yapılmasından önceki bir tarihten itibaren" sağlanabileceği belirtilerek, gerçek veya gerçek olmayan geçmişe etkili sigortanın yapılmasının mümkün olduğu anlaşılmaktadır. The insured generally makes an insurance contract in order to benefit from insurance protection effectively for the future. However, the policyholder may wish to benefit from insurance protection between the proposal for the conclusion of the contract and the conclusion of the contract or before the date of the proposal regarding the contract. It is possible for the insurant to benefit from insurance protection before the conclusion of the contract, with retroactive insurance. Retroactive insurance TCC m. It was regulated in the 1458 provision. In order for a retroactive insurance contract to be established, three conditions must be present, two of which are positive and one is negative. Positive terms, agreement on the insurance contract and establishment of the insurance contract; The negative condition is that the insurer, the policyholder and the insured are not informed about the risk, provided that they are aware of the contract. If these conditions are met, the retroactive insurance contract will be valid and thus insurance protection will start before the insurance contract is established. Retroactive insurance is divided into two as real and unreal retroactive insurance. Actual retroactive insurance is insurance in which insurance protection begins before the date of the proposal for the establishment of the contract. Unreal, retroactive insurance, on the other hand, is called insurance in which insurance protection is provided between the date the policyholder makes a proposal regarding the contract and the date the contract is formally established. As a matter of fact, TTK art. In the first sentence of regulation 1458, it is understood that it is possible to make real or non-real retroactive insurance, by stating that insurance protection can be provided "from a date before the conclusion of the contract".

近年来，争端解决的数字化转型和人工智能的全面应用一直是国际仲裁界热烈讨论的话题。学者和仲裁 从业者普遍关注人工智能技术具体如何在仲裁程序中使用，以及从司法角度，人工智能技术的运用可能 对仲裁程序乃至法律制度产生什么潜在影响。作为一项新技术，人工智能对仲裁领域的总体影响是向好 发展的。首先，人工智能将提高立案、庭审、裁决和执行各个环节的效率，降低人力、时间和经济成本， 促进仲裁向新的市场领域扩展，并改善客户的满意度。当然，新技术的兴起与传播将不可避免地改变旧 有机制，出现一些意料之外的问题。探索人工智能技术对仲裁机构的影响，即是要从技术的“双面性” 出发，衡量人工智能在仲裁中的运用可能带来的增益和风险。 In recent years, the digital transformation of dispute resolution and the overall application of ar tificial intelligence have been the subject of lively discussion in the international arbitration com munity. Scholars and arbitration practitioners have generally focused on how AI technology spe cifically can be used in arbitration proceedings and what potential impact the use of AI technology may have on arbitration proceedings and even the legal system from a judicial perspective. As a new technology, the overall impact of AI on the field of arbitration is a positive development. First, AI will improve efficiency in all aspects of filing, hearing, adjudication and enforcement, reduce human, time and economic costs, facilitate the expansion of arbitration into new market segments, and improve customer satisfaction. Of course, the rise and spread of new technologies will inevit ably change old mechanisms and create some unanticipated problems. Exploring the impact of AI technology on arbitral institutions is a matter of weighing the potential gains and risks associated with the use of AI in arbitration in light of the “double-sided” nature of the technology.

يعتبر الفنان العازف أو المؤدي، الطائفة الوحيدة من أصحاب الحقوق المجاورة التي تتمتع بحقوق معنوية ومالية على أعماله. فالطابع الإبداعي الذي يكتسيه أداؤه يبرز شخصيته الأدبية والفنية، على خلاف أعمال أصحاب الحقوق المجاورة التي تتسم بالطابع الصناعي اولمادي. يتضمن الحق المعنوي جملة من الصلاحيات تمكن الفنان من الاستفادة من أعماله وحمايتها من مختلف أنواع الاعتداء. غير أنها وإن كانت تتشابه في البعض منها مع الحقوق المخولة للمؤلف لحماية مصنفات ه وشخصه، إلا أنها تختلف معها في البعض منها لاسيما الحق في تقرير النشر، والحق في السحب أو الندم، باعتبار أن التشريعات الوطنية الخاصة بالحقوق المجاورة والتي اعترف ت للفنان التمتّع بحق معنوي ، جاءت خالية من الإشارة إلى ذلك. لذا كان من الضروري تحديد مدى تمتع الفنان العازف بهذين الحقين، أمام الف ا رغ القانوني الذي أدى إلى مجادلات فقهية وتضا رب في الأحكام القضائية. L'artiste interprète ou exécutant est le seul des titulaires de droits voisins à bénéficier d’un droit moral et d’un droit patrimonial sur son interprétation. Le caractère original de sa prestation met en valeur sa personnalité littéraire et artistique, à l’inverse des oeuvres des titulaires de droits voisins qui se caractérisent par leur aspect industriel et matériel. Le droit moral dont dispose l'artiste-interprète, comprend un ensemble de prérogatives qui lui permettent de bénéficier de ses oeuvres et de les protéger contre les divers abus. Cependant, et bien qu’elles soient similaires, pour certaines d’entre elles, aux droits octroyés à l’auteur pour protéger son oeuvre et sa personne, elles se différencient de certains d’entre eux, en particulier le droit de divulgation et le droit de retrait ou de repentir, du fait que les législations nationales relatives aux droits voisins qui reconnaissent à l'artiste la jouissance d’un droit moral, sont dépourvues de toute référence à ce sujet. Dès lors, il était nécessaire de déterminer dans quelle mesure l'artiste-interprète jouit de ses deux droits, face au vide juridique qui a donné lieu à des controverses doctrinales et à des décisions de justice contradictoires. The artist, musician or performer, is the only one of the holders of related rights to benefit from a moral right and financial rights over his performance. The original character of his performance highlights his literary and artistic personality, unlike the works of holders of neighboring rights which are characterized by their industrial and material aspect. The moral rights available to the performer include a set of prerogatives that allow them to benefit from their works and protect them against various abuses. However, and although they are similar, for some of them, to the rights granted to the author to protect his work and his person, they are different from some of them, in particular the right of disclosure and the right of withdrawal or of repentance, due to the fact that national laws relating to neighboring rights which recognize the artist's enjoyment of a moral right, are devoid of any reference to this subject, Therefore, it was necessary to determine to what extent the performer enjoys both rights, in the face of the legal vacuum which has given rise to doctrinal controversies and contradictory court decisions.

إن كان التحكيم طريقا بديلا للقضاء في حسم المنازعات، فإن عملية التحكيم تحتاج لكي تكتمل أسباب فاعليتها وانفاذ أحكامها لتدخل قضاء الدولة باعتباره سلطة عامة، تملك قوة إل ا زم الخصوم بتنفيذ أحكام المحكمين. ومن باب المفارقة، أن هذه الرقابة القضائية على أحكام التحكيم، تؤدي إلى إقحام القاضي الوطني في ن ا زع، أستبعد منه مسبقا بإ ا ردة المتنازعين، إلا أن المفارقة ظاهرية، حيث أن دور القاضي يبقى منحص ا ر في رقابة مدى مطابقة الحكم التحكيميي لمبادئ أساسية، أتت على سبيل الحصر، دون أن يكون له فحص وقائع وموضوع الن ا زع. غير أن تحديد سلطة القاضي لي س مطلقة، فبناء على المقاربة الجديدة المبنية على نوع المصالح المطلوب حمايتها، كمعيار لتحديد درجة وشدة الرقابة المسلطة على حكم لتحكيم، يستطيع هذا الأخير، تعديل رقابته بين مشددة ومخففة . وعلى هذا الأساس، فإن غالبية القضاءات العربية تبنت موقفا وسطيا بين مذهبي التوسع والتضييق من نطاق رقابة المحاكم على حكم التحكيم الدولي، تماشيا مع متطلبات التجارة الدولية ومقتضيات مصالحها الوطنية . If arbitration is an alternative means of resolving disputes, the arbitration process needs, for the reasons of its effectiveness and the application of its provisions, the intervention of the judicial power of the State, in order to oblige the parties to carry out the arbitral awards. Paradoxically, this judicial review of arbitral awards leads to involving the national judge in a dispute, which was previously excluded by the will of the parties in dispute. However, this paradox is apparent, because the role of the national judge remains limited to the strict control of the compliance of the arbitration award with the basic principles enacted in an exclusive manner, without having to examine the facts and the subject of the dispute. However, this limitation of judicial power is not absolute, because on the basis of the new approach, based on the type of interests to be protected, as the criterion for determining the extent of the control exercised over an arbitral award, the latter can modulate its control between strict and attenuating. On this basis, the majority of Arab jurisdictions have adopted a middle position between the two tendencies, so-called maximalist control, and minimalist tendency of the jurisdictions' control over the international arbitration award, in accordance with the needs of international trade and the requirements of their interests. Si l'arbitrage est un moyen alternatif pour de résoudre les différends, le processus d'arbitrage a besoin, pour les raisons de son efficacité et l'application de ses dispositions de l'intervention du pouvoir judiciaire de l'État, afin d'obliger les parties d'exécuter les sentences arbitrales. Paradoxalement, ce contrôle judiciaire sur les sentences arbitrales conduit à impliquer le juge national dans un litige, qui en était auparavant exclu par la volonté des parties en litige. Toutefois, ce paradoxe est apparent, car le rôle du juge national reste limité au strict contrôle de la conformité la sentence arbitrale aux principes de base édicté d’une manière exclusive, sans avoir à examiner les faits et l'objet du litige. Cependant, cette limitation de pouvoir juge n'est pas absolue, car sur la base de la nouvelle approche, fondée sur le type d'intérêts à protéger, comme critère de détermination de l'étendue du contrôle exercé sur une sentence arbitrale, ce dernier peut moduler son contrôle entre strict et atténuant. Sur cette base, la majorité des juridictions arabes ont adopté une position médiane entre les deux tendances, contrôle dite maximaliste, et tendance minimaliste du contrôle des juridictions sur la sentence d'arbitrage international, conformément aux besoins du commerce international et aux exigences de leurs intérêts.