Bibliographie sélective OHADA

L’avènement d’une procédure collective conduit très souvent à envisager la cession des éléments de l’entreprise parmi lesquels les contrats qui en sont les piliers. Le droit français, conscient de l’importance des contrats autorise leur cession autoritaire en vue de favoriser le redressement et ce au détriment de la relativité chère à toute convention. Cette résolution ne fut pas celle du droit OHADA qui soucieux de respecter les principes contractuels n’envisage la cession des contrats que dans un cadre conventionnel. Pourtant, la cession purement conventionnelle n’est pas la solution la plus profitable car les créanciers de l’entreprise peuvent s’opposer sans fondement à la cession de leur contrat dans le but d’entraver le redressement de l’entreprise. C’est la raison pour laquelle il serait judicieux d’envisager une cession judiciaire aménagée conciliant le respect du contrat et l’objectif du redressement. The advent of a collective procedure leads very often to envisage the transfer of the elements of the company among which the contracts which are pillars. The French law, conscious of the importance of contracts, authorizes their authoritarian transfer to facilitate the recovery of the company and it to the detriment of the relativity important to any agreement. This resolution was not the one of the OHBLA law which in order to respect the contractual principles, envisages the transfer of the contracts only throught a convention. Nevertheless, the purely conventional transfer is not the most profitable solution because the creditors of the company can oppose unfounded in the transfer of their contract with the aim of hindering the recovery of the company. It is the reason for which it would be sensible to envisage a judicial transfer fitted out reconciling the respect for the contract and the objective of the recovery.

Le droit du travail ivoirien n’est d’aucune originalité. Le propos peut paraître, à bien des égards, excessif. Pourtant, si l’on s’en tient aux règles, il mérite considération. Leur mode de production est connu et n’a pas changé depuis l’indépendance : un « copier coller » du droit français donnant ainsi naissance à un apatride juridique qu’aucun des systèmes juridiques impliqués ne revendique. L’ineffectivité particulière des règles ainsi produites, la souveraineté législative, l’effritement formel de la logique des blocs et la mondialisation invitent à un abandon de cette approche méthodologique, encline de paternalisme, au profit de l’audace et du pluralisme juridique. Labour law of the Ivory Coast is of no originality. Even if the words can appear for many reasons extreme, it deserves consideration. Their mode of production is known and did not change since independence: one "cut and paste" of French Law giving birth then on a juridical stateless which none of the implicated juridical systems claims. The particular ineffectiveness of such produced rules, legislative sovereignty, the definite crumbling of the logic of blocks and globalization invite to a rejection of this methodological, disposed approach of paternalism, to the advantage of boldness and to juridical pluralism.

Global ticaret hayatı her geçen gün genişlemekte ve global ekonomik pazarlar tarafından şekillendirilen global bir hukuk kültürü gelişmektedir. Bu yeni hukuk kültürünün bir parçası da, uluslararası ticaret hukuku alanında maddi hukukun yeknesaklaştırılmasıdır. Değişik uluslararası (a-nasyonal) hukuk kaynakları milletlerarası alanda faaliyet gösteren tacirlerin kullanımına sunulmuştur.Bu uluslararası hukuk kaynaklarına en güzel örneklerden biri Unidroit Prensipleri'dir. Uluslararası ticaret söz konusu olduğunda, farklı hukuk sistemlerinin uyuşmazlık halinde uygulanması belirsizliğe ve süprizlere yol açabilmektedir. Unidroit Prensipleri gibi yeknesak ve önceden belirlenen bir düzenlemenin uyuşmazlığın çözümünde uygulanması bu olumsuzluğu ortadan kaldırabilecek; tarafsız bir hukukun uygulanmasına imkan tanıyacaktır.Çalışma, üç bölümden oluşmaktadır. İlk bölümde, ?uluslararası ticari sözleşme? kavramı ve bunlara uygulanacak hukukun yeknesaklaştırılması çabaları bazı örnekler ile incelenmiştir.İkinci bölümde Unidroit Prensipleri'nin içeriği genel olarak açıklanmıştır. Unidroit Prensipleri'ne ilişkin açıklamalarımız, Prensipler'in düzenlediği hususlarla sınırlı kalmıştır.Üçüncü bölümde, tarafların Unidroit Prensipleri'ni uygulanacak hukuk olarak belirlemiş olmaları hali, Unidroit Prensipleri'nde yer alan tüm ya da bazı hükümleri sözleşmelerine almış olmaları hali, uygulanacak hukuk olarak lex mercatoria ya da hukukun genel prensiplerinin seçilmiş olması hali ve tarafların herhangi bir hukuk seçimi yapmamış olmaları halinde Unidroit Prensipleri'nin sözleşmeye uygulanma ihtimali ele alınmıştır. Bu meseleler, mahkeme ve tahkim yargılamaları bakımından ayrı ayrı incelenmiştir. Prensipler, uluslararası ticaret alanında ve özellikle uluslararası tahkim uygulamasında kullanılmakta ve yabancı doktrinde kullanılmasının yaygınlaşmasını savunanların sayısı artmaktadır. Bu gelişmelerin gerisinde kalmamak ve Türk ticaret ve hukuk alanında da bunları tanıtmak bu çalışmanın ana amacını oluşturmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, Prensipler'in Türk hukuku bakımından sözleşmeye uygulanacak hukuk olarak uygulanabilirliği ele alınmış ve Prensipler'in uluslararası ticari uyuşmazlıkların çözümünde yaygınlaşması desteklenmiştir. The global commercial activity expands and a new global law culture shaped by the global economic markets develops. A part of this new law culture is the unification of substantial law in the field of international commercial law. Various international (a-national) sources of law are presented to the usage of the international merchants.One of the best examples of these unified international sources of law is the Unidroit Principles. The application of different laws to the international commercial disputes causes uncertainty and suprises for the parties. The application of a unified and pre-determined rules such as the Unidroit Principles prevents such disadvantage and a neutral law may be applied to the resolution of the disputes.This study comprises of three chapters. The concept of ?international commercial contract? has been explained and some examples to the efforts of unification of substantial law have been outlined in the first chapter.The content of the Unidroit Principles has been explained in general in the second chapter. These general explanations are limited with the issues provided by the Principles.In the third chapter, the application of the Unidroit Principles to the disputes arising out of international commercial contracts in the cases of choice of Unidroit Principles as the applicable law to their contract by the parties, the inclusion of Unidroit Principles to the contracts by way of incorporation, choice of lex mercatoria or the general principles of law as the applicable law to their contract by the parties and the case when there is no choice of law by the parties have been explained. These explanations are separate for international arbitration and domestic courts.The Principles are being used in international commercial law, especially in the field of international arbitration, and the opponents of expansion of its usage are increasing in the international doctrine. The main objective of this study is not to fall beyond these developments and to introduce the Unidroit Principles to Turkish merchants and lawyers. The application of the Principles as the law applicable to contracts in Turkish law has been reviewed in this study and widening of their application in the resolution of international commercial disputes has been supported.

The model required to drive socio-economic development in Africa, and the relationship between the state and the private sector based on that model, have sparked much controversy among African analysts. Some question the relevance of other successful models of development, such as in the liberal West or in East-Asia, to the African context. Others criticise all models of development that are “alien” to African cultures and conditions hence rejecting the NEPAD model on this basis. This paper argues that although NEPAD does not present a detailed model of the relationship between the state, the private sector and civil society in Africa, some of its theoretical underpinnings suggest a balanced framework that should prompt African scholars to search for new models that do not necessarily imitate already successful ones but respect the particularities of each African state

Un article de la revue Revue du notariat, diffusée par la plateforme Érudit.