Bibliographie sélective OHADA

Le Code civil égyptien connaît depuis sa promulgation en 1949 la révision pour imprévision. Le texte est rédigé en termes limpides et a fait l’objet de maints arrêts de la Cour de cassation. Un demi-siècle plus tard, le droit d’auteur a consacré cette question dans un texte dont les termes ambigus confondent lésion et imprévision et auquel la jurisprudence reste réticente. Cette étude essaie d’aborder l’imprévision en droit commun et son articulation avec le droit d’auteur, une telle articulation pouvant révéler la nécessité d’une réforme du texte spécial. The Egyptian Civil Code, since its enactment in 1949, recognizes the revision for unpredictability. The text is written in clear terms and it is the subject of numerous decisions of the Court of Cassation. Half a century later, copyright law has enshrined this issue in a statute whose ambiguous terms confuse substantive inequality and impracticability of contract caused by un event unpredictable and to which case law remains reluctant. This study tries to shed the lights on the unpredictability in civil law and its articulation with copyright. Such an articulation could reveal the need for a reform of the special text.

A Integração Tripartida entre Comunidade de Desenvolvimento da África Austral (SADC), Comunidade da África Oriental (EAC) e Mercado Comum de África Oriental e Austral (COMESA) é uma inciativa de Chefes de Estado e de Governos das três Comunidades Económicas Regionais (CERs) em integrar seus separados programas numa única área de livre comércio. A iniciativa enquadra-se no contexto do Plano de Acção de Lagos (1980) e do Tratado de Abuja (1991) que consideram as CERs como pilares para criação da Comunidade Económica Africana (CEA). A Tese tem como principal objectivo analisar os desafios da cooperação intra-regional e perspectivas da integração tripartida entre SADC-EACCOMESA. Com base na pesquisa qualitativa coadjuvada pelas técnicas documental e bibliográfica constatou-se que a construção dos processos de integração regional na SADC e EAC evoluiram de padrões de confrontação para cooperação enquanto a COMESA foi por excelência um espaço priviligiado para cooperação comercial. Ainda assim, as três CERs enfrentam mesmos desafios relacionados com a sobreposição dos Estados membros, proliferação de “esquemas informais” de integração regional, dependência das CERs em relação aos doadoers internacionais, fragmentação de mercados nacional e regional e a prevalência da vontade de Estados membros sobre processos de integração regional. Face a estes desafios, a implementação da integração tripartida gera dúvidas e incertezas.

Although integrated reporting emphasizes the contemporaneous relationship between financial and non-financial capitals, its primary purpose is to explain how an organization creates value over time. This is similar to the purpose of management commentary, which is part of a general-purpose financial report. We compare and contrast the information requirements of an integrated report with the type of information that supplements the primary financial information in general purpose financial reports, prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). We examine whether the information in those reports is intended to be forward-looking and predictive, whether non-financial capitals can (and should) be monetized in order to facilitate integration, and whether the reporting boundary should be drawn in different ways to serve different purposes. We find that the International Integrated Reporting Framework and IFRS do not serve different purposes or apply different approaches, but that – in essence – they are competing frameworks. While IFRS has highly developed standards for reporting financial capital, neither has a well-developed approach for reporting any other capital.

Le droit originaire du traité de l’Organisation pour l’harmonisation en Afrique du droit des affaires (OHADA), applicable au sein des sociétés africaines de cet espace, manifeste actuellement des pesanteurs liées à son enracinement culturel non africain. En effet, les sociétés africaines signataires dudit traité ont décidé en 1993 d’élaborer un droit commun des affaires simple, moderne et adapté pour faciliter le développement de leurs économies. Elles ont, à ce jour, adopté dix actes uniformes qui régulent certains domaines des affaires en vue de réaliser la croissance économique prévue dans le traité. Cependant, la démarche empruntée à cet effet est confuse. D’une part, l’option pour l’uniformisation, au mépris de l’harmonisation attendue des phénomènes culturels africains, et, d’autre part, la transposition dans les sociétés africaines des modèles juridiques occidentaux, notamment les pratiques du droit international, amènent à douter de l’inspiration africaine du droit de l’OHADA. Un quart de siècle après, son bilan n’est pas flatteur et ne permet pas de préjuger de la satisfaction des objectifs du traité. En outre, la révision du traité à Québec en 2008 pour un meilleur ancrage culturel africain de ses normes révèle indubitablement l’intérêt d’asseoir l’essence culturelle du droit.

Les questions liées aux difficultés d’accès au logement et à la propriété sont plus que jamais d’actualité. Parmi les solutions proposées pour pallier ces difficultés, François Frenette, professeur émérite de la Faculté de droit de l’Université Laval à Québec, a élaboré un modèle de coopérative qui concilie les fondements individualistes de la propriété du droit privé québécois et les fondements communautaires des mouvements coopératifs, et ce, en offrant un accès à un type de propriété privée où les libertés du propriétaire seraient encadrées par une communauté donnée. Tentant d’explorer les contours de cette conciliation, l’auteur présente une légère immersion dans ce modèle proposé par le professeur Frenette, suivie d’une analyse sommaire utilisant ultimement la métaphore d’un « cerbère juridique » pour illustrer les interactions entre les institutions du droit privé québécois utilisés dans ce modèle et la volonté d’une communauté donnée de protéger la vocation sociale d’un immeuble.

ukuk davaları yaygın şekilde mahkemeden istenen hukuk himayeye göre bir sınıflandırılmaya tabi tutulmaktadır. Kişiler arasında geçerli olarak kurulan bir hukuki ilişkiyi bertaraf ederek yeni bir hukuki durum tesis eden davalar inşai davalar, bu davaların kabulü üzerine verilen mahkeme kararları ise inşai hükümler olarak adlandırılır. İnşai hükümler o zamana kadar var olmayan, ancak hükmün kesinleşmesiyle birlikte ortaya çıkan bir yeni bir hukuki durum yaratırlar. Kural olarak inşai hükümler herkese karşı etkilidir ve istenilen etkiyi doğurmak için icraya ya da herhangi bir aracıya ihtiyaç duymazlar. Özel hukuk alanında inşai davalar aile hukuku ve ticaret hukukunda yoğunlaşmakla birlikte, usul hukuk ve takip hukuk alanında inşai dava örnekleri de bulunmaktadır. Keza çekişmeli yargıda olduğu kadar çekişmesiz yargı işlerinde, geçici hukuki koruma tedbirleri görünümünde de inşai sonuç doğuran mahkeme kararlarına rastlanır. Bu tezde inşai hükümle ilgili temel kavramlar ele alındıktan sonra inşai hükmün özellikleri, türleri ve hükmün inşai etkisi başlıkları ayrıntılı bir şekilde ele alınacak; problemli gördüğümüz hususlarla ilgili kişisel önerilerde bulunulacaktır. Civil lawsuits are commonly subject to a classification according to the legal protection required from the court. Lawsuits which establish a new legal situation by eliminating a legal relationship established between individuals, are called constitutive lawsuits, and court verdicts made upon the acceptance of these lawsuits are called constitutive judgments. The constitutive judgments create a new legal situation that did not exist until then, but emerged with the finalization of the judgment. Likewise, as a rule, constitutive judgments are inter omnes effective against everyone and do not require execution or any means to produce the desired effect. In the field of private law, constitutive lawsuits are concentrated mostly in family law and commercial law, but there are also examples of constitutive lawsuits in the field of procedural law and law of execution. Moreover, in the area of non - contentious jurisdiction and temporary legal protections, constitutive court decisions are also exist. After considering the basic concepts related to the constitutive judgments, the features, the types and the titles of the constitutive judgments will be discussed in detail in our dissertation. Later on personal suggestions will be made on issues we consider problematic.