Bibliographie sélective OHADA

The thesis covers one of the investment standards of international investment law, namely the full protection and security standard. In Part I, the study is introduced in terms of structure and substance. Chapter 1 provides a description of the scope of the research topic and a definition of its terms and structure. Chapter 2 covers the historical development of the full protection and security standard. Part II deals with three fundamental issues concerning the standard: sources, interpretation and content. Chapter 3 contains a discussion dealing with the various sources of the standard. Each source will be studied independently. Chapter 4 will address general issues with regard to interpretation, such as to what extent the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties influences the process of interpretation. Chapter 5 deals with the content of the standard of full protection and security, including conceptual issues relating to the substantive elements of which the standard consists. Moreover, the chapter will ask questions as to which underlying issues are needed to explore when a due diligence assessment is made in order to determine whether a state has fulfilled its obligations to provide protection and security. Part III deals with issues relating to the violations of the standard. In Chapter 6, the violations of the standard and their many manifestations will be analyzed. The chapter will address whether certain fact-based scenarios can be established in which the standard is most commonly violated. Finally, Chapter 7 contains a summary of findings.

Le développement du droit communautaire en Afrique de l’Ouest couvre aujourd’hui un large champ qui s’étend aux investissements demeurés au lendemain des indépendances des États africains dans le périmètre de leur souveraineté. Les enjeux actuels du droit international des investissements, en raison des exigences de la mondialisation des économies, ont contraint les États de l’espace CEDEAO et UEMOA, importateurs de capitaux, à faire converger leur réglementation des investissements afin de favoriser leur attractivité et d’en tirer le meilleur parti. La difficulté d’un tel objectif réside dans la nécessité d’arriver à concilier leurs intérêts avec ceux des investisseurs, qui ne sont pas toujours convergents. The development of community law in West Africa nowadays covers a wide field extending to investments which, in the aftermath of independence, remained within the scope of sovereignty of African states. The current challenges of international investment law, because of the requirements of economic globalisation, have compelled ECOWAS and WAEMU countries, as importers of capital, to ensure convergence of their investment regulations so as to make them more attractive and to get the most out of them. The difficulty of such an objective lies in the need to successfully reconcile their interests with those of investors, which do not always converge.

Infrastructure is one of the main parameters of economic growth and a country‘s competitiveness depends on the provision and maintenance of efficient and productive infrastructure assets. However, Nigeria, like most countries in Sub-Saharan Africa has the lowest quantity and poorest quality of stocks of infrastructure assets in the world and this phenomenally poor infrastructure has remained an impediment to development in the country. Decades of sub-optimal investment, poor maintenance culture and the fact that the required infrastructure investments could not be accommodated within the available fiscal space as a result of budgetary constraints have all contributed to the Nigeria‘s infrastructure deficit. The immediate outcome of this however is that the available infrastructure assets across the Nigerian landscape are in decrepit state and absurdly inadequate. Besides, the present demand for basic infrastructure services has grown astronomically out-stripping the supply capacity of the existing ones. Closing the infrastructure financing gap will however require increased investment by private investors through creative financing in an enabling legal and financial environment. Outside the budgetary constraints, the absence of efficient maintenance and management of infrastructure assets and quality service delivery by the public sector are some of the reasons why procurement of public infrastructure stocks by government through the traditional approach is no longer plausible and hence, the general appeal of the public-private partnership framework. However, despite all the potentials, the public private partnership technique in Nigeria has not made an appreciable impact in closing the infrastructure gaps due to lack of access to long-term financing. It is against this back-drop that this study has sought to investigate how reforms of the legal and financial infrastructure could widen access to financing through innovative financial resource mobilization in scaling-up infrastructure development and service delivery to the teeming Nigeria population. Therefore, the central thesis of this study is that the inadequacy of appropriate laws and inefficient financial system are partly responsible for the huge financing gaps in the Nigeria‘s infrastructure market and with the legal and financial reforms, an enabling legal and financial environment that would open up space for resource mobilization through innovative financing techniques and sources will be created thereby widening access to long-term financing and increasing the appetite for private investment in the nation‘s public infrastructure assets and services. So, the overarching objective of this thesis is to explore how legal and financial system reforms can facilitate the development of financial models and instruments that can help mobilize financial resources to fund infrastructure and bridge the huge infrastructure financing gaps in Nigeria in a sustainable fashion. Given the infrastructure poverty that constrains economic growth and development in Nigeria, the outcomes of this proposed study would help inform the need for the legal and financial system reforms to unlock resources in addressing the problems of financing gaps in infrastructure projects development in Nigeria. Besides, such outcomes based on the Nigerian experience in infrastructure financing and development may be turned into valuable knowledge for policy –making and further research in Nigeria. Copyright

This thesis, exploring the rule of law for international rules, offers a human bond of common good between determinacy of substance and legitimacy of structure of rules in order to evaluate international obligations of States in international law on foreign investment. In an in-depth exposition of the theoretical underpinnings and practices underlying the normative structure of rules in international law, the thesis critically questions the legal reasoning embedded in—and the authority of rules borrowed from—principles and precedents or moral and political evaluations by arbitrators in interpretation of States' contractual, customary, and treaty obligations in investment arbitrations. With crucial moral, political, social and economic ramifications for the constitutional functions of States and concomitant interests of their human members implicated in the concept of expropriation in international law, the thesis provides a framework of legitimacy in a common good approach with structural criteria of recognition and coherence for the interpretation of States' obligations in investment arbitration. Coherence brings to the fore conflicting demands of justice requiring fresh evaluation divesting a general rule of its authoritative force, and recognition brings to the fore the validation of the power to engage in moral and political evaluation. Together, these structural criteria offer a common good approach of legitimacy to test the authority of States' obligations and the power of arbitrators in hard cases. By virtue of these criteria, the thesis characterizes the nature of substantive property rights of corporations and corresponding obligations of States in foreign investment as contingent and consensual in contrast with the absolute and constitutional rights of human beings in human rights. Through coherence and recognition, the thesis also portrays a supreme status for customary international law for the normative structure and substance of States' contractual or treaty obligations in the interpretation of hard cases in international law on foreign investment. The thesis espouses a new horizon for legal reasoning in foreign investment arbitration that eschews the lex lata veneer for lex ferenda propositions manufactured from precedents and principles, on the one hand, and the sheen of law for the conception of justice of investor-State arbitrators, on the other, in cases of hard confrontation between the demands of justice.

La compétence d'un arbitre chargé d'appliquer le droit international des investissements exige l'existence préalable d'un investissement étranger. Cette étude vise à identifier ce qui constitue un investissement parmi l'ensemble des opérations économiques et financières et à déterminer les conditions auxquelles il doit répondre pour être considéré comme étranger. L'importance de la Convention de Washington explique l'attention particulière portée au Centre international pour le règlement des différends relatifs aux investissements (CIRDI). La diversité des traités bilatéraux et des autres sources normatives dans ce domaine a conduit à proposer une approche fondée sur une dissociation du contrôle sur la base des sources normatives de la compétence arbitrale. Après un exposé introductif sur l'évolution des modes de règlement des différends relatifs à la propriété étrangère et son aboutissement à l'arbitrage international actuel, la première partie de l'étude est consacrée à la définition de la notion juridique d'investissement dans une perspective de qualification par l'arbitre. La seconde partie analyse la seconde exigence pour établir la compétence de l'arbitre, celle d'extranéité de l'investissement, et elle expose les conditions liées à la nationalité de l'investisseur.

The chapter challenges claims about depoliticization in two different aspects. The first examined claim is that home states are disenfranchised from pursuing investment claims once they are lodged with ICSID. Is it the case that home states simply stay home? This chapter examines instances where home states may have played a role in investment disputes between contracting states. What the record generally reveals, however, is that home states involve themselves in disputes where ICSID hearings are imminent but not yet in play. The second, broader, reading of depoliticization maintains that disputes now are resolved without recourse to lowly politics but to ‘higher’ law. This more extravagant claim is vulnerable to the critique that investor-state dispute resolution is not emptied of political content but, instead, spills over with politics. As the regime implicates the capacity of public authority to act in a wide variety of regulatory contexts, the separation of law from politics is hard to credibly maintain. Not only are investor-state disputes embedded within regimes of political discourse and political power, the ambit of investment arbitrator discretion is so capacious that it can be said of arbitrators, as it has been said of the U.S. Supreme Court, that they can sensibly be regarded as political actors.

This thesis consists of three essays on trade, investment, and taxation that are unified by their policy relevance to developing countries. Following an introductory chapter on policy reform, the first essay revisits the institutional determinants of foreign direct investment (FDI) using a comprehensive new data set covering more than 80 countries. It exploits the presence of confirmed zero investment flows between countries to estimate productivity cut-offs of firms that invest abroad profitably. This approach corrects likely biases arising from firm heterogeneity and country selection in a theoretically derived gravity-type model. The analysis finds inward FDI to be highly responsive to cross-country variation in specific institutional provisions, such as arbitration of disputes and legal procedures to establish foreign subsidiaries. The importance of FDI-specific regulations stands out even after controlling for the general quality of institutions. Statutory openness to FDI, however, has no association with actual inflow of investment. The second essay examines cross-national differences in the survival of exports through the lenses of product, industry, and country characteristics. The estimates are derived from a new application of discrete-time models instead of the continuous-time (Cox) models that are standard in trade duration analysis. The examination of exports originating in more than 100 developing countries covering 4000 products over 12 years shows that export flows are much more fragile than suggested by trade theory. Using new measures of product sophistication and export diversification, the paper finds evidence of information and network externalities that aid export survival. Exports concentrated in a few industries or in a narrow range of destination markets exhibit higher rates of death, whereas export concentration within some industries is positively associated with survival, suggesting a synergistic network effect. The probability of export death decreases with proximity from the capital content of products to the national factor endowment, competitive real exchange rate, and bilateral trade preferences. Further, death rates for dynamic subsets of exports like manufactured components and processed food differ from other products, belying the notion that short durations are necessarily a result of poor exporter capabilities. The third essay assesses the revenue implications of coordinated tariff and tax reforms. It is shown for a sample of low-income countries over 25 years that they have had a mixed record of offsetting reductions in trade tax revenue, and that Value-Added Tax (VAT) has, at best, played a limited role. The paper then analyzes the specific case of Nepal, using a unique data set compiled from unpublished customs records of imports, tariffs, and all other taxes levied at the border. It estimates changes to revenue and domestic production associated with two sets of reforms: i) proportional tariff cuts coordinated with a strictly enforced VAT; and ii) proposed tariff cuts under a regional free trade agreement. It is shown that a revenue-neutral tax reform is conditional on the effectiveness with which domestic taxes are enforced. Furthermore, loss of revenue as a result of intra-regional free trade can be minimized through judicious use of Sensitive Lists that still cover "substantially all the trade" as required by Article XXIV of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT).

Performance requirements are part of a system of policy measures implemented by states to advance their economic, social and political objectives. A universally agreed upon definition of performance requirements is not available. Rather they are defined by the applicable legal norms and their assessment is dependent upon their effect on the parties of each individual case. The scope of legal protection these regulations provide must be measured separately for each norm within the scope of the specific legal framework. This dissertation has two objectives: First, the implementation and legal effect of performance requirements in international investment and trade law are investigated. Secondly, a legal test will be developed, that allows for an assessment of performance requirements. In a first step, the legal treatment of performance requirements will be analyzed from a theoretical perspective. Subsequently, the legal practices relating performance requirements and the relevant provisions in international investment and trade law will be identified. The developed legal test does not only do justice to the economic, social and political framework within which each performance requirement must be looked at but is also adaptable in a way that it can be applied to a variety of situations and legal traditions. It satisfies both the demands of legal certainty and clarity as well as facilitating the finding of justice on an individual basis. Understanding the advantages of foreign direct investment, the analysis performed aims promote the usage of performance requirements in a way that foreign direct investment will push the global economy forward.

Cette thèse présente le parcours difficile du droit en matière d’investissements directs à l’étranger vers son internationalisation. La difficulté d’intégration dans le droit international des normes juridiques régissant l’investissement étranger a été due aux changements intervenus dans les relations internationales, à la suite de confrontations politiques, idéologiques et surtout économiques entre les pays. Les mécanismes conventionnels, les traités bilatéraux et la multiplication des arrangements régionaux ont contribué à une juridicisation nouvelle de la société mondiale. Cependant, ce n’est qu'un instrument multilatéral global, généralement accepté et qui échapperait de ce fait aux rapports de pouvoir au niveau mondial qui pourrait consacrer l’avènement d’un droit international en matière d’investissements directs étrangers. Assurant la stabilité du système multilatéral, il serait l’outil juridique qui permettrait de régir différemment la mondialisation économique.

La législation française se fonde traditionnellement sur un conflit entre l'intérêt général, le but lucratif et le risque d'entreprise. La participation des collectivités territoriales au capital de sociétés est alors en principe interdite. De nombreux textes autorisent cependant des collectivités territoriales à participer au capital de sociétés spécifiques. La protection de l'intérêt général et l'accueil des collectivités territoriales se font dans des groupements qui dérogent au droit commun des sociétés. Ces régimes sont porteurs de risques tant pour la société elle-même que pour les collectivités territoriales. Une autre approche de la participation des collectivités territoriales au capital de sociétés devrait être envisagée. Le droit communautaire pourrait servir de référence en s'inspirant du critère de l'investisseur privé en économie de marché. La transposition en droit interne de ce critère permettrait de faire évoluer le régime de ces sociétés vers le droit commun.

Adopté souverainement par l'État afin d'aménager l'attractivité de son territoire sur le marché des investissements directs, ce régime soustrait cependant les rapports d'investissements à l'ordre juridique national. Primo, négocié avec les investisseurs dans son élaboration comme dans son application, mis en concurrence face à des régimes équivalents d'autres États : le régime est marchandisé. Secundo, le lien spécifique entre le traitement privilégié des investissements et l'affectation obligée de leurs produits vers l'exportation subvertit le principe de territorialité qui fonde le régime : il est soumis aux préférences des États importateurs et est saisi par le droit de l'OMC : d'abord, l'Accord MIC limite la marge de manoeuvre de l'État dans sa définition des obligations des investisseurs ; ensuite, parce que les avantages fiscaux forment des subventions "spécifiques" au regard de l'Accord SMC et donc susceptibles de mesures compensatoires de la part des États importateurs.

Dépolitiser le règlement des conflits relatifs aux investissements, en permettant aux Etats et aux personnes privées étrangères un accès à un forum arbitral neutre 1 était la gageure que s'étaient fixée les promoteurs de la Convention de Washington du 18 mars 1965 . Gageure en effet, dans la mesure où cette initiative s'inscrivait dans le cadre d'une problématique bicéphale : à la disparité des parties à la relation contractuelle se greffait l'ambivalence des enjeux politiques et économiques véhiculée par la notion d'investissement.