Bibliographie sélective OHADA

L'associé salarié est aujourd'hui une figure répandue dans le paysage juridique, en dépit d'une contradiction évidente : il est à la fois propriétaire du capital et subordonné à la société qui l'emploie. Cette antinomie apparente et les interrogations qui en découlent apparaissent, pourtant, majoritairement passées sous silence. Le cumul des qualités d'associé et de salarié est ainsi admis par principe, notamment depuis l'avènement des dispositifs légaux d'actionnariat salarié.Ce silence nourrit l'opportunité d'une étude approfondie de la figure de l'associé salarié. Une analyse miroir du droit des sociétés et du droit du travail est à même de vérifier la réelle compatibilité de ces qualités, tant au niveau de la licéité du cumul que des règles qui lui sont applicables. La proposition est la suivante : se plonger dans l'analyse chronologique du cumul des qualités d'associé et de salarié, de sa naissance à sa disparition, par une étude combinée du droit du travail et du droit des sociétés.En ressort une compatibilité relative des qualités tenant davantage à l'influence du droit du travail que du droit des sociétés. Ce constat ne doit cependant pas minimiser les influences réciproques des deux branches du droit. Contrairement au postulat qui semble suivi par une majorité d'auteurs, l'associé salarié n'est pas juste un salarié particulier : il est également un associé singulier. The employee shareholder is now a commonplace figure, despite a major contradiction: he is both owner of the capital and subordinate to the company that employs him. This apparent conflict and the questions it raises are largely ignored. The dual status of shareholder and employee is accepted as a matter of principle, particularly since the advent of legal employee share ownership schemes.This silence provides an opportunity for a study of the situation of the employee shareholder. A mirror analysis of company law and labour law is able to study the real compatibility of these qualities, simultaneously of the lawfulness of the combination and the rules applicable to it. The proposal is: to analyse in chronological order the dual status of shareholder and employee, from its inception to its demise, by a combined study of labour law and company law.A relative compatibility of these roles emerges. It is due more to the influence of labour law than company law. However, this observation should not minimise the reciprocal influences of the two branches. Contrary to the assumption that seems to be followed by some authors, the employee shareholder is not just a particular employee: he is also a singular shareholder.

6102 sayılı Türk Ticaret Kanunu m. 531'de anonim şirketin özel sona erme hallerinden biri olarak haklı sebeplerle fesih düzenlenmiştir. Bu düzenleme ile 6762 sayılı Türk Ticaret Kanunu döneminde anonim şirketin haklı sebeple feshinin mümkün olup olmadığı yönündeki tartışmalar sona ermiş ve anonim şirketin haklı sebeple feshi kurumu hukukumuza kazandırılmıştır. Anonim şirketin haklı sebeple feshi, haklı sebeplerin varlığı durumunda, sermayenin en az onda birini ve halka açık şirketlerde yirmide birini temsil eden pay sahipleri tarafından istenebilir. Anonim şirketin haklı sebeple feshi davası şirket merkezinin bulunduğu yer asliye ticaret mahkemesinde açılır. Kanunda anonim şirketin haklı sebeple feshinde haklı sebep kavramı tanımlanmamış ve haklı sebep teşkil edebilecek durumlara örnek gösterilmemiştir. Kanun gerekçesinde bu kavramın niteliklerinin gösterilmesinin ve tanımlanmasının yargı kararları ve doktrine bırakıldığı belirtilmiştir. İleri sürülen sebeplerin haklı sebep olarak kabul edilip edilmemesi mahkemenin takdirindedir. Yargılama sonucunda mahkemenin şirketin feshine, davacı pay sahiplerinin paylarının değerinin ödenerek şirketten çıkarılmasına veya uygun düşen ve kabul edilebilir diğer bir çözüme karar verme yetkisi bulunmaktadır. Çalışmamız kapsamında anonim şirketin haklı sebeple feshinde haklı sebep teşkil edebilecek durumlar incelenmiştir. Bu inceleme yapılırken kanun metni ve gerekçesi, doktrinde ileri sürülen görüşler ve yargı kararları ile çalışmamız desteklenmiştir. Article 531 of the Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 regulates the dissolution of a joint stock company for just cause as one of its special grounds for termination. With the introduction of this provision, the debates regarding whether the dissolution of a joint stock company for just cause was possible under the period of the Turkish Commercial Code No. 6762 have been resolved, and the institution of dissolution of a joint stock company for just cause has been incorporated into our legal system. The dissolution of a joint stock company for just cause may be requested by shareholders representing at least one-tenth of the capital, or one-twentieth in publicly traded companies, in the presence of just causes. The lawsuit for the dissolution of a joint stock company for just cause is filed in the commercial court where the company's head office is located. The law does not define the concept of "just cause" in the context of the dissolution of a joint stock company, nor does it provide examples of situations that might constitute just cause. According to the legislative intent, the determination and definition of the characteristics of this concept are left to judicial decisions and legal doctrine. Whether the reasons presented are accepted as just cause is at the discretion of the court. Following the trial, the court has the authority to decide on the dissolution of the company, the payment of the value of the shares to the plaintiff shareholders in exchange for their exit from the company, or another suitable and acceptable solution. This study examines situations that may constitute just cause for the dissolution of a joint stock company for just cause. In this analysis, the text and rationale of the law, views expressed in legal doctrine and judicial decisions have been taken into account.

L’opération de fusion-absorption d’une personne morale est une question en soi difficilement appréhendée tant dans les effets qu’elles déploient que dans l’organisation d’une telle opération. Cette difficulté propre à la nature d’une telle opération prendra une allure tout autre lorsqu’une personne morale membre d’un conseil d’administration s’y trouve impliquer. Toutes les hypothèses pouvant être développées traduisent non seulement la diversité mais également la complexité d’un tel sujet. Si cette question telle qu’elle est évoquée, est révélatrice du caractère instrumental du droit des sociétés, force est de reconnaître que la résolution d’une telle problématique devrait se faire par la conciliation des caractéristiques propres au droit des fusions mais aussi en tenant compte des spécificités entourant la personne morale administrateur. La transmission universelle du patrimoine, la réorganisation des pouvoirs post-fusion, les droits des créanciers, le problème de la représentation de la personne morale dans la société absorbante, la gouvernance de la société administrée, l’intrusion d’une personne morale tierce, les questions de fusions internationales sont autant de questions soulevées par cette problématique. La solution de cette problématique commande une étude minutieuse des questions soulevées à l’aune du droit OHADA et du droit français.

La notion d’apport en nature revêt des enjeux d’une grande complexité, tant sur le plan juridique que pratique. Elle soulève de nombreuses difficultés d’interprétation et de mise en œuvre. Celles-ci sont exacerbées par l’essor de la diversité des biens et droits susceptibles d’être apportés en société, ainsi que par la multiplicité des modes de rémunération des associés. Cependant, cette évolution n’a pas été suffisamment suivie par le législateur et la contribution d’une partie importante de la jurisprudence et de la doctrine antérieures est devenue quasi obsolète. Face à cette problématique émergente, un renouvellement du contour juridique de la notion d’apport en nature dans toutes ses dimensions est devenu une nécessité impérieuse.Cette thèse propose une approche globale de la notion d’apport en nature. Cet apport peut être effectué à titre particulier, permettant ainsi la réintégration d’un ou plusieurs actifs ou activités utiles au développement de la société. En outre, le délestage d’un actif non nécessaire à l’exploitation, par voie d’apport, est également possible. Toutefois, le régime juridique de droit commun auquel est soumis cet apport peut s’avérer inapplicable en raison de restrictions de nature légale ou contractuelle. Dans ce contexte, l’apport à titre universel constitue une solution pertinente pour surmonter cette contrainte. Cet apport concerne notamment les opérations de fusion, de scission et d’apport partiel d’actifs et se concrétise toujours par une transmission universelle de patrimoine, dont les enjeux et conséquences sont examinés en profondeur dans la présente étude.Ce travail aborde également le paradoxe lié à l’évaluation de l’apport en nature et aux modes de rémunération et tente de mettre en évidence une synthèse des insuffisances du cadre législatif et doctrinal entourant le sujet. Il propose ainsi des alternatives envisageables pour surmonter les contraintes inhérentes à la réalisation de certaines opérations d’apport. Restent d’autres situations, dans lesquelles l’intervention du législateur apparaît nécessaire pour contourner les contraintes mises en évidence dans l’étude.

Contrairement aux entreprises dites "classiques", qui ont pour objectif principal la production de biens ou de services dans un cadre lucratif, l'entreprise de tendance est une catégorie juridique et sociale à part. Sa spécificité ne réside pas dans la recherche de profits, mais dans la promotion et la défense de convictions, qu'elles soient religieuses, politiques, ou philosophiques. Cette dimension convictionnelle distingue ces entreprises des autres et impose de définir avec précision leurs contours, car toutes ne peuvent pas revendiquer ce statut. L'entreprise de tendance n’est donc pas un modèle d'entreprise ordinaire. Au cœur de son fonctionnement se trouvent des valeurs et des croyances qui façonnent non seulement son activité mais aussi son identité. Ce type d’entreprise devient un instrument au service d'une idéologie ou d'une foi, portant un message à la société et jouant un rôle crucial dans le maintien du pluralisme idéologique dans une démocratie. Cependant, la reconnaissance juridique des entreprises de tendance varie largement d’un pays à l’autre, en fonction de l’histoire, des sensibilités sociétales et du cadre législatif.La manière dont les États reconnaissent et encadrent les entreprises de tendance reflète leur conception de la place des convictions religieuses ou politiques dans l'espace public. En fonction de cette reconnaissance sociale et légale, ces entreprises peuvent bénéficier de régimes juridiques particuliers, tant dans leurs relations avec les salariés qu’en matière de financement. Cette reconnaissance variable, ainsi que les privilèges qui peuvent en découler, doivent être analysés, notamment à l'aune des décisions des Cours européennes.

Le remboursement des apports en société est l’une des notions utilisées fréquemment juridiquement, mais qui n’est pas définie ni par la loi ni par la jurisprudence ; il n’existe pas un régime juridique, indépendant et délimité, qui l’encadre. De plus, un nombre limité d’auteurs ont fourni des définitions pour le remboursement des apports qui ne sont pas même unifiées. Ils ont aussi fait référence à la restitution des apports souvent dans le même contexte, sans établir une distinction entre les deux termes « remboursement » et « restitution ». Avec l’absence d’une définition précise de remboursement des apports, les questions se posent : si d’après le régime juridique applicable dans le cadre des sociétés, il existe une obligation de restitution des apports qui va se varier selon le type de l’apport en cause ; ou le remboursement de l’apport constitue le paiement d’une obligation, autre que celle d’une restitution. Notamment, à la lumière de la relation entre l’apport et le capital social en vertu de laquelle les titres sociaux sont eux qui représentent les différents droits de l’associé et le montant du capital social est celui qui représente la dette de la société et l’ensemble des créances des associés. L’étude fournit ainsi une identification des éléments caractéristiques de remboursement des apports en société. Elle fournit également une identification de ses éléments perturbateurs, en abordant la question d’éventuelle manifestation de remboursement des apports au cours de la vie sociale, et en analysant le statut original de l’apporteur en industrie dont l’apport ne fait pas juridiquement l’objet de remboursement. The reimbursement of the contributions to a company is one of the notions frequently used in legal contexts, but it has not been defined either by law or by jurisprudence. There is no independent and defined legal regime governing it. Moreover, only a limited number of authors have provided definitions of the reimbursement of contributions that are not even unified. They have referred to the restitution of contributions, always in the same context, without making the distinction between the two terms "reimbursement" and "restitution". With the absence of a precise definition of the reimbursement of contributions, questions arise: according to the applicable legal regime for companies, does an obligation of restitution of contributions, varying according to the type of contribution, exist, or is the reimbursement of contributions the payment of an obligation other than restitution? These questions are especially relevant in light of the relationship between contributions and capital, under which shares represent the different rights of the partners and the amount of the capital represents the debt of the company. Thus, the study provides an identification of the characteristic elements of the reimbursement of contributions to a company. It also identifies its disruptive elements by addressing the eventual manifestation of the reimbursement of the contributions during the life of the company, and by analyzing the distinct status of a partner who has made a contribution in industry, which is not legally subject to reimbursement.

Despite the emergence of corporate governance as a formal discipline more than thirty years ago, the proliferation internationally of scholarly work on the topic and its formal regulation over this period, the scope, definition and direction of corporate governance remain contested. Company theories could potentially assist in this regard but have been inconsistent in their explanations of the both the means and ends of corporate governance. This has led to scepticism about the efficacy of theories to illuminate the phenomena associated with companies and company law. Notwithstanding, theory is critical as it makes explicit what is implicit in policymaking by regulators, as well as in the behaviour and decision-making by corporate actors, so that regulation and decisions are transparent for analysis and evaluation. The study, therefore, set out to provide a synthesis and doctrinal analysis of the main theories on the nature and general purpose of corporations in historical context. It was found that objections can be raised against all of these theories to a greater or lesser extent for inaccurate portrayal of the law, limited explanatory power and detachment from the real word. This study shows that corporate theories are a product of the settings in which they have developed and consequently none of these theories represents a universal or absolute truth, nor are they an inevitability due to widespread adoption and use. This leaves room for new formulations of the corporate form and its purpose fit for today’s context with its political, social and environmental challenges. This dissertation also includes further directions for theoretical exploration.

This paper constitutes a composite analysis of the legal framework and procedures for removing directors and the key challenges presented by the framework. It achieves this by looking at four legal questions: Firstly, it looks into what is the legal framework for director removal in South Africa, secondly, it delves into the challenges and/or uncertainties presented by this process, and further explores if there are any possible learnings South Africa can learn from foreign jurisdiction.

With the adoption of the Act to amend the Environment Quality Act in order to reinforce compliance in 2011, the legislator came to establish a system of administrative monetary penalties for the protection of the environment. This new regime aims for a faster sanction that can be issued directly by the administrative power. This new sanction not only strengthens the applicability of the Environment Quality Act, but it also adds an additional burden to Quebec businesses. The objective of this thesis is to understand to what extent the system of administrative monetary penalties impacts the liability of administrators. To do this, we will first present the Environment Quality Act, which mainly governs the protection of the environment in Quebec, and above all describe the nature and objective of this system of administrative monetary penalties. Next, we will deal with certain aspects of this regime which have implications for administrator's liability. Finally, we will attempt to briefly introduce some of the observations we have made regarding the challenges and limitations of this administrative regime. Avec l’adoption de la Loi modifiant la Loi sur la qualité de l’environnement afin d’en renforcer le respect en 2011, le législateur est venu instaurer un régime de sanctions administratives pécuniaires en matière de protection de l’environnement. Ce nouveau régime vise une sanction plus rapide qui peut être émise directement par le pouvoir administratif. Cette nouvelle sanction renforce non seulement l’applicabilité de la Loi sur la qualité de l’environnement, mais elle ajoute en même temps un fardeau supplémentaire aux entreprises québécoises. L’objectif de ce mémoire est de comprendre dans quelle mesure le régime de sanctions administratives pécuniaires impacte la responsabilité des administrateurs. Pour ce faire, nous allons d’abord présenter la Loi sur la qualité de l’environnement qui encadre principalement la protection de l’environnement au Québec et surtout décrire la nature et l’objectif de ce régime de sanctions administratives pécuniaires. Ensuite, nous traiterons de certains aspects de ce régime qui entraînent des conséquences au niveau de la responsabilité des administrateurs. Finalement, nous tenterons d’introduire brièvement certaines remarques que nous avons tirées concernant les défis et limites de ce régime administratif.

This work aims to analyze the aggregation of creditors into classes within the scope of judicial reorganization in accordance with Law No. 11.101/2005, as well as the procedural and principled impacts involved, such as the approval of the judicial reorganization plan, the aggregation of creditors into classes, the voting system, and the principles of par condicio creditorum and preservation of the company. It aims to identify gaps and mechanisms that may lead to the distortion of the intended purpose and presents premises and hypotheses for limiting and practically implementing the topic to avoid abusive practices. Thus, this work presents brief introductory and fundamental notions about judicial reorganization by the presentation of basic concepts related to the judicial reorganization plan and the division of creditors into classes, demonstrating the origins, objectives, and expectations of the establishment of classes as presented in Law No. 11.101/2005. Furthermore, specific study objectives include analyzing how the division of classes of creditors affects the voting on the judicial reorganization plan and how the possibility of creating subclasses - such as strategic creditors - has been addressed and its direct and indirect effects on the procedure and involved creditors. Next, this work verifies the legal provisions on the topic - such as Article 41 of Law No. 11.101/2005 as well as the consequences and impasses observed throughout the years of the law\'s existence that demands attention and changes to ensure that treatment of creditors in the context of reorganization occurs in a more just and appropriate manner for all parties involved. Thereby, alternative solutions will be presented for better management of the judicial reorganization procedure regarding creditor classes and subdivisions to ensure and preserve the objective of judicial reorganization, always considering the economic, political, and social factors that influence the analysis of the company\'s economic viability, which are constantly changing.

Le législateur OHADA s'est inspiré du droit français pour fixer le cadre juridique de la variabilité du capital social ; d'où l'étude orientée vers une approche comparatiste. Cette approche a permis une confrontation entre deux (02) systèmes juridiques, en vue de dégager les problèmes de droit et d'envisager une amélioration du cadre juridique de la variabilité du capital en droit OHADA ; l'objectif étant de dégager une contribution à l'amélioration du droit OHADA à travers le droit comparé. A l'analyse, il ressort que la variabilité du capital social comporte des facteurs attractifs pour les acteurs économiques. En effet, elle constitue un mécanisme de financement des sociétés, en raison d'une part, de sa capacité à renforcer les capitaux propres sans charge financière et, d'une part, de sa capacité à constituer un actionnariat spécifiquement orienté sur la rentabilité des sociétés. De même, elle pourrait susciter un intérêt pour les investisseurs intéressés par la célérité et l'efficacité dans les opérations de financement des entreprises. L'efficacité du financement de la société par la mise en œuvre de la clause de variabilité du capital est tributaire, entre autres, de son attractivité auprès des acteurs économiques de manière générale, des investissements et des professionnels du droit en particulier. Cependant, plusieurs facteurs ne militeraient pas en faveur du recours à la variabilité du capital. Parmi ces facteurs figurent les risques découlant de la réduction du capital et la méconnaissance des acteurs économiques et des praticiens du droit de l'existence et/ou du fonctionnement du mécanisme de la variabilité du capital. Or, ces risques ne sont pas irrémédiables, dans la mesure où il existe des mécanismes juridiques appropriés pour y faire face. En somme, l'analyse du fonctionnement du mécanisme de la variabilité du capital social a mis en évidence ses capacités de mobilisation de financement, de recapitalisation de la société, de restructuration de la société et d'apporter une contribution à l'amélioration du cadre juridique des sociétés à capital variable. Elle a également permis de démontrer l'insuffisance de la justification ou du fondement du désintérêt des acteurs économiques et des praticiens du droit à l'égard de la variabilité du capital social

Anonim şirket organları, özel hukuktaki sözleşme özgürlüğünün bir sonucu olarak kendi yetki alanlarına giren konuları iç yönerge ile düzenleyebilirler. Anonim şirket yönetim kurulu da yetki alanına giren konularda iç yönerge çıkarmak suretiyle düzenleme yapabilir. Türk Ticaret Kanunu'nda yönetim kurulunun yönetim yetkisini devrettiği ve sınırlı yetkili ticari vekil ve diğer tacir yardımcıları atadığı durumlarda bu işlemleri bir iç yönerge çıkararak gerçekleştirmesi zorunlu tutulmuştur. Bununla birlikte anonim şirket yönetim kurulu iç yönergesinde iç yönerge çıkarma zorunluluğu doğuran bu iki durum dışında yetki alanına giren diğer birçok konuyu düzenleyebilir. Bu kapsamda belirli durumlarda çıkarılması zorunlu olan bu iç yönergelerin zorunlu içeriğinin dışında, iç yönergede, yönetim kurulunun görevleri, çalışma usulü, yönetim kurulu üyelerinin ve yönetim yetkisinin devredildiği kişilerin hak ve yükümlülükleri gibi birçok husus yer alabilir. Bu düzenlemelerin sınırını da ilk başta Türk Ticaret Kanunu ve diğer kanunların emredici hükümleri oluşturur. Yönetim kurulunun Türk Ticaret Kanunu'nda çizilen yetki sınırları da bu çerçevede yönetim kurulu iç yönergesinin azami içeriğini belirler. Çalışmamızın ilk bölümünde anonim şirketlerde iç yönerge terimi açıklanmaya çalışılmış, ardından yönetim kurulu iç yönergesi terimi yetki devrinden ve sınırlı yetkili ticari vekil ve diğer tacir yardımcısı atanmasından bağımsız şekilde yönetim kurulunun çıkardığı düzenleyici bir metin olarak ele alınmıştır. Çalışmamızın ikinci bölümünde anonim şirket yönetim kurulu iç yönergesinin içerebileceği düzenlemeler ve bunların iç yönergede ne şekilde düzenlenebileceği incelenmiştir. Çalışmamızın son bölümünde ise yönetim kurulunun kendi çıkardığı iç yönergeyi ihlal etmesinin sonuçları gibi iç yönergeye ilişkin diğer meseleler ele alınmıştır. The organs of a joint stock company, as a result of the freedom of contract in private law, can regulate matters within their jurisdiction through internal directives. The board of directors of a joint stock company can also regulate matters within its jurisdiction by issuing internal directives. According to the Turkish Commercial Code, it is mandatory for the board of directors to execute transactions, such as delegating management authority and appointing limited authority commercial representatives and other merchant assistants, through the issuance of an internal directive. However, beyond these two instances where issuing an internal directive is mandatory, the board of directors can regulate many other matters within its jurisdiction through an internal directive. In this context, aside from the mandatory content in specific situations, an internal directive can include many issues such as the duties of the board of directors, working procedures, and the rights and obligations of board members and those to whom management authority has been delegated. The boundaries of these regulations are primarily determined by the mandatory provisions of the Turkish Commercial Code and other laws. The authority limits outlined in the Turkish Commercial Code also define the maximum content of the board's internal directive. In the first part of our study, the term "internal directive" in joint stock companies is explained. Subsequently, the term "internal directive of the board of directors" is examined as a regulatory document issued by the board, independent of authority delegation and the appointment of limited authority commercial representatives and other merchant assistants. In the second part of our study, the potential regulations that could be included in the internal directive of the board of directors of a joint stock company and how these can be arranged within the internal directive are analyzed. In the final part of our study, other issues related to internal directives, such as the consequences of the board of directors violating its own internal directive, are discussed.

Bu doktora tezi, 6102 sayılı Türk Ticaret Kanunu'nun 454. maddesinde düzenlenen imtiyazlı pay sahipleri özel kurulunu konu almaktadır. Çalışmanın ilk bölümünde imtiyaza ilişkin genel bilgiler verildikten sonra ikinci bölümünde imtiyazlı pay sahipleri özel kurulunun yapısı, yetkisi, hukuki niteliği üzerinde durulmuştur. Çalışmanın üçüncü ve dördüncü bölümlerinde, imtiyazlı pay sahipleri özel kurulunun toplanma şartları ile toplantı süreci kapsamlı bir şekilde ele alınmıştır. Çalışmanın son bölümünde ise imtiyazlı pay sahipleri özel kurul kararlarının hukuki niteliği, etkisi ve hükümsüzlüğü irdelenmiştir. Çalışmanın hazırlanmasında, Türk hukukundaki ilgili mevzuat hükümleri başta olmak üzere karşılaştırmalı hukuktaki dikkate değer yasal düzenlemeler, öğretideki görüşler ve yargı kararlarından faydalanılmıştır. Anahtar kelimeler: Anonim şirketler, imtiyaz, TTK m. 454, imtiyazlı pay, imtiyazlı pay sahipleri özel kurulu. This doctoral thesis deals with the special committee of privileged shareholders regulated under Article 454 of the Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102. After giving general information about privilege in the first part of the study, the structure, authority, and legal nature of the special committee of privileged shareholders are mentioned in the second part. In the third and fourth parts of the study, the conditions for the meeting and the meeting process of the special committee of privileged shareholders are extensively discussed. In the last part of the study, the legal effect, nature, and invalidity of the special committee decisions of privileged shareholders are examined. In the preparation of the study, notable legal regulations in comparative law, doctrines and judicial decisions, especially related legislation in Turkish law have been benefited from. Key Words: Joint Stock Companies, privilege, the article 454 of the Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102, privileged share, the special committee of privileged shareholders.

In law it is common to encounter two separate pieces of legislation which govern a single matter or transaction, for example, the Companies Act 71 of 2008 (the Companies Act) and the Securities Transfer Act 25 of 2007 both of which address the sale of shares. Similarly, the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962 (the Income Tax Act) and the Companies Act both have regulations which govern, respectively, tax law and company law matters in South Africa. These two Acts overlap in various business and commercial fields as tax is frequently an important component of any business transaction undertaken by a company. Issues, however, arise when the regulations in these two Acts, are inconsistent. This can be observed if one compares the current South African Income Tax and Companies Act, specifically as regards the sections involving merger and amalgamation transactions. Section 44 of the Income Tax Act governs merger and amalgamation transactions from a tax perspective and provides for tax rollover relief if certain requirements are met. The regulations governing mergers and amalgamations under the Companies Act are contained in sections 113, 115 and 116 of the Act. Although these sections in both Acts address the same transaction – a merger or amalgamation between two or more companies – there are several discrepancies between the regulations in the two Acts which appear to operate entirely independently of one another. In practice, one often sees that other sections in the Companies Act and Income Tax Act are used to achieve a merger due, in the main, to the uncertainties in the application of the relevant merger sections in the two Acts and the limited interaction between them. This study identifies and assesses the impact of the discrepancies identified in these two Acts in relation to merger and amalgamation transactions. The study makes recommendations to address these discrepancies and to align the South African Companies Act and Income Tax Act as regards merger/amalgamation transactions.

تهدف دراسة موضوع انسحاب الشريك في القانون الجزائري والقانون المقارن إلى تحديد التنظيم القانوني لعملية انسحاب الشريك من الشركة، والوقوف على أسباب ومبررات عملية الانسحاب، وأهم الوسائل المتاحة لتحقيقه، خاصة وأنّ آثار الانسحاب تنصرف أساسا إلى الشريك المنسحب، كما تمتدإلى الشركة والشركاء والغير الذي تعامل مع الشركة. وقد أثبتت الدراسة المقارنة في القانونين الجزائري والفرنسي، مدى تأثر القانون الجزائري بالقانون الفرنسي، بسبب غياب تنظيم قانوني خاص في التشريع الجزائري لمسالة انسحاب الشريك من الشركة. ونتيجة لهذا الفراغ القانوني، استوجب الرجوع إلى القواعد العامة في القانون المدني، الذي ينظم عقد الشركة بصفة عامة، مع الأخذ بعين الاعتبار خصوصية الشركات التجارية والأحكام الخاصة المنظمة لها. إنّ انسحاب الشريك، قد يكون إراديًا في حالة قيامه بالتخلّي عن حقوقه الاجتماعية في الشركة، وقد يكون الانسحاب لا إراديا، عندما يكون عن طريق حكم قضائي، بحيث يتم في هذه الحالة إنهاء مهام الشريك من دون إرادته. وكقاعدة عامة، فإن انسحاب الشريك يِؤدي حتما إلى انقضاء الشركة، لاسيما إذا تعلق الأمر بشركات الأشخاص، إلا إذا كانت القوانين الأساسية للشركة والشركاء الباقون، قد قرروا خلاف ذلك، بمعنى استمرار الشركة. L’étude du retrait de l’associé en droit algérien et droit comparé a pour but de déterminer la réglementation juridique du mécanisme du retrait de l’associé de la société, afin de mettre l’accent sur les motifs du retrait, les moyens et techniques juridiques pour y parvenir, mais surtout ses effets, car le retrait touche principalement les droits de l’associé, les partenaires associés, et enfin les tiers. L’étude comparative du droit algérien et français, réaffirme l’influence du droit algérien par le droit français en raison de l’absence d’une règlementation spécifique relative au droit de retrait de l’associé. En raison de ce vide juridique, il est nécessaire de se référer aux règles générales du droit civil qui régissent le contrat de société, tout en tenant compte des spécificités des différents types de sociétés commerciales et des textes qui les régissent. Il est à préciser, que le retrait de l’associé peut être volontaire suite à sa renonciation à ses droits sociaux, mais il peut être involontaire dans le cas du retrait judicaire, quand il s’agit de mettre fin de manière unilatérale aux fonctions de l’associé. En règle générale, le retrait de l’associé entraine obligatoirement la dissolution de la société, notamment dans le cas des sociétés de personnes, sauf si les statuts de la société ou les associés ont convenus autrement, c’est à dire de la continuité de la société.

المبدأ العام في الشركة ذات المسؤولية المحدودة هو تقييد التنازل عن الحصص، إذ لا يجوز التنازل عن الحصص إلى الغير إلا بموافقة أغلبية الشركاء الحائزين لثلاثة أرباع رأس المال. وهو ما نصت علية المادة571 من القانون التجاري. والاستثناء حرية التنازل عن الحصص إلى الأصول والفروع والأزواج مالم ينص القانون الأساسي على تقييد التنازل. كما يخضع فيها التنازل عن الحصص للاسترداد وهو حق مقرر لمصلحة الشركاء والشركة لشراء الحصص المرغوب في التنازل عنها في حالة رفض الموافقة على المتنازل إليه. وإذا كان الأصل العام في الشركة ذات المسؤولية المحدودة هو تقييد التنازل عن الحصص، فإن الحصص في هذه الشركة تنتقل بكل حرية إلى ورثة الشريك، بشرط أن لا يترتب على ذلك زيادة عدد الشركاء عن الحد الأقصى المقرر قانونا والذي هو 50 شريكا. ومع ذلك يمكن للشركاء تقييد انتقال الحصص إلى الورثة بشرط أن يتم إدراج هذا الشرط في القانون الأساسي للشركة. The general principle in a limited liability company is to restrict the assignment/ abdication of shares, as it is not permissible to assign shares to third parties except with the share-holders majority’s approval who possess three-quarters of the capital. This is what is stipulated in Article 571 of the Commercial Law. The exception is the freedom to assign/transfer shares to ascendants, descendants, and spouses, unless the Basic Law stipulates a restriction of abdication. In addition, the assignment of shares is subject to recovery, which is a right established in the interest of the partners and the company to purchase the desired shares to be assigned in the event of refusal to approve the assignee. Therefore if the general principle in the limited liability company is to restrict the abdication from shares, then the shares in this company are transferred freely to the partner’s heirs, provided that this does not result in an increase in the number of partners beyond the legally prescribed maximum, which are 50 partners. However, the partners can restrict the transfer of shares to the heirs, provided that this condition is included in the articles of association of the company.

Susceptible d'être lésés dans leurs droits représentés par les actions dont ils disposent, les minoritaires dans une société anonyme, ont besoin d'être protégés « non parce qu'ils sont minoritaires, mais parce que leurs intérêts apparaissent comme dignes de protection ». Il n'est pas rare dans le cadre du fonctionnement de la société anonyme d'assister à la prise de décisions contraires, non seulement à l'intérêt des minoritaires, mais également à l'intérêt social, par les actionnaires majoritaires dans l'unique dessein de satisfaire les membres de la majorité au détriment des autres actionnaires. Cette tendance à l'écrasement des minoritaires entraîne des conflits, sinon des oppositions entre actionnaires conduisant à la constitution de blocs antagonistes dont l'attitude peut provoquer une crise au sein de la société. L'étude réside dans l'analyse des garanties et dans la recherche constante d'une protection efficace qu'offrent le législateur et l'autorité du marché financier aux investisseurs minoritaires dans l'espace OHADA. Cette étude étendue en droit français existe aussi en droit OHADA.

مسؤولية الشركات التجارية في الجانب الجنائي هي مفهوم قانوني يحدد امكانية مساءلة الشركات او المؤسسات التجارية جنائيا عن الجرائم التي ترتكب في اطار أنشطتها. تاريخيا كان يتم ملاحقة ومساءلة الأفراد جنائيا فقط عن افعالهم الاجرامية ومع طفرة قانون الأعمال وتزايد الوعي بضرورة مساءلة الشركات اصبحت مسؤولية الشركات التجارية جزائيا واقعا في العديد من البلدان. Corporate criminal liability is a legal concept that determines the possibility of holding corporations or commercial entities criminally accountable for crimes committed within the scope of their activities. Historically, only individuals were pursued and held criminally responsible for their criminal actions. However, with the evolution of business law and increased awareness of the need to hold corporations accountable, corporate criminal liability has become a reality in many countries Corporate criminal liability is based on the principle that a corporation can be considered an independent entity separate from its directors, employees, and shareholders. Therefore, if a criminal offense is committed within the company's operations, it can be prosecuted and tried independently of the individuals associated with it. The specific criminal offenses for which corporations can be held accountable vary according to national legislation, but they typically include acts such as fraud, bribery, money laundering, tax evasion, environmental violations, human rights abuses, forgery, unfair competition, and others. When a corporation is criminally prosecuted, it can face severe penalties, including hefty fines, asset seizure, dissolution of the

تحتل حماية الغير المتعامل مع الشركات التجارية مكانة مهمة في القانون التجاري حيث كرس لها المشرع العديد من الأحكام والمبادئ القانونية التي تساهم في إستقرار المعاملات التجارية للشركات التجارية من جهة، والتي تدعم الثقة في معاملات الشركة مع محيطها الخارجي من جهة أخرى، وذلك نظرا للدور الذي يؤديه الغير في تطوير و إزدهار الشركة وتشجيع المتعاملين للإستثمار في هذا القطاع الاقتصادي المهم. قام المشرع بخطوات مهمة جعل من خلالها الغير يتدخل في حياة الشركة ونشاطها وذلك تخفيفا لآثار إعتبار هذا الغير عضوا خارجيا لا علم له بما يجري داخل الشركة التجارية، لكن تبني المشرع لأنظمة قانونية من أجل الغير لا يعني بلوغ النصوص القانونية هدفها الذي قررت من أجله . The protection of third parties dealing with commercial companies occupies an important place in the commercial law, as the legislator devoted many legal provisions and principles to it that contribute to the stability of commercial transactions of commercial companies on the one hand, and that support confidence in the company’s transactions with its external environment on the other hand, due to the role it plays Others contribute to the development and prosperity of the company and encourage customers to invest in this important economic sector. The legislator took important steps through which he made third parties interfere in the life and activity of the company in order to mitigate the effects of considering this third party as an external member who has no knowledge of what is going on inside the commercial company, but the legislator’s adoption of legal systems for the sake of third parties does not mean that the legal texts have reached their goal for which they were decided

Groups of companies are a complex corporate structure, whose regulation can be problematic, especially when it comes to liability. Indeed, liability within corporate groups draws forth a series of issues principally due to the principles of separate corporate personality and limited liability. In the context of limited liability, which is based on the notion of separate legal personality, the main issue waxes the protection of the creditors, in particular the creditors of the subsidiaries. One can find three regulatory templates for handling corporate groups and their liability: policing via general company and/or civil law (such as the English model); policing via special group legislation (such as the German model); and policing via branches of law such as insolvency law, antitrust law, and contract law, among others (which is the case in numerous jurisdictions, either coupled with the first or the second model). Lifting the corporate veil has come as an answer to corporate separateness, by permitting to ignore the shareholders’ limited liability and hold them personally liable for the debts of their companies in specific circumstances. However, one can hardly find cases in which the corporate veil has been successfully lifted, due to many factors. Other important questions that are posed in the scope of corporate groups liability are the parent company’s liability for the payment of its daughter companies’ debts when insolvency strikes and other respects, besides the matter of group liability. Furthermore, liability is as well a key player in terms of tort law, and corporate social responsibility has therefore found a place in the sun in the present climate.