Bibliographie sélective OHADA

- Bridging the Public-Private Law Divide in the Conflict of Laws; - New Practices in Alternative Dispute Resolution: New Pathways to Peace; - The Singapore Convention: A Giant Leap for Mediation or Just Too Good to Be True; - Potential Nexus Between the Enforceability of Foreign Judgments and the Quality of Civil Justice in ASEAN Did the Preliminary Objections Judgment Resolve the Chagos Archipelago Sovereignty Dispute? - The Order of Periodic Penalty Payments by the CJEU in Cases Filed by a State Against Another State; - The Dichotomy of Obligations of Conduct and Result in International Investment Law; - Investment Arbitration Reform: Third-Party Funding in Investment Arbitration; - Between Protection and Access to Justice: On the Regulation of Returns in Third-Party Litigation Funding; - Contract Adjustment in Arbitration : Should the Approach Be Adjusted? - Current Challenges of Enforcing Annulled Arbitral Awards; - Condifentiality of Arbitral Awards on National, International and Institutional Level; - Digitalisation of Judicial Cooperation in the EU: A Long Road Ahead; - Resolving Cross-Border Consumer Disputes: The Digital Experience in China; - Law Applicable to Non-Consumer Contracts Concluded at an Electronic Auction; - Can Robot Judges Solve the So-Called “Hard Cases”? - Current Challenges of Cross-Border Disputes in Slovakia : Is Slovak Law Anchored in the 21st century

- Virtual Arbitration Hearings in Times of COVID-19 (And Beyond); - International Arbitration and Blockchain: Current State, Types, Characteristics and the Future Perspective; - Use of Artificial Intelligence in Arbitration; - The Impact of Brexit on the Arbitration Procedure in Great Britain; - May Misapplication of EU Law Give Rise to International Responsibility of the Member State ... Under Investment Treaties? - International Investment Court System: The Future of Investment Dispute Settlement? - EU and Its New Mechanism for the ISDS in the Protection of FDI – What the Future Holds? - (Un)Clean Hands in International Investment Arbitration: Some Cleaning Required? - Challenges of Arbitrators in Inter-State Cases: A Different Cattle of Fish? - “Rules of Law” and Lex Mercatoria Determination Under the Auspice of ICC Arbitration; - Sources of Transnational Public Policy in International Commercial Arbitration; - Regulation of Arbitration Agreements Under New York Convention; - Comfortable Satisfaction Before the Court of Arbitration for Sport: Consistency Despite Differences? - Comparison of ICC Expert Report vs. ICC Arbitration Award; - Analysis of Civil Law Consequences of Corruption Under the Czech Law... in the Light of International Commercial Arbitration; - The Crime of Bending the Law From the Point of View of the Arbitrator ... of the Court of Arbitration and Application Practice; - The Arbitration Convention as One of the Measures to Eliminate Double Taxation ... in the European Union and in Slovak Republic; - Possibility of Resolving Individual Labor Disputes in Croatian Law by Arbitration; - What We Know, We Don’t Know About Macao’s Arbitration Framework and the Way Forward.

Content research papers : - The Application of CISG in International Arbitration; - CISG and Arbitration in the Hungarian Legal Practice; - Time Limits in Arbitration Agreements : What Can We Expect, if We Fail to Meet Them? - Interpretation Hardships Regarding the CISG, in Particular Article 7; - Awarding Punitive Damages in Czech Arbitration Proceedings; - Award of Legal Costs in Arbitration with Focus on Regulation in the Slovak Republic; - Advantage or a Disadvantage? The Costs of Arbitration Court Proceedings in Hungary.

An effective commercial arbitration regime matters for foreign investors. It gives parties the autonomy to create a dispute resolution system tailored to increasingly complex disputes. Foreign investors view arbitration as a way to mitigate risks by providing legal certainty on enforcement rights, due process, and access to justice. The Arbitrating and Mediating Disputes indicators assess the legal and institutional framework for commercial arbitration, mediation, and conciliation regimes in 100 economies. All surveyed economies recognize arbitration as a tool for resolving commercial disputes and only nine economies have not acceded to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. In the Arbitrating and Mediating Disputes indicators, High Income OECD and Eastern Europe and Central Asia are the regions that reformed their laws on alternative dispute resolution the most between 2011 and 2012. The data also show that, globally, arbitration proceedings take 326 days on average, while recognition and enforcement proceedings of foreign arbitral awards take 557 days on average. The Arbitration and Mediating Disputes indicators are significantly correlated with perception data on the importance of alternative dispute resolution, as well as other measures such as total foreign direct investment inflows and inflows per capita, the Doing Business 2013 Enforcing Contracts data, the World Bank Group's Governance Indicators, the World Economic Forum's Global Competitiveness Indicators, and the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency's World Investment and Political Risk data. The paper concludes by identifying several opportunities for improvement, such as greater flexibility for domestic arbitration regimes, faster arbitration proceedings, and better domestic court capabilities.

La recherche effectuée a conduit à examiner comment les modes alternatifs de règlement des conflits (MARC), a priori nouveaux dans le droit français, ont été intégrés dans le discours des juristes, tel que tenu dans un ensemble de publications sélectionnées. Le dépouillement a permis l'établissement de 88 fiches concernant les ouvrages, et de 336 fiches s'agissant des revues. L'étude de cette masse documentaire, représentative du réseau de publications par lesquelles les juristes présentent, analysent le droit et contribuent à le faire, a montré comment la formule de "modes alternatifs" est entrée dans le discours doctrinal, mais aussi l'hétérogénéité des termes et des sens que recouvre cette formule. Quant au contenu du discours, on constate des constantes (un discours "de mode" et un discours "de crise") et des variantes dans l'appréciation portée sur cet objet. Loin de voir dans le développement des modes alternatifs de règlement des conflits une raison de remettre en cause leur activité et leur rôle, les juristes français ont intégré cet objet, recouvrant pour l'essentiel des mécanismes juridiques classiques, dans leurs analyses, et pour chacun des secteurs du droit concerné, l'ont situé dans un débat préexistant. La recherche de définitions, la (re)construction de catégories juridiques, l'élaboration d'un régime, sont autant de questions aujourd'hui considérées comme part intégrante de toute présentation de la justice ou des appareils judiciaires. Le discours tenu par les juristes tend aujourd'hui à privilégier l'examen technique de questions, situées dans le contexte d'une évolution caractérisée par la contractualisation, la procéduralisation du droit. Cette évolution, et non révolution, est désormais, dans la majorité des cas, présentée comme un phénomène irréversible.