Bibliographie sélective OHADA

La vente commerciale internationale est considérée par tous comme l'épicentre de la mondialisation. Contrat synallagmatique par excellence, elle crée à l'encontre des parties des obligations réciproques. L'une de ces obligations est sans conteste l'obligation de conformité. Contrairement au droit interne qui continue de traiter le sujet à travers une panoplie d'actions qui varient selon l'angle d'attaque de la victime, le droit uniforme issu de la Convention de Vienne du 11 avril 1980 ramène l'ensemble des actions en deux grandes catégories régies soit par les dispositions de l'article 35 CVIM en ce qui concerne la non conformité matérielle, soit par les dispositions des articles 41 et 42 CVIM en ce qui concerne la non conformité juridique. Cette approche unitaire est la pierre angulaire de cette nouvelle édification normative. Sa visée principale consiste au premier abord à éluder les disparités normatives, pierre d'achoppement pour les échanges commerciaux internationaux.

La corruption est une pratique qui freine le développement et peut toucher diverses activités, notamment les activités économiques internationales. Elle porte atteinte au bon fonctionnement du commerce international, nécessitant de lutter contre elle.Cette étude vise à mettre en évidence l’existence d’un cadre juridique anticorruption posé par le droit du commerce international qui est à l’épreuve de la lutte contre cette pratique. Ce cadre juridique anticorruption se matérialise par l’existence d’outils pouvant être rangés en deux catégories : les outils appartenant au corpus des règles du commerce international et des outils complémentaires apportés par d’autres règles de droit très largement connectées au droit du commerce international, tels que l’arbitrage international et le droit des investissements internationaux.Ces outils ne suffisent cependant pas à eux seuls à venir à bout de la corruption. Ils nécessitent un renforcement de la lutte contre la corruption. À cet effet, cette étude montrera que les outils principaux et complémentaires du commerce international sont complétés par des actions des acteurs du commerce international : acteurs privés ou publics.

Illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing threatens the ability of the aquatic systems to continue providing vital ecosystem services and essential food resources. Most of the existing economic analysis on IUU fishing is conducted from the perspective of IUU fishing vessels rather than that of States. This paper seeks to fill this gap and concludes that trade measures against IUU fishing are cost-effective for the international community, as the IUU fishing has reached such a substantial scale that the total harm or loss caused is estimated to be greater than the total abatement costs required. Meanwhile, from a legal point of view, trade measures against IUU fishing might have more tensions with international trade law than with the international law of the sea. This paper draws on relevant GATT and WTO jurisprudence for guidance to eliminate such tensions. Two other comprehensive solutions to ensure legal compliance of trade measures against IUU fishing include taking such measures on a cooperative basis and making use of the standard-setting process through competent international organizations or conferences such as the FAO.

International trade law is at a turning point, and the rules as we know them are being broken, rewritten, and reshaped at all levels. At the same time that institutions like the World Trade Organization (WTO) face significant change and a global pandemic challenges the rules of the market, Africa’s new mega-regional trade agreement, the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), is emerging as a promising framework for redesigning international economic law. As this Article will argue, the AfCFTA presents a new normative approach to trade and development that is positioned to rewrite the rules in a more inclusive and equitable way and, over time, possibly affect global trade well beyond the African continent.Historically, trade and development have been linked through the framework of Special and Differential Treatment (S&D), which has been a central feature of the WTO and is increasingly shaping regional trade agreements (RTAs) as well. Although the connection between trade and development is more important than ever before, traditional S&D is not positioned to deliver on broader priorities of social and economic development in the current international climate. Fortunately, as this Article will argue, Africa’s approach under the new AfCFTA sets the stage for a needed refresh of S&D. While the AfCFTA incorporates traditional aspects of S&D, it also includes elements of a forward-looking, rules-based approach to further economic and social development, advancing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This new dimension of S&D holds great potential for promoting integration through trade, representing the needs of a diverse group of countries in the rulemaking process, and reshaping international economic law more broadly to generate positive development outcomes. This Article begins with an assessment of the AfCFTA as an alternative model for trade and development law, evaluating the agreement in the historical and evolving context of S&D and examining its role in shaping a new normative approach to S&D. The AfCFTA, we argue, represents a shift from using S&D as a largely defensive trade approach to one that positions S&D as an affirmative tool for achieving sustainable development through the design and implementation of the rules of trade themselves, while still maintaining flexibility for countries that need it. This new approach may finally replace the old trade paradigm of the ”haves and have nots” with a system in which trade rules can be designed to benefit all. Although the AfCFTA is still at an early stage and will have to overcome formidable challenges, this Article provides an initial assessment of the AfCFTA’s proactive new model in the context of the substantive areas of law identified as next-stage (Phase II) negotiating priorities: intellectual property rights (IPR), investment, and competition law. The Article’s comparative assessment draws upon the laws of African nations, African and international RTAs, and other proposals for international legal reform. Finally, the Article looks to the future, positing that the AfCFTA could be the best legal instrument available to break the stalemate in international rulemaking, design new trade law approaches to pressing issues like global health and food security, and close the loop between trade rules and development goals, including the seventeen SDGs. As the AfCFTA is rolled out and implemented, it could have a profound impact on trade and development law, reshaping the rules for Africa and perhaps the world as well.

This article engages with the recently adopted agreement for the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) in the area of services. While services trade had heretofore stood at the queue of African trade pacts, the AfCFTA breaks new grounds by negotiating goods and services concurrently, signalling a paradigm shift and a commitment to a deeper integration of the continent. Upon Members’ implementation of the Protocol on Trade in Services, whose aim is to establish a single market in services, the region will be the largest economic integration agreement ever concluded since the birth of the World Trade Organization (WTO). This paper sets out to analyse the provisions of the Protocol and how they contribute to achieving the objective of attaining a single market where services (alongside goods, people and capital) move unrestricted.

International commercial arbitration has established itself as the main dispute resolution mechanism for international commercial disputes. This increased visibility has drawn attention to arbitrators’ public role, leading to a well-established general perception that arbitrators are bound to special obligations, such as the duty to be independent and impartial or the obligation to assure that arbitral proceedings are not abused to achieve nefarious goals. Despite this general acknowledgement, little attention has been paid to the mechanisms that ensure that arbitrators adhere to these obligations. In particular, there has been limited analysis of the underlying mechanisms that incentivise the production and enforcement of professional norms in this field. <p></p> This thesis argues that the particulars of the arbitration market largely explains why the evolution of the regulation of international arbitrators has not matched those of other professions. At the same time, it will argue that those same particularities create incentives for several actors, most notably the arbitral community itself, to step in and occupy this regulatory vacuum. In particular, it explores the notion that the market strategies employed by arbitrators, arbitral institutions and other members of the arbitral community have the production of professional norms as a by-product. It further explores how the arbitral market tends to create an environment where compliance with professional norms is rewarded, leading, at the same time, the arbitral community to work as a network that promotes adherence to professional norms through mostly informal sanctions.