Bibliographie sélective OHADA

Jahan, B. (2025). International Arbitration: Impact on Global Economy. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 45(3), 458–465. http://www.issr-journals.org/links/papers.php?journal=ijias&application=pdf&article=IJIAS-25-020-09

Mouzoula, N., & Kamau, A. (2025). The Middle Eastern and African Arbitration Review 2025 : Telecoms disputes in the Middle East and Africa (Global Arbitration Review, p. 15). Anjarwalla Collins & Haidermota. https://globalarbitrationreview.com/review/the-middle-eastern-and-african-arbitration-review/2025/article/telecoms-disputes-in-the-middle-east-and-africa/download

Rivoire, M. (2025). Party autonomy and the applicable law to the merits in intellectual property arbitration. Arbitration International, 20, 1–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiae048

Piers, M., & McCarthy, S. (2025). Transforming arbitration: exploring the impact of AI, blockchain, metaverse and Web3. Radboud University Press. https://books.radbouduniversitypress.nl/index.php/rup/catalog/view/transforming-arbitration/304/208

Tshabalala, T., & Magau, P. (2024). The role and mandate of the motor industry ombudsman of South Africa : addressing prospects and challenges to enhance consumer protection. PER / PELJ, 27, 1–22. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2024/v27i0a17899

Wijaya, D. W. (2024). Legal Certainty in the Resolution Process of Business Disputes due to Default on Payment with Bank Guarantee through Arbitration. International Journal of Science and Research, 13(12), 918–922. https://doi.org/10.21275/SR241210194838

Selim, I., & Hafez, M. (2024). The Middle Eastern and African Arbitration Review 2024 : CRCICA and new CRCICA Arbitration Rules (Global Arbitration Review, p. 14). The Cairo Regional Centre for International Commercial Arbitration. https://globalarbitrationreview.com/review/the-middle-eastern-and-african-arbitration-review/2024/article/crcica-and-new-crcica-arbitration-rules/download

Nottage, L., Teramura, N., & Tanna, J. (2024). Lawyers and Non-Lawyers in International Arbitration: Discovering Diminishing Diversity. Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review, 47(2), 139–171. https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/ilr/vol47/iss2/2

Jarrett, M. (2024). A Proposal for Reforming the Calculation of Damages in Investment Treaty Arbitration = Proposition pour le calcul des dommages-intérêts dans l’arbitrage au titre des traités d’investissement = Propuesta para Reformar el Cálculo de Daños en el Arbitraje de Los Tratados de Inversión. Investment Treaty News. https://www.iisd.org/itn/en/2024/07/02/a-proposal-for-reforming-the-calculation-of-damages-in-investment-treaty-arbitration/

Kirkwood, J. (2024). Characterization (and Registration) of a “BRI Dispute.” Asian Journal of International Law, 14(2), 324–357. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S2044251323000498

Du, J., & Zhang, Y. (2024). The impact of ISDS arbitration claims and adjudication on cross-border direct investment. Transnational Corporations Review, 16(2), 14 p. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tncr.2024.200053

Nshom, K. G. (2024). The Enforcement of Settlement Agreements Under the Ohada Uniform Act on Mediation. IUS LAW Journal, 3(1), 66–85. https://iuslawjournal.ius.edu.ba/index.php/iuslawjournal/article/view/13/12

Christie, D., Mante, J., & Mak, C. H. W. (2024, April 22). Transformative impact of blockchain technology and smart contracts on dispute resolution: legal challenges and other implications. Artificial Intelligence: Its Applications, Academic and Practical Legal Implications. 10th Kuwait International Law School annual international academic conference (KILAW 2024), Kuwait. https://rgu-repository.worktribe.com/OutputFile/2451559

Rohmah, N. Q. (2024). Current Issues of the Utilization of Online Dispute Resolution as a Method for International Trade Dispute Settlement. Ipso Jure, 1(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.62872/aspttq36

Ali, S. (2024). Part XV Chapter 2, Conciliation beyond the courts: aspirations and limits of mandated and voluntary court mediation programmes from a multi-jurisdictional perspective. In B. Hess, M. Woo, L. Cadiet, S. Menétrey, & E. Vallines García (Eds.), Comparative Procedural Law and Justice. Max Planck Institute. https://cdn.sanity.io/files/kp0g8fgq/production/d08337d675959ffca16973c7558e754a571745f8.pdf

Beretta, R. (2024). Procedural Justice in Online Dispute Resolution: An Empirical Enquiry [Doctoral Thesis, University of Antwerp]. https://repository.uantwerpen.be/docstore/d:irua:24026

Bisina, L. N. (2024). Evaluating the International Arbitration of Oil and Gas Investment Dispute Settlement in Nigeria. African Journal of International Energy & Environmental Law, 10(1), 14–32. https://ajieel.com/index.php/a/article/view/101/95

Cairo Regional Centre for International Commercial Arbitration. (2024). Arbitration rules : In force as from 15 January 2024. CRCICA. https://crcica.org/rules/arbitration/cr_arb_rules_en.pdf

Jarrett, M. (2024). ISDS 2.0: Time for a Doctrine of Precedent? Journal of International Economic Law, 27(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgad033

Mbarga, D. A. O. (2024). Climate Change Litigation in Civil Law African Countries: An Assessment of Barriers and Potentialities in Cameroon. In K. Bouwer, U. Etemire, T.-L. Field, & A. O. Jegede (Eds.), Climate Litigation and Justice in Africa (pp. 102–122). Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.9941112.11