Bibliographie sélective OHADA

Cannavo, M. (2012). I sistemi di risoluzione stragiudiziale delle controversie in materia bancaria e finanziaria [Tesi di dottorato, Università di Pisa]. https://etd.adm.unipi.it/theses/available/etd-12012012-114211/

Danic, O. (2012). L’émergence du droit international des investissements : contribution des traités bilatéraux d’investissement et de la jurisprudence du CIRDI [Thèse de doctorat, Université Paris 10]. https://hal.science/tel-02166275v1/file/these_Olivia_Danic_DII.pdf

Mattei, L. (2012). La responsabilité sociétale des entreprises et la médiation [Thèse de doctorat, Université Paris 9]. https://theses.hal.science/tel-01089202v1/file/these-laetitia-mattei.pdf

Kananke, C. L. (2012). The legal and institutional framework for the enforcement of online consumer arbitration awards: evidence from Australia and Sri Lanka [Doctoral Thesis, La Trobe University]. https://figshare.com/ndownloader/files/38779650

Ayad, M. B. (2012). A proposal to guide future draft article provisions for a model harmonised international commercial arbitration law code (HICALC) in the Middle East and North Africa or a uniform Arab arbitration law [Doctoral Thesis, Macquarie University]. https://doi.org/10.25949/19434023.v1

Hocine, F. (2012). L’Influence de l’accueil de la sentence arbitrale par le juge algérien sur l’efficacité de l’arbitrage commercial international [Thèse de doctorat, Université Mouloud Mammeri]. https://dspace.ummto.dz/bitstreams/c4e91675-55bf-4ab2-a0dd-908ae2f8abbc/download

Bashi Rudahindwa, J. (2012). From Port Louis to Panama and Washington DC: Two Regional Approaches to International Commercial Arbitration. European Journal of Law Reform, 14(1), 44–64. https://eprints.soas.ac.uk/39204/1/Jonathan%20Bashi%20-%20From%20Port-Louis%20to%20Panama%20and%20Washington%20DC%2C%20two%20regional%20approaches%20to%20international%20commercial%20arbitration.pdf

Guerrero, L. F. (2012). Efetividade das estipulações voltadas à instituição dos meios multiportas de solução de litígios [Tese de doutoramento, Universidade de São Paulo]. https://doi.org/10.11606/T.2.2012.tde-09042013-150524

Mante, J., & Ndekugri, I. (2012). Arbitrability in the context of Ghana’s new arbitration law. International Arbitration Law Review, 15(2), 31–41. https://rgu-repository.worktribe.com/OutputFile/299157

Roodt, C. (2012). Reflections on finality in arbitration. De Jure, 45(3), 485–510. https://doi.org/10.10520/EJC131287

Elcin, M. (2012). Lex mercatoria in international arbitration theory and practice. Vol 1 [Doctoral Thesis, European University Institute]. https://doi.org/10.2870/18958

Elcin, M. (2012). Lex mercatoria in international arbitration theory and practice. Vol 2 [Doctoral Thesis, European University Institute]. https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/25204/2012_ELCIN_Vol2.pdf

Jacob, P., & Latty, F. (2012). Arbitrage transnational et droit international général (2012). Annuaire Français de Droit International, 58(1), 605–652. https://doi.org/10.3406/afdi.2012.4696

Yildiz, I. (2012). La priorité chronologique reconnue à l’arbitre en droit maritime français, particularisme ou universalisme ? Le principe dit de compétence-compétence [Master Thesis, Aix-Marseille Université]. https://dumas.ccsd.cnrs.fr/dumas-01627985v1/file/YILDIZ%20Irfan%20La%20priorit%C3%A9%20chronologique%20reconnue%20%C3%A0%20l%E2%80%99arbitre%20en%20droit%20maritime%20fran%C3%A7ais%20le%20principe%20dit%20de%20comp%C3%A9tence%20comp%C3%A9tence%20-%202012.pdf

Yu, H.-L. (2012). Duty of Confidentiality: Myth or Reality? Civil Justice Quarterly, 31(1), 68–88. https://dspace.stir.ac.uk/bitstream/1893/17947/1/Hong-Lin%20Yu%20CJQ%202012.pdf