Bibliographie sélective OHADA

Mouzoula, N., & Kamau, A. (2025). The Middle Eastern and African Arbitration Review 2025 : Telecoms disputes in the Middle East and Africa (Global Arbitration Review, p. 15). Anjarwalla Collins & Haidermota. https://globalarbitrationreview.com/review/the-middle-eastern-and-african-arbitration-review/2025/article/telecoms-disputes-in-the-middle-east-and-africa/download

Al-Taani, M., Al-Majali, T., Mosabeh, R., & Mayah, Y. (2025). Arbitration Fees, Expenses and  Determination Controls. Jordan Journal of Applied Science-Humanities Series, 43(2). https://doi.org/10.35192/jjoas-h.v43i2.1652

Letlonkane, K. (2025). Social justice at the Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) and the critical role of the commissioner [Doctoral Thesis, Stellenbosch University]. https://scholar.sun.ac.za/bitstreams/43d8f1cc-3edf-4927-8545-879224d54bca/download

Oueina, F., & Oussale, A. A. A. H. (2025). La mise en œuvre de la médiation institutionnelle en droit OHADA. Revue africaine de droit des affaires, 9, 40–52. https://juris-intelligence.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/RADA-NA%C2%B0-9-Dossier_compressed.pdf

Salguero, K. C. G., López, V. P. S., Cáceres, A. R. E., & Chávez, L. A. M. (2025). Mediación y Arbitraje en Línea: Ventajas y Desafíos. Polo del Conocimiento, 10(1), 2326–2332. https://doi.org/10.23857/pc.v10i1.8949

Rivoire, M. (2025). Party autonomy and the applicable law to the merits in intellectual property arbitration. Arbitration International, 20, 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiae048

Djeudjo Tankeu, G. (2025). L’équité dans l’arbitrage. Revue Africaine des Sciences Juridiques, Administratives et Politiques, 1, 108–127. https://usjpb.edu.ml/site/doc/Rasjap1_28.pdf

Gueukam Tchako, Y. (2025). Le règlement des différends en matière d’environnement au Cameroun. Revue Africaine des Sciences Juridiques, Administratives et Politiques, 7, 156–171. https://usjpb.edu.ml/site/doc/Rasjap7_31.pdf

Piers, M., & McCarthy, S. (2025). Transforming arbitration: exploring the impact of AI, blockchain, metaverse and Web3. Radboud University Press. https://books.radbouduniversitypress.nl/index.php/rup/catalog/view/transforming-arbitration/304/208

Anciza Migani, R., Mbazi, G. B., Murhula Bahati, P., & Iragi Ntwali, V. (2024). Du dessaisissement du juge étatique face à la convention d’arbitrage en droit de l’OHADA. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Studia Europaea, 69(2), 97–117. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbeuropaea.2024.2.06

Sönmez, E. Y. (2024). From Divergent Paths to the Same Trap: The Legitimacy Crisis of the Investor-State Dispute Settlement System [Doctoral Thesis, Middle East Technical University]. https://open.metu.edu.tr/bitstream/handle/11511/112934/10689718.pdf

Zengue, L.-F. (2024, December 3). Confidentialité, secret, protection des données et intelligence artificielle dans la procédure arbitrale [Blog]. Modes Alternatifs de Règlement des Différends (MARD), Justice amiable. https://www.village-justice.com/articles/confidentialite-secret-protection-des-donnees-procedure-arbitrale,50895.html

Dizo, K. (2024). Essai sur les critères d’arbitrabilité des litiges en Droit OHADA et en Droit Français [Thèse de doctorat, Nantes Université]. https://theses.hal.science/tel-05599781v1/file/DIZO.pdf

Rafai, K. (2024). L’autonomie de la clause compromissoire en droit de l’arbitrage Marocain et Québécois: entre consécration et limites [Mémoire de maîtrise, Université de Montréal]. https://umontreal.scholaris.ca/server/api/core/bitstreams/53b0fc89-480b-4ebf-908b-dc09d81cb05f/content

Tshabalala, T., & Magau, P. (2024). The role and mandate of the motor industry ombudsman of South Africa : addressing prospects and challenges to enhance consumer protection. PER / PELJ, (27), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2024/v27i0a17899

Wijaya, D. W. (2024). Legal Certainty in the Resolution Process of Business Disputes due to Default on Payment with Bank Guarantee through Arbitration. International Journal of Science and Research, 13(12), 918–922. https://doi.org/10.21275/SR241210194838

Selim, I., & Hafez, M. (2024). The Middle Eastern and African Arbitration Review 2024 : CRCICA and new CRCICA Arbitration Rules (Global Arbitration Review, p. 14). The Cairo Regional Centre for International Commercial Arbitration. https://globalarbitrationreview.com/review/the-middle-eastern-and-african-arbitration-review/2024/article/crcica-and-new-crcica-arbitration-rules/download

Nottage, L., Teramura, N., & Tanna, J. (2024). Lawyers and Non-Lawyers in International Arbitration: Discovering Diminishing Diversity. Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review, 47(2), 139–171. https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/ilr/vol47/iss2/2

Jarrett, M. (2024). A Proposal for Reforming the Calculation of Damages in Investment Treaty Arbitration = Proposition pour le calcul des dommages-intérêts dans l’arbitrage au titre des traités d’investissement = Propuesta para Reformar el Cálculo de Daños en el Arbitraje de Los Tratados de Inversión. Investment Treaty News. https://www.iisd.org/itn/en/2024/07/02/a-proposal-for-reforming-the-calculation-of-damages-in-investment-treaty-arbitration/

Kirkwood, J. (2024). Characterization (and Registration) of a “BRI Dispute.” Asian Journal of International Law, 14(2), 324–357. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2044251323000498