Bibliographie sélective OHADA

International arbitration allows great flexibility of the parties to structure their whole relationship. One of the key factors is the choice of the law applicable to the substance of the relationship. CISG is intended for the regulation of such relations between international businessmen. This paper builds on the empirical evidence of the International Arbitration Surveys conducted among various groups of practitioners on their reasoning con cerning choice of law applicable to the substance of the relationship and argues that although CISG is not chosen by them frequently (or arguably not chosen at all), this “omission” is not warranted.