Bibliographie sélective OHADA

Wehbe, F. S. (2016). Composantes multidimentionnelles de l’arbitrage : de la considération locale à l’interculturalité internationale [Thèse de doctorat, Le Havre]. https://theses.fr/api/v1/document/2016LEHA0024

Diakité, M. (2016). L’arbitrage institutionnel OHADA : Instrument émergent de sécurisation juridique et judiciaire des activités économiques [Thèse de doctorat, Université Toulouse 1 Capitole]. https://publications.ut-capitole.fr/id/eprint/24145/1/DiakiteMoussa2016.pdf

Diallo, A. (2016). Réflexion sur l’arbitrage dans l’espace OHADA [Thèse de doctorat, Université de Perpignan]. https://theses.fr/api/v1/document/2016PERP0020

Viscasillas, P. P. (2016). The UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration: Interpretation, General Principles and Arbitrability. Journal of Law, Society and Development, 3(1), 67–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25159/2520-9515/889

Mante, J. (2016). Arbitrability and public policy: an African perspective. Arbitration International, 33(2), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiw034

Onyema, E. (2016, August 3). Rethinking the Role of Courts and Judges in Supporting Arbitration in Africa [Conference paper]. Rethinking the Role of Courts and Judges in Supporting Arbitration in Africa, Lagos Court of Arbitration, Lagos, Nigeria. https://eprints.soas.ac.uk/22727/1/Lagos%20Arbitration%20in%20Africa%20Conference%202016%20Booklet%20%28FINAL%29.pdf

Najib, M. E. M. (2016). L’intervention du juge dans la procédure arbitrale [Thèse de doctorat, Université de Bordeaux]. https://theses.hal.science/tel-01372508v1/file/NAJIB_MOHAMED_EL_MEHDI_2016_CORR.pdf

Elatafy, S. (2016). La responsabilité des centres d’arbitrage [Thèse de doctorat, Université Jean Moulin Lyon 3]. https://scd-resnum.univ-lyon3.fr/out/theses/2016_out_elatafy_s.pdf

Kalle, A. (2016). An Introduction and an Evaluation of Arbitration in Ivory Coast. Recht in Afrika, 18(2), 225–247. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5771/2363-6270-2015-2-225

Molk, P., & Winship, V. (2016). LLCs and the Private Ordering of Dispute Resolution. The Journal of Corporation Law, 41(4), 795–815. https://jcl.law.uiowa.edu/sites/jcl.law.uiowa.edu/files/2021-08/Molk_Winship_Final_Web.pdf

Badenhorst, C. H. J. (2016). State interference through domestic courts in international commercial arbitration [Master Thesis, University of Johannesburg]. https://ujcontent.uj.ac.za/esploro/outputs/graduate/State-interference-through-domestic-courts-in/9910729207691

Briggs, A. (2016). Direct actions and arbitration: all at sea. Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, 2016(3), 327–331. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:73b088c0-9ba6-4058-aa34-2cb46b892cf4/files/m73eb1127185cfe061c3c54d611364867

Gaucher, N. (2016). La prérogative de l’arbitre de relever un moyen d’office [Master Thesis, Aix-Marseille Université]. https://pole-transports-facdedroit.univ-amu.fr/sites/pole-transports-facdedroit.univ-amu.fr/files/public/gaucher_natalia_-_la_prerogative_de_larbitre_de_relever_un_moyen_doffice_-_2015-2016.pdf

Hendrawan, D. (2016). Arbitration and Justice Denial on Foreign Direct Investment. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 13(3), 434–447. https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol13.3.659

Zaheeruddin, M. (2016). Due Process of Law in International Commercial Arbitration with Special Reference to Production of Documents. Journal of Law and Criminal Justice, 4(1), 89–96. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15640/jlcj.v4n1a7