Bibliographie sélective OHADA

Sönmez, E. Y. (2024). From Divergent Paths to the Same Trap: The Legitimacy Crisis of the Investor-State Dispute Settlement System [Doctoral Thesis, Middle East Technical University]. https://open.metu.edu.tr/bitstream/handle/11511/112934/10689718.pdf

Rafai, K. (2024). L’autonomie de la clause compromissoire en droit de l’arbitrage Marocain et Québécois: entre consécration et limites [Mémoire de maîtrise, Université de Montréal]. https://umontreal.scholaris.ca/server/api/core/bitstreams/53b0fc89-480b-4ebf-908b-dc09d81cb05f/content

Tshabalala, T., & Magau, P. (2024). The role and mandate of the motor industry ombudsman of South Africa : addressing prospects and challenges to enhance consumer protection. PER / PELJ, 27, 1–22. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2024/v27i0a17899

Wijaya, D. W. (2024). Legal Certainty in the Resolution Process of Business Disputes due to Default on Payment with Bank Guarantee through Arbitration. International Journal of Science and Research, 13(12), 918–922. https://doi.org/10.21275/SR241210194838

Selim, I., & Hafez, M. (2024). The Middle Eastern and African Arbitration Review 2024 : CRCICA and new CRCICA Arbitration Rules (Global Arbitration Review, p. 14). The Cairo Regional Centre for International Commercial Arbitration. https://globalarbitrationreview.com/review/the-middle-eastern-and-african-arbitration-review/2024/article/crcica-and-new-crcica-arbitration-rules/download

Nottage, L., Teramura, N., & Tanna, J. (2024). Lawyers and Non-Lawyers in International Arbitration: Discovering Diminishing Diversity. Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review, 47(2), 139–171. https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/ilr/vol47/iss2/2

Jarrett, M. (2024). A Proposal for Reforming the Calculation of Damages in Investment Treaty Arbitration = Proposition pour le calcul des dommages-intérêts dans l’arbitrage au titre des traités d’investissement = Propuesta para Reformar el Cálculo de Daños en el Arbitraje de Los Tratados de Inversión. Investment Treaty News. https://www.iisd.org/itn/en/2024/07/02/a-proposal-for-reforming-the-calculation-of-damages-in-investment-treaty-arbitration/

Kirkwood, J. (2024). Characterization (and Registration) of a “BRI Dispute.” Asian Journal of International Law, 14(2), 324–357. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S2044251323000498

Ligan, C. S. (2024). Favoriser la culture du règlement amiable des différends : étude du droit béninois à la lumière du droit français [Thèse de doctorat, Université de Limoges]. https://theses.fr/api/v1/document/2024LIMO0034

Du, J., & Zhang, Y. (2024). The impact of ISDS arbitration claims and adjudication on cross-border direct investment. Transnational Corporations Review, 16(2), 14 p. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tncr.2024.200053

Agbénoto, K. M. (2024). Les qualités essentielles de l’arbitre en droit OHADA. Revue africaine de droit des affaires, Dossier spécial arbitrage, 17–26. https://juris-intelligence.org/2024/07/11/les-qualites-essentielles-de-larbitre-en-droit-ohada/

Delebecque, P. (2024). Les actualités de l’arbitrage maritime. Revue africaine de droit des affaires, Dossier spécial arbitrage, 14–16. https://juris-intelligence.org/2024/07/11/les-actualites-de-larbitrage-maritime/

Ngono, V. C. (2024). Panorama critique de l’arbitrage OHADA. Revue africaine de droit des affaires, Dossier spécial arbitrage, 2–10. https://juris-intelligence.org/2024/07/11/panorama-critique-de-larbitrage-ohada/

Nshom, K. G. (2024). The Enforcement of Settlement Agreements Under the Ohada Uniform Act on Mediation. IUS LAW Journal, 3(1), 66–85. https://iuslawjournal.ius.edu.ba/index.php/iuslawjournal/article/view/13/12

Teles, J. A. C. G. (2024). A renúncia a direitos fundamentais processuais na arbitragem: o caso particular do direito a requerer a anulação da sentença arbitral na arbitragem internacional [Tese de doutoramento, Universidade Nova de Lisboa]. https://run.unl.pt/bitstream/10362/184806/1/Teles_Joana_Tese_2025.pdf

Toe Adouabou, L. (2024). L’amiable au service du sauvetage de l’entreprise en difficulté en droit OHADA : la médiation et la conciliation. Revue africaine de droit des affaires, 4, 27–32. https://juris-intelligence.org/2024/06/25/lamiable-au-service-du-sauvetage-de-lentreprise-en-difficulte-en-droit-ohada-la-mediation-et-la-conciliation/

Toe, S. (2024). L’autorité de la chose jugée dans l’arbitrage OHADA. Revue africaine de droit des affaires, Dossier spécial arbitrage, 11–13. https://juris-intelligence.org/2024/07/11/lautorite-de-la-chose-jugee-dans-larbitrage-ohada/

Christie, D., Mante, J., & Mak, C. H. W. (2024, April 22). Transformative impact of blockchain technology and smart contracts on dispute resolution: legal challenges and other implications. Artificial Intelligence: Its Applications, Academic and Practical Legal Implications. 10th Kuwait International Law School annual international academic conference (KILAW 2024), Kuwait. https://rgu-repository.worktribe.com/OutputFile/2451559

Rohmah, N. Q. (2024). Current Issues of the Utilization of Online Dispute Resolution as a Method for International Trade Dispute Settlement. Ipso Jure, 1(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.62872/aspttq36

Silabing Ouethy, J. D. (2024). L’agence de régulation des télécommunications au Cameroun : un centre d’arbitrage d’une nature particulière. Revue africaine de droit des affaires, 3, 25–35. https://juris-intelligence.org/2024/07/10/lagence-de-regulation-des-telecommunications-au-cameroun-un-centre-darbitrage-dune-nature-particuliere/