Bibliographie sélective OHADA

Explorez la bibliographie sélective OHADA de ressources Open Access en droit des affaires

Type de ressource
Auteurs/contributeurs
Titre
Legal Reconstruction of Dispute Settlement Between Importers and Exporters International Law Perspective
Résumé
Reconstruction of dispute resolution law between importers and exporters from an international law perspective. The purpose of this study is to analyze: 1) How does the law of dispute resolution between importers and exporters perspective international law? 2) How is the implementation of the recommendations of the dispute resolution bodies of the World Trade Organization from an international law perspective? The research method used is normative juridical with a statutory approach, concept approach, and case studies. The results showed that: 1) Import export is a series of company activities that begin with an agreement. The agreement is the result of previous activities carried out by exporters and importers, namely in the form of supply and demand. The agreement is poured into a sales contract which is an agreement between exporters and importers to trade goods in accordance with mutually agreed conditions and each party binds itself to carry out all obligations incurred. 2) The series of processes undertaken in dispute settlement at the WTO consist of 4 processes, including: Mandatory Consultation between disputing parties to reach a settlement approved by the parties, Application for the establishment of a Panel, the Appellate Body, and the implementation and implementation of recommendations and provisions endorsed by the DSB.
Publication
Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University, Natural Sciences Edition
Maison d’édition
Xi'an Shiyou University
Date
2023-11
Volume
66
Numéro
11
Pages
336-348
ISSN
1673-064X
Langue
EN
Référence
Pristha Utama, W., Tri, L., & Setiyono, J. (2023). Legal Reconstruction of Dispute Settlement Between Importers and Exporters International Law Perspective. Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University, Natural Sciences Edition, 66(11), 336–348. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10203269