Law harmonization and local specificities – a case study: OHADA and the law of contracts
Type de ressource
Auteur/contributeur
- Fontaine, Marcel (Auteur)
Titre
Law harmonization and local specificities – a case study: OHADA and the law of contracts
Résumé
Unifying or harmonizing the laws of different countries means replacing, to respective degrees, the existing national laws with common rules.1 The merits of law unification or harmonization may seem to be obvious. They have been repeatedly described. Law diversity is an obstacle to trade between countries. Engaging in a commercial operation with a partner of another legal system immediately raises the question of which law will govern the relationship, with the consequence that, for one of the parties, the contract will be subject to unfamiliar rules (perhaps even for both parties if the law of a third party is determined to be applicable).
Publication
Uniform Law Review
Volume
18
Numéro
1
Pages
50-64
Date
2013-06-01
Abrév. de revue
Uniform Law Review
Langue
EN
ISSN
1124-3694
Titre abrégé
Law harmonization and local specificities – a case study
Loc. dans l'archive
Catalogue de bibl.
Silverchair
Référence
Fontaine, M. (2013). Law harmonization and local specificities – a case study: OHADA and the law of contracts. Uniform Law Review, 18(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/unt001
Thématiques
Lien de cet enregistrement