Bibliographie sélective OHADA

国际商事仲裁作为国际商事纠纷的解决机制，一直坚持“一裁终局”原则，因其高效解决纠纷的优势而受到国际商事当事人大量适用。“一裁终局”原则因仲裁裁决具有终局性从而能相对快速的解决彼此之间的纠纷，但在现存的裁决审查程序制度下，其“一裁终局”的模式也使得当事人无进一步就裁决中的实体错误进行纠正的可能。因此，为了更好地适应现今的国际商事环境，本文欲探讨在保障仲裁高效解决纠纷的优势的前提下，通过仲裁制度的设计，在国际商事仲裁中建立复裁机制，进一步提高国际商事仲裁裁决的公正性。 International commercial arbitration has always been a dispute resolution mechanism based on the principle of “final and binding” to efficiently resolve disputes, which has been widely used by international commercial parties. The “final and binding” principle can relatively quickly resolve disputes between parties because the arbitral award is final. However, under the existing system of arbitral award review procedures, the “final and binding” principle also means that parties have no further possibility to correct substantive errors in the award. Therefore, in order to better adapt to today’s international commercial environment, this article intends to discuss the establishment of a review mechanism in international commercial arbitration through the design of the arbitration system on the premise of ensuring the advantages of efficient dispute resolution by arbitration, so as to further improve the impartiality of international commercial arbitration awards.