Bibliographie sélective OHADA

Łągiewska, M. (2026). Artifical intelligence and international arbitration law: revolution or evolution. Taylor & Francis. 10.4324/9781003667834

Hayward, B. (2025). The Interpretation of UNCITRAL Law in Australian Courts: A Roadmap for Elevating the UN Sales Convention’s Status to That of Arbitration Law. Sydney Law Review, 47, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.30722/slr.21292

Solano Mantilla, V. (2025). The role of ADR and judicial agreements: legal analysis and behavioral economics insights [Master Thesis, LUISS Guido Carli]. https://tesi.luiss.it/44372/1/189973_SOLANO%20MANTILLA_VALERIA.pdf

Petrova Georgieva, V. (2025). Transparency in Investor-State Arbitration Under USMCA. Jurídica Ibero. Revista Semestral Del Departamento de Derecho de La Universidad Iberoamericana, (19), 25–57. https://doi.org/10.48102/ji.19.255

Okoli, P. (2025). Promoting Treaties in Nigeria and Operationalising the Singapore Convention on Mediation. African Journal of Legal Studies, (17), 164–195. https://doi.org/10.1163/17087384-12340113

Jahan, B. (2025). International Arbitration: Impact on Global Economy. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 45(3), 458–465. http://www.issr-journals.org/links/papers.php?journal=ijias&application=pdf&article=IJIAS-25-020-09

Wilske, S. (2025). The UNCITRAL Model Law: “Follow you follow me” or “I do it my way.” Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal, 18(1), 1–32. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/5270205.pdf

Mouzoula, N., & Kamau, A. (2025). The Middle Eastern and African Arbitration Review 2025 : Telecoms disputes in the Middle East and Africa (Global Arbitration Review, p. 15). Anjarwalla Collins & Haidermota. https://globalarbitrationreview.com/review/the-middle-eastern-and-african-arbitration-review/2025/article/telecoms-disputes-in-the-middle-east-and-africa/download

Letlonkane, K. (2025). Social justice at the Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) and the critical role of the commissioner [Doctoral Thesis, Stellenbosch University]. https://scholar.sun.ac.za/bitstreams/43d8f1cc-3edf-4927-8545-879224d54bca/download

Rivoire, M. (2025). Party autonomy and the applicable law to the merits in intellectual property arbitration. Arbitration International, 20, 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiae048

Piers, M., & McCarthy, S. (2025). Transforming arbitration: exploring the impact of AI, blockchain, metaverse and Web3. Radboud University Press. https://books.radbouduniversitypress.nl/index.php/rup/catalog/view/transforming-arbitration/304/208

Sönmez, E. Y. (2024). From Divergent Paths to the Same Trap: The Legitimacy Crisis of the Investor-State Dispute Settlement System [Doctoral Thesis, Middle East Technical University]. https://open.metu.edu.tr/bitstream/handle/11511/112934/10689718.pdf

Tshabalala, T., & Magau, P. (2024). The role and mandate of the motor industry ombudsman of South Africa : addressing prospects and challenges to enhance consumer protection. PER / PELJ, (27), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2024/v27i0a17899

Wijaya, D. W. (2024). Legal Certainty in the Resolution Process of Business Disputes due to Default on Payment with Bank Guarantee through Arbitration. International Journal of Science and Research, 13(12), 918–922. https://doi.org/10.21275/SR241210194838

Selim, I., & Hafez, M. (2024). The Middle Eastern and African Arbitration Review 2024 : CRCICA and new CRCICA Arbitration Rules (Global Arbitration Review, p. 14). The Cairo Regional Centre for International Commercial Arbitration. https://globalarbitrationreview.com/review/the-middle-eastern-and-african-arbitration-review/2024/article/crcica-and-new-crcica-arbitration-rules/download

Nottage, L., Teramura, N., & Tanna, J. (2024). Lawyers and Non-Lawyers in International Arbitration: Discovering Diminishing Diversity. Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review, 47(2), 139–171. https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/ilr/vol47/iss2/2

Jarrett, M. (2024). A Proposal for Reforming the Calculation of Damages in Investment Treaty Arbitration = Proposition pour le calcul des dommages-intérêts dans l’arbitrage au titre des traités d’investissement = Propuesta para Reformar el Cálculo de Daños en el Arbitraje de Los Tratados de Inversión. Investment Treaty News. https://www.iisd.org/itn/en/2024/07/02/a-proposal-for-reforming-the-calculation-of-damages-in-investment-treaty-arbitration/

Kirkwood, J. (2024). Characterization (and Registration) of a “BRI Dispute.” Asian Journal of International Law, 14(2), 324–357. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2044251323000498

Du, J., & Zhang, Y. (2024). The impact of ISDS arbitration claims and adjudication on cross-border direct investment. Transnational Corporations Review, 16(2), 1–14. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1925209924005795). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tncr.2024.200053

Nshom, K. G. (2024). The Enforcement of Settlement Agreements Under the Ohada Uniform Act on Mediation. IUS LAW Journal, 3(1), 66–85. https://iuslawjournal.ius.edu.ba/index.php/iuslawjournal/article/view/13/12