Bibliographie sélective OHADA

国际投资仲裁实践中，仲裁庭随意解释、扩大解释、解释不一致或背离缔约国真实意图的情形极为常见。《维也纳条约法公约》第31条至33条作为习惯国际法条约解释的黄金法则，对仲裁庭条约解释权的引导至关重要。利用法律解释理论，对《维也纳条约法公约》第31条的重构，利用该公约引导与规范仲裁庭的条约解释权，强化文本解释的框架作用，将文本解释与目的解释相结合，正确理解嗣后解释与系统解释的辅助作用，引入演化解释法，以推动仲裁庭正确理解投资条约条款，作出准确、有效、合理的解释。 In the practice of international investment arbitration, it is extremely common for arbitral tribunals to arbitrarily interpret, expand interpretation, interpret inconsist-ently or deviate from the true intent of the contracting parties. Articles 31 to 33 of the Vienna Con-vention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT), as the golden rule of treaty interpretation in customary state law, are crucial in guiding the power of treaty interpretation of arbitral tribunals, using the theory of legal interpretation, the reconstruction of Article 31 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Trea-ties, the use of the Convention to guide and rule the treaty interpretation power of the arbitral tri-bunal, strengthen the framework role of textual interpretation, combine textual interpretation with purposive interpretation, correctly understand the auxiliary role of subsequent interpretation and systematic interpretation, and introduce the evolutionary interpretation method in order to pro-mote the arbitral tribunal to correctly understand the provisions of investment treaties and make accurate, effective and reasonable interpretation.