Bibliographie sélective OHADA

Explorez la bibliographie sélective OHADA de ressources Open Access en droit des affaires

Type de ressource
Auteurs/contributeurs
Titre
International Arbitration in Energy Disputes: Lessons from UNCITRAL Case Laws
Résumé
International arbitration is a critical mechanism for resolving energy disputes, offering a neutral and efficient means for addressing complex cross-border issues. This research examines the role of UNCITRAL (United Nations Commission on International Trade Law) case law in shaping arbitration practices within the energy sector. By analyzing key UNCITRAL arbitral decisions, the study identifies emerging trends, procedural challenges, and key lessons learned from past energy-related disputes. It explores how the UNCITRAL Model Law provides a flexible framework for arbitral tribunals, ensuring fairness and impartiality in the resolution of disputes involving multiple jurisdictions and diverse stakeholders. Additionally, the research highlights the importance of UNCITRAL’s influence in enhancing the enforceability of arbitration awards and promoting consistency in energy dispute resolution. Through the review of significant case studies, the paper evaluates practical implications related to the application of international law principles, including the enforcement of contracts, good faith, and dispute resolution strategies. The study offers valuable insights for legal practitioners, policymakers, and stakeholders in the energy sector, recommending potential improvements to arbitration processes to foster greater predictability and efficiency in resolving energy disputes.
Publication
ACADEMIA International Journal for Social Sciences
Date
2025-03-30
Volume
4
Numéro
1
Pages
175-184
Abrév. de revue
AIJSS
Consulté le
29/09/2026 09:55
ISSN
3006-6638
Titre abrégé
International Arbitration in Energy Disputes
Langue
EN
Référence
Shami, A. Z. A., Ashraf, C., & Asghar, U. (2025). International Arbitration in Energy Disputes: Lessons from UNCITRAL Case Laws. ACADEMIA International Journal for Social Sciences, 4(1), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.63056/ACAD.004.01.0054